Benchmarking and incentive regulation of quality of service: an application to the UK electricity distribution networks

Quality of service has emerged as an important issue in post-reform regulation of electricity distribution networks. Regulators have employed partial incentive schemes to promote cost saving, investment efficiency, and service quality. This paper presents a quality-incorporated benchmarking study of the electricity distribution utilities in the UK between 1991/92 and 1998/99. We calculate technical efficiency of the utilities using Data Envelopment Analysis technique and productivity change over time using quality-incorporated Malmquist indices. We find that cost efficient firms do not necessarily exhibit high service quality and that efficiency scores of cost-only models do not show high correlation with those of quality-based models. The results also show that improvements in service quality have made a significant contribution to the sector’s total productivity change. In addition, we show that integrating quality of service in regulatory benchmarking is preferable to cost-only approaches.

[1]  J. Heggset,et al.  Quality of supply in the deregulated Norwegian power system , 2001, 2001 IEEE Porto Power Tech Proceedings (Cat. No.01EX502).

[2]  S. Littlechild,et al.  The Regulation of Privatized Monopolies in the United Kingdom , 1989 .

[3]  Thomas G. Weyman-Jones,et al.  COST FUNCTIONS AND COST EFFICIENCY IN ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION: A STOCHASTIC FRONTIER APPROACH , 1996 .

[4]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[5]  R. Färe,et al.  The measurement of efficiency of production , 1985 .

[6]  Tooraj Jamasb,et al.  Gaming the Regulator: A Survey , 2003 .

[7]  A. Charnes,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis Theory, Methodology and Applications , 1995 .

[8]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  DEA and its use in the regulation of water companies , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[9]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[10]  M. Farrell.  The Measurement of Productive Efficiency , 1957 .

[11]  R. Färe,et al.  Productivity and quality changes in Swedish pharmacies , 1995 .

[12]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Introduction to the Theory and Application of Data Envelopment Analysis: A Foundation Text with Integrated Software , 2001 .

[13]  Timothy Coelli,et al.  An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis , 1997 .

[14]  Tooraj Jamasb,et al.  International Benchmarking and Yardstick Regulation: An Application to European Electricity Utilities , 2001 .

[15]  Tooraj Jamasb,et al.  International benchmarking and regulation: an application to European electricity distribution utilities , 2003 .

[16]  Suthathip Yaisawarng,et al.  The Effects of Sulfur Dioxide Controls on Productivity Change in the U.S. Electric Power Industry , 1994 .

[17]  M. Pollitt,et al.  Benchmarking and regulation: international electricity experience , 2000 .

[18]  John Kennedy,et al.  ASSESSING THE EFFICIENT COST OF SUSTAINING BRITAIN'S RAIL NETWORK: PERSPECTIVES BASED ON ZONAL COMPARISONS , 2004 .

[19]  R. Färe,et al.  Productivity Developments in Swedish Hospitals: A Malmquist Output Index Approach , 1994 .

[20]  Gerhard Clemenz,et al.  Optimal Price Cap Regulation , 1991 .

[21]  REGULATION OF QUALITY OF INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES , 2000 .

[22]  A. Shleifer,et al.  A Theory of Yardstick Competition , 1985 .