Exploring healthcare professionals' perspective of the process of obtaining consent for adult patient's having planned surgery: A scoping review.

AIM The aim of this scoping review was to provide an overview of the literature about the process of obtaining consent from adult patients undergoing planned surgery from the healthcare professionals' perspective and analyse knowledge gaps. BACKGROUND The process of obtaining consent for planned elective surgery manifests an individual's fundamental right to decide what happens to their body. The process is often suboptimal and problematic, placing a significant resource burden on health systems globally. Deficiencies in the documentation on consent forms have also been shown to increase the risk of operating room error. DESIGN Scoping review. METHODS Arksey and O'Malley's (International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8, 2005 and 19) five-step scoping review methodology was used. RESULTS Fifty-three articles were included; 39 primary and 14 secondary research publications. Three key findings were identified; there is currently low-level evidence about surgical consent processes to inform clinical practice; junior doctors obtain surgical consent frequently, yet this process was likely undertaken sub-optimally; and current knowledge gaps include capacity assessment, decision-making and pre-procedural consent checks. CONCLUSION Planned surgical consent processes are complex, and both surgeons and perioperative nurses are essential during the process. While surgeons have responsibility to obtain consent, perioperative nurses provide a safety net in the surgical consent process checking the surgical consent information is correct and has been understood by the patient. Such actions may influence consent validity and patient safety in the operating room. Knowledge gaps about capacity assessment, decision-making, pre-procedural checks and the impact of junior doctors obtaining consent on patient understanding, safety and legal claims are evident. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE This review highlights the importance of the surgical nurse's role in the planned surgical consent process. While the responsibility for obtaining surgical consent lies with the surgeon, the nurse's role verifying consent information is crucial as they act as a safety net and can reduce error in the operating room. NO PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION The authors declare that no patient or public contribution was made to this review in accordance with the aim to map existing literature from the healthcare professionals' perspective.

[1]  L. Hutzler,et al.  Assessing the Adequacy and Readability of Surgical Consents in Orthopedic Surgery. , 2022, Bulletin of the Hospital for Joint Disease.

[2]  Lisa M. Kodadek,et al.  Surrogate consent for surgery among older adult patients. , 2022, Surgery.

[3]  A. Salvator,et al.  How Informed Is Your Informed Consent: Evaluating Differences Between Resident and Attending Obtained Consents for Cholecystectomy. , 2022, Journal of surgical education.

[4]  M. Remacle,et al.  Informed consent for suspension microlaryngoscopy: what should we tell the patient? A consensus statement of the European Laryngological Society , 2022, European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology.

[5]  Munish C. Gupta,et al.  Surgeons’ risk perception in ASD surgery: The value of objective risk assessment on decision making and patient counselling , 2022, European Spine Journal.

[6]  Andrew Nigh,et al.  Utilizing the “teach-back” method to improve surgical informed consent and shared decision-making: a review , 2022, Patient Safety in Surgery.

[7]  Young Tae Kim,et al.  Informed consent forms for gynecologic cancer surgery: recommendations from the Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology , 2022, Obstetrics & gynecology science.

[8]  I. Incoll,et al.  Informed consent: perceptions and practice of orthopaedic trainees , 2022, ANZ journal of surgery.

[9]  A. de Costa,et al.  Junior doctor experiences and challenges in obtaining surgical informed consent: A qualitative systematic review & meta-ethnography. , 2021, The Journal of surgical research.

[10]  Kristin L. Long,et al.  Informed Consent and Informed Decision-Making in High-Risk Surgery: A Quantitative Analysis. , 2021, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[11]  E. Mayo-Wilson,et al.  The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews , 2021, BMJ.

[12]  Julie Taylor,et al.  Scoping reviews: the PAGER framework for improving the quality of reporting , 2021, International Journal of Social Research Methodology.

[13]  Jennifer A. Villwock,et al.  Educational Informed Consent Video Equivalent to Standard Verbal Consent for Rhinologic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2021, American journal of rhinology & allergy.

[14]  D. Chu,et al.  Patient, Nurse, Medical Assistant, and Surgeon Perspectives Inform the Development of a Decision Support Tool for Inguinal Hernia Surgery: A Qualitative Analysis. , 2021, American journal of surgery.

[15]  T. Saclarides,et al.  Surgical Residents' Perspective on Informed Consent-How Does It Compare With Attending Surgeons? , 2020, The Journal of surgical research.

[16]  M. Politi,et al.  A Practical Guideline for the Implementation of Shared Decision-making in Complex Ventral Incisional Hernia Repair. , 2020, The Journal of surgical research.

[17]  Sarah J White,et al.  Consent for spine surgery: an observational study , 2020, ANZ journal of surgery.

[18]  S. Jeyarajah,et al.  Chronic groin pain following open inguinal hernia repair: has consenting practice improved? , 2020, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.

[19]  R. Lunevicius,et al.  Evaluating the Patient and Setting-Specific Factors That Influenced the Quality of Informed Consent in a Retrospective Cohort of Subtotal Cholecystectomy Patients. , 2020, Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A.

[20]  M. Clarke,et al.  The patient and clinician experience of informed consent for surgery: a systematic review of the qualitative evidence , 2020, BMC Medical Ethics.

[21]  S. Chintapatla,et al.  A multistage process leading to the development of a structured consent form and patient information leaflet for complex abdominal wall reconstruction (CAWR) , 2020, Hernia.

[22]  S. Kalipershad,et al.  Is there a standardised consent process within the surgical specialties? , 2020, The surgeon : journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland.

[23]  V. Palda,et al.  Surgeon clinical practice variation and patient preferences during the informed consent discussion: a mixed-methods analysis in lumbar spine surgery. , 2020, Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie.

[24]  H. Krumholz,et al.  Quality of informed consent documents among US. hospitals: a cross-sectional study , 2020, BMJ Open.

[25]  K. Hammermeister,et al.  Systematic Review of Preoperative Risk Discussion in Practice. , 2020, Journal of surgical education.

[26]  P. Ekmekci,et al.  Does content of informed consent forms make surgeons vulnerable to lawsuits? , 2020, Asian journal of surgery.

[27]  A. Prince,et al.  Shared decision-making in vascular surgery. , 2019, Journal of vascular surgery.

[28]  R. Førde,et al.  Lack of informed consent for surgical procedures by elderly patients with inability to consent: a retrospective chart review from an academic medical center in Norway , 2019, Patient Safety in Surgery.

[29]  N. Tolley,et al.  A critical review of thyroidectomy consent in the UK. , 2019, International journal of surgery.

[30]  M. Murray,et al.  ‘All by myself’: interns’ reports of their experiences taking consent in Irish hospitals , 2019, Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -).

[31]  D. Sokol,et al.  Informed consent: the view from the trenches , 2019, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.

[32]  Saadoun F. Alazmi Public and private surgeon attitude towards informed consent , 2018, Alexandria Journal of Medicine.

[33]  J. Cashman,et al.  Consent documentation for elective orthopaedic surgery , 2018, Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -).

[34]  W. Leclercq,et al.  Insight in Information Provision Prior to Obtaining Surgical Informed Consent—by Audiotaping Outpatient Consultations , 2018, World Journal of Surgery.

[35]  B. Rogers,et al.  Consenting patients for orthopaedic surgery: Is there need for change? , 2018, Journal of perioperative practice.

[36]  M. Courtney,et al.  Pre-made consent for elective inguinal hernia repair: the need for standardisation—a survey of all UK NHS Trusts , 2018, Hernia.

[37]  J. Donovan,et al.  Core information set for informed consent to surgery for oral or oropharyngeal cancer: A mixed‐methods study , 2018, Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery.

[38]  D. Kosuge,et al.  Customizable pre-printed consent forms: a solution in light of the Montgomery ruling. , 2018, British journal of hospital medicine.

[39]  F. Pakzad,et al.  Completion of hand-written surgical consent forms is frequently suboptimal and could be improved by using electronically generated, procedure-specific forms. , 2017, The surgeon : journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland.

[40]  B. Gillespie,et al.  Surgical consent and the importance of a substitute decision-maker: A case study , 2017 .

[41]  O. Faiz,et al.  Informing the process of consent for surgery: identification of key constructs and quality factors. , 2017, The Journal of surgical research.

[42]  Daohai Yu,et al.  An Informed Consent Program Enhances Surgery Resident Education. , 2017, Journal of surgical education.

[43]  S. Houterman,et al.  Challenging the knowledge base and skillset for providing surgical consent by orthopedic and plastic surgeons in the Netherlands: an identified area of improvement in patient safety , 2016, Patient Safety in Surgery.

[44]  E. Crosetti,et al.  Open partial horizontal laryngectomies: is it time to adopt a modular form of consent for the intervention? , 2016, Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale.

[45]  G. Elwyn,et al.  Doctors’ perspectives of informed consent for non‐emergency surgical procedures: a qualitative interview study , 2016, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[46]  K. Ford,et al.  Learning from lawsuits: Ten-years of NHS litigation authority claims against 11 surgical specialities in England. , 2016, The surgeon : journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland.

[47]  M. McAlinden,et al.  An audit of consent for allograft use in elective orthopaedic surgery. , 2016, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.

[48]  Sylwia Tichanow,et al.  Wrong Site Surgery: A Critical Incident Analysis of a near Miss , 2016, Journal of perioperative practice.

[49]  M. Fine,et al.  Do surgeons and patients discuss what they document on consent forms? , 2015, The Journal of surgical research.

[50]  D. McGrogan,et al.  Content, accuracy and completeness of patient consent in a regional vascular surgery unit , 2015, Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -).

[51]  D. Studdert,et al.  When informed consent goes poorly: a descriptive study of medical negligence claims and patient complaints , 2011, The Medical journal of Australia.

[52]  John R Clarke,et al.  Wrong site surgery near misses and actual occurrences. , 2009, AORN journal.

[53]  H. Arksey,et al.  Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework , 2005 .

[54]  L. Skene,et al.  Informed consent: lessons from Australia , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[55]  Graeme Thompson,et al.  Randomized trial of laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedure‐specific consent form , 2018, ANZ journal of surgery.

[56]  V. Vaswani,et al.  Comparative Study of Gap Analysis between Patient and Surgeon about Informed Consent to a Procedure , 2017 .

[57]  A. Rao,et al.  Wrong site surgery! How can we stop it? , 2014, Urology annals.