Basic science as a prescription for breakthrough inventions in the pharmaceutical industry

This analysis contributes to the understanding of the role of basic science in generating breakthrough inventions in the pharmaceutical industry. Recognizing the within-firm heterogeneity of inventive activities, we look not only at the firm level, but also at the firm-technology level for characteristics determining breakthroughs. A key finding is that firms pursuing basic science are more likely to produce breakthrough inventions. At the same time, doing more basic science in science disciplines that are closely linked to a given technology domain does not increase the likelihood of BTs in that particular technology. The insignificance of basic science intensity at the technology level, coupled to the significance at the firm level, suggests that the breakthrough rewards from science capacity are not reaped in the technology areas immediately involved in basic science, but in other areas of the technology portfolio of the firm. Our findings are consistent with the view of science as a map to span processes of local search and the wider applicability of scientific insights.

[1]  Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al.  Scientific capabilities and technological performance of national innovation systems: An exploration of emerging industrial relevant research domains , 2006, Scientometrics.

[2]  D. Harhoff,et al.  Citation Frequency and the Value of Patented Inventions , 1999, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[3]  Kira Fabrizio Absorptive capacity and the search for innovation , 2009 .

[4]  Reinhilde Veugelers,et al.  In Search of Complementarity in Innovation Strategy: Internal R&D and External Knowledge Acquisition , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[5]  Fiona E. Murray The role of academic inventors in entrepreneurial firms: sharing the laboratory life , 2004 .

[6]  M. Trajtenberg,et al.  University Versus Corporate Patents: A Window On The Basicness Of Invention , 1997 .

[7]  Francis Narin,et al.  Status report: Linkage between technology and science , 1992 .

[8]  Maurizio Sobrero,et al.  The Trade-Off between Efficiency and Learning in Interorganizational Relationships for Product Development , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[9]  Diana Hicks,et al.  Japanese corporations, scientific research and globalization , 1994 .

[10]  Luigi Orsenigo,et al.  The Emergence of Biotechnology: Institutions and Markets in Industrial Innovation , 1989 .

[11]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[12]  Christian Sternitzke,et al.  Knowledge sources, patent protection, and commercialization of pharmaceutical innovations☆ , 2010 .

[13]  Bernard H. Munos,et al.  How to Revive Breakthrough Innovation in the Pharmaceutical Industry , 2011, Science Translational Medicine.

[14]  Bronwyn H Hall,et al.  Market value and patent citations , 2005 .

[15]  Leonard Berkowitz,et al.  Innovation and Its Discontents: How Our Broken Patent System Is Endangering Innovation and Progress and What to Do about It , 2005 .

[16]  K. Pavitt Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change : Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory : Research Policy , 1984 .

[17]  Melissa A. SchillingPatricia Learning by Doing Something Else: Variation, Relatedness, and the Learning Curve , 2003 .

[18]  David L. Deeds,et al.  An Analysis of the Critical Role of Public Science in Innovation: The Case of Biotechnology , 2000 .

[19]  Edwin Mansfield,et al.  Basic Research and Productivity Increase in Manufacturing , 1980 .

[20]  Curba Morris Lampert,et al.  Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: a longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions , 2001 .

[21]  D. Harhoff,et al.  The Value of European Patents , 2008 .

[22]  M. Polanyi The Republic of Science: Its Political and Economic Theory , 1962 .

[23]  Jeffrey M. Wooldridge,et al.  Solutions Manual and Supplementary Materials for Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data , 2003 .

[24]  A. Arundel,et al.  What percentage of innovations are patented? empirical estimates for European firms , 1998 .

[25]  Kathryn Graziano The innovator's dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail , 1998 .

[26]  Kimberly S. Hamilton,et al.  The increasing linkage between U.S. technology and public science , 1997 .

[27]  William R. Kerr,et al.  Breakthrough Inventions and Migrating Clusters of Innovation , 2009 .

[28]  Melissa A. Schilling,et al.  Recombinant Search and Breakthrough Idea Generation: An Analysis of High Impact Papers in the Social Sciences , 2011 .

[29]  W. Vanhaverbeke,et al.  Managing open innovation projects with science-based and market-based partners , 2014 .

[30]  Franco Malerba,et al.  Sectoral systems of innovation , 2014 .

[31]  Richard R. Nelson,et al.  On the Sources and Significance of Interindustry Differences in Technological Opportunities , 1995 .

[32]  G. Duysters,et al.  The technological origins of radical inventions , 2010 .

[33]  Manuel Trajtenberg,et al.  AS A SOURCE OF COMMERCIAL TECHNOLOGY : A DETAILED ANALYSIS OF UNIVERSITY PATENTING , 1965 – 1988 , 1995 .

[34]  Kwanghui Lim The relationship between research and innovation in the semiconductor and pharmaceutical industries (1981-1997) , 2004 .

[35]  Koenraad Debackere,et al.  Developing Technology in the Vicinity of Science: An Examination of the Relationship between Science Intensity (of Patents) and Technological Productivity within the Field of Biotechnology , 2006 .

[36]  N. Rosenberg Why do firms do basic research (with their own money) , 1990 .

[37]  Reinhilde Veugelers,et al.  On Young Highly Innovative Companies: Why They Matter and How (Not) to Policy Support Them , 2010 .

[38]  Lee G. Branstetter,et al.  THE RESTRUCTURING OF JAPANESE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT: THE INCREASING IMPACT OF SCIENCE ON JAPANESE R&D ∗ , 2004 .

[39]  O. Sorenson,et al.  Science as a Map in Technological Search , 2000 .

[40]  Amalya L. Oliver,et al.  Social Networks, Learning, and Flexibility: Sourcing Scientific Knowledge in New Biotechnology Firms , 1994 .

[41]  Sam Arts,et al.  Path Dependency and Recombinant Exploration: How Established Firms Can Outperform in the Creation of Technological Breakthroughs , 2012 .

[42]  Paul A. David,et al.  The explicit economics of knowledge codification and tacitness , 2000 .

[43]  R. Chandy,et al.  The Incumbent's Curse? Incumbency, Size, and Radical Product Innovation , 2000 .

[44]  I. Cockburn,et al.  Absorptive Capacity, Coauthoring Behavior, and the Organization of Research in Drug Discovery , 2003 .

[45]  Alfonso Gambardella,et al.  Science and innovation: Science and innovation in pharmaceutical research , 1995 .

[46]  R. Tijssen Global and domestic utilization of industrial relevant science: patent citation analysis of science-technology interactions and knowledge flows , 2001 .

[47]  William J. Baumol,et al.  Entrepreneurial Enterprises, Large Established Firms and Other Components of the Free-Market Growth Machine , 2004 .

[48]  Colin Webb,et al.  Analysing European and International Patent Citations , 2005 .

[49]  Araújo,et al.  An Evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[50]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[51]  Reinhilde Veugelers,et al.  The Technological Origins and Novelty of Breakthrough Inventions , 2013 .

[52]  Karin Fladmoe-Lindquist,et al.  Breakthrough innovations in the U.S. biotechnology industry: the effects of technological space and geographic origin , 2006 .

[53]  Francis Narin,et al.  Citation rates to technologically important patents , 1981 .

[54]  Iain M. Cockburn,et al.  Is the Pharmaceutical Industry in a Productivity Crisis? , 2006, Innovation Policy and the Economy.

[55]  Jasjit Singh,et al.  Lone Inventors as Source of Breakthroughs: Myth or Reality? , 2009, Manag. Sci..

[56]  Roberto Fontana,et al.  Schumpeterian patterns of innovation and the sources of breakthrough inventions: evidence from a data-set of R&D awards , 2012 .

[57]  A. Nerkar,et al.  Beyond local search: boundary‐spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry , 2001 .

[58]  P. Danzon,et al.  Productivity in Pharmaceutical Biotechnology R&D: The Role of Experience and Alliances , 2003, Journal of health economics.

[59]  L. Fleming Recombinant Uncertainty in Technological Search Lee Fleming , 2001 .

[60]  J. Schumpeter,et al.  Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical, and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process , 1940 .

[61]  B. van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie,et al.  The Cost Factor in Patent Systems , 2006 .

[62]  Scott Shane,et al.  Technology Regimes and New Firm Formation , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[63]  R. Henderson Underinvestment and Incompetence as Responses to Radical Innovation: Evidence From the Photolithographic Alignment Equipment Industry , 2015 .

[64]  M. Trajtenberg A Penny for Your Quotes : Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations , 1990 .

[65]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Exploring the Black Box: Technology, Economics, and History , 1994 .

[66]  R. Nelson The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research , 1959, Journal of Political Economy.

[67]  O. Morgenstern,et al.  Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical, and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process. , 1940 .

[68]  Cecil D. Quillen,et al.  Continuing Patent Applications and Performance of the U.S. Patent Office , 2001 .