Embedded Clinical Decision Support in Electronic Health Record Decreases Use of High‐cost Imaging in the Emergency Department: EmbED study

OBJECTIVE The objective was to evaluate the impact of evidence-based clinical decision support tools integrated directly into provider workflow in the electronic health record on utilization of computed tomography (CT) brain, C-spine, and pulmonary embolism (PE). METHODS Validated, well-accepted scoring tools for head injury, C-spine injury, and PE were embedded into the electronic health record in a manner minimally disruptive to provider workflow. This was a longitudinal, before/after study in five emergency departments (EDs) in a healthcare system with a common electronic health record. Attending ED physicians practicing during the entire study period were included. The main outcome measure was proportion of CTs ordered by provider (total number of CT scans of a given type divided by total patients seen by that provider) in aggregate in the pre- and post intervention period. RESULTS There were 235,858 total patient visits analyzed in this study with an absolute decrease of 6,106 CT scan ordering for the three studies. Across all sites, there was greater than 6% decrease in utilization of CT brain and CT C-spine (-10%, 95% CI = -13% to -7%, p < 0.001; and -6%, 95% CI =-11% to -1%, p = 0.03, respectively). The use of CT PE also decreased but was not significant (-2%, 95% CI = -9% to +5%, p = 0.42). For all CT types, high utilizers in the pre-intervention period decreased usage over 14% in the post-intervention period with CT brain (-18%, 95% CI = -22% to -15%, p < 0.001), CT C-spine (-14%, 95% CI = -20% to -8%, p = 0.001), and CT PE (-23%, 95% CI = -31% to -14%, p < 0.001). For all three studies, the average utilizers did not change their usage practices. For CT brain, the low utilizers also did not increase usage but for CT C-spine and CT PE usage was increased (+29%, 95% CI = 10% to 52%, p = 0.003; and +46%, 95% CI = 26% to 70%, p < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION Embedded clinical decision support is associated with decreased overall utilization of high-cost imaging, especially among higher utilizers. It also affected low utilizers, increasing their usage consistent with improved adherence to guidelines, but this effect did not offset the overall decreased utilization for CT brain or CT C-spine. Thus, integrating clinical decision support into the provider workflow promotes usage of validated tools across providers, which can standardize the delivery of care and improve compliance with evidence-based guidelines.

[1]  A. Verhagen,et al.  Accuracy of the Canadian C-spine rule and NEXUS to screen for clinically important cervical spine injury in patients following blunt trauma: a systematic review , 2012, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[2]  A. Venkatesh,et al.  A top-five list for emergency medicine: a pilot project to improve the value of emergency care. , 2014, JAMA internal medicine.

[3]  A. Parsaik,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2011, Annals of emergency medicine.

[4]  R. Glasgow,et al.  Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. , 1999, American journal of public health.

[5]  Marion Smits,et al.  External validation of the Canadian CT Head Rule and the New Orleans Criteria for CT scanning in patients with minor head injury. , 2005, JAMA.

[6]  G. Gaddis,et al.  Toward Improved Implementation of Evidence-based Clinical Algorithms: Clinical Practice Guidelines, Clinical Decision Rules, and Clinical Pathways , 2007 .

[7]  Jeremy Grimshaw,et al.  Implementation Science STUDY PROTOCOL Open Access , 2022 .

[8]  A Laupacis,et al.  The Canadian C-spine rule for radiography in alert and stable trauma patients. , 2001, JAMA.

[9]  E. Panacek,et al.  Test performance of the individual NEXUS low-risk clinical screening criteria for cervical spine injury. , 2001, Annals of emergency medicine.

[10]  H. Krumholz,et al.  National trends in use of computed tomography in the emergency department. , 2011, Annals of emergency medicine.

[11]  George A Wells,et al.  The Canadian CT Head Rule for patients with minor head injury , 2001, The Lancet.

[12]  Dorothy M Adcock,et al.  Prospective validation of Wells Criteria in the evaluation of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. , 2004, Annals of emergency medicine.

[13]  A. Sodickson,et al.  Radiology utilization in the emergency department: trends of the past 2 decades. , 2014, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[14]  S. T. G. Roup,et al.  Correction: Validity of a Set of Clinical Criteria to Rule out Injury to the Cervical Spine in Patients with Blunt Trauma. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.