Making Process Visible: A Grammatical Approach to Managing Design Processes

This paper presents a novel framework for managing design processes using a formal grammar as the theoretical foundation to represent, manipulate and execute design processes. The grammatical approach allows designers to represent a complex activity concisely with a small number of higher-level tasks and to explore alternative processes within a space of feasible alternatives. These capabilities allow the engineers to visualize the design process so that they can fully understand the alternative methods before making any design decisions. The framework, called MIDAS, includes separate layers for process specification and execution. Using the process specification layer, designers can capture the overall design process and each designer can understand his or her task with respect to the whole design process. In the process execution layer, design tasks are executed according to the information in specification layer so that designers can be informed of the current design status, alternative design methods, and their impacts in a whole design process. The framework has the potential to improve design productivity by accessing, reusing, and revising previous processes for a similar design. We use a gearbox design process to demonstrate the framework.

[1]  A. Richard Newton,et al.  WELD—an environment for Web-based electronic design , 1998, DAC.

[2]  Peter R. Sutton,et al.  Framework encapsulations: a new approach to CAD tool interoperability , 1998, DAC.

[3]  Jean-Marc Andreoli,et al.  XPECT: A Framework for Electronic Commerce , 1997, IEEE Internet Comput..

[4]  Mark R. Cutkosky,et al.  Madefast: collaborative engineering over the Internet , 1996, CACM.

[5]  Jami J. Shah,et al.  Database infrastructure for supporting engineering design histories , 1996, Comput. Aided Des..

[6]  Moon Jung Chung,et al.  Managing engineering data for complex products , 1995 .

[7]  Gilles Brassard,et al.  Algorithmics - theory and practice , 1988 .

[8]  Moon-Jung Chung,et al.  A Formal Approach to Managing Design Processes , 1995, Computer.

[9]  Charles J. Petrie,et al.  Agent-Based Engineering, the Web, and Intelligence , 1996, IEEE Expert.

[10]  Frank Maurer,et al.  Knowledge-Based Techniques to Increase the Flexibility of Workflow Management , 1997, Data Knowl. Eng..

[11]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  GGREADA: A graph grammar-based machine design algorithm , 1997 .

[12]  Joachim Altmeyer,et al.  Modeling design tasks and tools: the link between product and flow model , 1997, DAC.

[13]  James R. Rinderle.  Grammatical approaches to engineering design, part II: Melding configuration and parametric design using attribute grammars , 1991 .

[14]  Susan Finger,et al.  Conversions of Feature-Based Design Representations Using Graph Grammar Parsing , 1994 .

[15]  Scott Huston Mullins,et al.  Grammatical approaches to engineering design, part I: An introduction and commentary , 1991 .

[16]  Robert P. Smith,et al.  A predictive model of sequential iteration in engineering design , 1997 .

[17]  Tim Berners-Lee,et al.  The World-Wide Web , 1994, CACM.

[18]  Kevin B. Kenny,et al.  Implementing shared manufacturing services on the World-Wide Web , 1996, CACM.

[19]  Brian T. Pentland,et al.  Grammatical Models of Organizational Processes , 1995 .

[20]  Daniel E. Whitney,et al.  Why mechanical design cannot be like VLSI design , 1996 .

[21]  Craig Schlenoff,et al.  Unified Process Specification Language: Requirements for Modeling Process , 1996 .

[22]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  Tools for Inventing Organizations: Toward a Handbook of Organizational Processes , 1999 .

[23]  Erik K. Antonsson,et al.  The potential for mechanical design compilation , 1997 .

[24]  David W. Knapp,et al.  The ADAM design planning engine , 1991, IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst..

[25]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  Recursive annealing: A computational model for machine design , 1995 .