Iodine quantification with dual-energy CT: phantom study and preliminary experience with renal masses.

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to validate the utility of dual-source dual-energy MDCT in quantifying iodine concentration in a phantom and in renal masses. MATERIALS AND METHODS A series of tubes containing solutions of varying iodine concentration were imaged with dual-source dual-energy MDCT. Iodine concentration was calculated and compared with known iodine concentration. Single-phase contrast-enhanced dual-source dual-energy MDCT data on 15 patients with renal lesions then were assessed independently by two readers. Dual-energy postprocessing was used to generate iodine-only images. Regions of interest were placed on the iodine image over the lesion and, as a reference, over the aorta, for recording of iodine concentration in the lesion and in the aorta. Another radiologist determined lesion enhancement by comparing truly unenhanced with contrast-enhanced images. Mixed-model analysis of variance based on ranks was used to compare lesion types (simple cyst, hemorrhagic cyst, enhancing mass) in terms of lesion iodine concentration and lesion-to-aorta iodine ratio. RESULTS In the phantom study, there was excellent correlation between calculated and true iodine concentration (R(2) = 0.998, p < 0.0001). In the patient study, 13 nonenhancing (10 simple and three hyperdense cysts) and eight enhancing renal masses were evaluated in 15 patients. The lesion iodine concentration and lesion-to-aorta iodine ratio in enhancing masses were significantly higher than in hyperdense and simple cysts (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION Iodine quantification with dual-source dual-energy MDCT is accurate in a phantom and can be used to determine the presence and concentration of iodine in a renal lesion. Characterization of renal masses may be possible with a single dual-source dual-energy MDCT acquisition without unenhanced images or reliance on a change in attenuation measurements.

[1]  Dual-phase helical CT of the kidney: value of the corticomedullary and nephrographic phase for evaluation of renal lesions and preoperative staging of renal cell carcinoma. , 1997 .

[2]  J A Brink,et al.  Aortic and hepatic peak enhancement at CT: effect of contrast medium injection rate--pharmacokinetic analysis and experimental porcine model. , 1998, Radiology.

[3]  J A Brink,et al.  Aortic and hepatic contrast medium enhancement at CT. Part II. Effect of reduced cardiac output in a porcine model. , 1998, Radiology.

[4]  J. Ellis,et al.  Aortic enhancement during abdominal CT angiography: correlation with test injections, flow rates, and patient demographics. , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  R. Figlin,et al.  Renal cell carcinoma: prognostic significance of incidentally detected tumors. , 2001, The Journal of urology.

[6]  E. Fishman,et al.  Current concepts in the diagnosis and management of renal cell carcinoma: role of multidetector ct and three-dimensional CT. , 2001, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[7]  N. Obuchowski,et al.  Enhancement characteristics of papillary renal neoplasms revealed on triphasic helical CT of the kidneys. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  Kyoung-Sik Cho,et al.  Differentiation of subtypes of renal cell carcinoma on helical CT scans. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  N. Obuchowski,et al.  Analysis of changes in attenuation of proven renal cysts on different scanning phases of triphasic MDCT. , 2004, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  A. Ruppert-Kohlmayr,et al.  Differentiation of renal clear cell carcinoma and renal papillary carcinoma using quantitative CT enhancement parameters. , 2004, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[11]  G. Israel,et al.  How I do it: evaluating renal masses. , 2005, Radiology.

[12]  Haesun Choi.  Critical issues in response evaluation on computed tomography: Lessons from the gastrointestinal stromal tumor model , 2005, Current oncology reports.

[13]  D. Balvay,et al.  Tumor angiogenesis: pathophysiology and implications for contrast-enhanced MRI and CT assessment , 2006, Abdominal Imaging.

[14]  M. Reiser,et al.  Material differentiation by dual energy CT: initial experience , 2007, European Radiology.

[15]  James S Babb,et al.  Renal cyst pseudoenhancement: influence of multidetector CT reconstruction algorithm and scanner type in phantom model. , 2007, Radiology.

[16]  Chaya S Moskowitz,et al.  Solid renal cortical tumors: differentiation with CT. , 2007, Radiology.

[17]  James S Babb,et al.  Multi-detector row CT attenuation measurements: assessment of intra- and interscanner variability with an anthropomorphic body CT phantom. , 2007, Radiology.

[18]  G. Israel,et al.  Pitfalls in renal mass evaluation and how to avoid them. , 2008, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[19]  Konstantin Nikolaou,et al.  Dual energy CT for the assessment of lung perfusion--correlation to scintigraphy. , 2008, European journal of radiology.

[20]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer Statistics, 2008 , 2008, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[21]  M. Macari,et al.  Dual energy CT: preliminary observations and potential clinical applications in the abdomen , 2008, European Radiology.

[22]  K. Stierstorfer,et al.  Technical principles of dual source CT. , 2008, European journal of radiology.

[23]  Thomas Flohr,et al.  Lung perfusion with dual-energy multidetector-row CT (MDCT): feasibility for the evaluation of acute pulmonary embolism in 117 consecutive patients. , 2008, Academic radiology.

[24]  Hersh Chandarana,et al.  Abdominal aorta: evaluation with dual-source dual-energy multidetector CT after endovascular repair of aneurysms--initial observations. , 2008, Radiology.

[25]  C. H. McCollough,et al.  Dual-energy CT iodine overlay technique for characterization of renal masses as cyst or solid: a phantom feasibility study , 2009, European Radiology.

[26]  C. Nanni,et al.  11C-Acetate PET for Early Prediction of Sunitinib Response in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma , 2009, Tumori.

[27]  [Radiological features of dual-energy CT lung perfusion imaging in patients with acute pulmonary embolism: comparison with CT pulmonary angiography]. , 2009, Zhongguo yi xue ke xue yuan xue bao. Acta Academiae Medicinae Sinicae.

[28]  D. Hough,et al.  Dual-energy and dual-source CT: is there a role in the abdomen and pelvis? , 2009, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[29]  Areen K. Al-Bashir,et al.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of vascular changes induced by sunitinib in papillary renal cell carcinoma xenograft tumors. , 2009, Neoplasia.

[30]  Christianne Leidecker,et al.  Dual-energy CT in patients suspected of having renal masses: can virtual nonenhanced images replace true nonenhanced images? , 2009, Radiology.

[31]  Dual-energy CT with tin filter technology for the discrimination of renal lesion proxies containing blood, protein, and contrast-agent. An experimental phantom study , 2011, European Radiology.

[32]  Joel G Fletcher,et al.  Genitourinary applications of dual-energy CT. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[33]  Shetal N Shah,et al.  Morphology, Attenuation, Size, and Structure (MASS) criteria: assessing response and predicting clinical outcome in metastatic renal cell carcinoma on antiangiogenic targeted therapy. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[34]  A. Roche,et al.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (DCE-US): a new tool for the early evaluation of antiangiogenic treatment , 2010, Targeted Oncology.

[35]  H. Alkadhi,et al.  Performance of dual-energy CT with tin filter technology for the discrimination of renal cysts and enhancing masses. , 2010, Academic radiology.

[36]  M. Macari,et al.  Single-Phase Dual-Energy CT Allows for Characterization of Renal Masses as Benign or Malignant , 2010, Investigative radiology.

[37]  Dual-energy Computed Tomography Applications in Uroradiology , 2012, Current Urology Reports.

[38]  J. Platt,et al.  Dual-energy CT of the urinary tract , 2013, Abdominal Imaging.

[39]  B. Krauss,et al.  Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) in renal masses: nonlinear versus linear blending. , 2012, Academic radiology.

[40]  Hersh Chandarana,et al.  Contemporary imaging of the renal mass. , 2012, The Urologic clinics of North America.