Training changes processing of speech cues in older adults with hearing loss

Aging results in a loss of sensory function, and the effects of hearing impairment can be especially devastating due to reduced communication ability. Older adults with hearing loss report that speech, especially in noisy backgrounds, is uncomfortably loud yet unclear. Hearing loss results in an unbalanced neural representation of speech: the slowly-varying envelope is enhanced, dominating representation in the auditory pathway and perceptual salience at the cost of the rapidly-varying fine structure. We hypothesized that older adults with hearing loss can be trained to compensate for these changes in central auditory processing through directed attention to behaviorally-relevant speech sounds. To that end, we evaluated the effects of auditory-cognitive training in older adults (ages 55–79) with normal hearing and hearing loss. After training, the auditory training group with hearing loss experienced a reduction in the neural representation of the speech envelope presented in noise, approaching levels observed in normal hearing older adults. No changes were noted in the control group. Importantly, changes in speech processing were accompanied by improvements in speech perception. Thus, central processing deficits associated with hearing loss may be partially remediated with training, resulting in real-life benefits for everyday communication.

[1]  Adaptive plasticity in brainstem of adult listeners following earplug-induced deprivation. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  Alan R Palmer,et al.  Phase-locked responses to pure tones in the inferior colliculus. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  D. Robertson,et al.  Changes in neuronal activity and gene expression in guinea-pig auditory brainstem after unilateral partial hearing loss , 2009, Neuroscience.

[4]  L. Frölich,et al.  Impact of aging , 2007, NeuroMolecular Medicine.

[5]  S. Gordon-Salant,et al.  Frequency and temporal resolution in elderly listeners with good and poor word recognition. , 2000, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[6]  A. Walling,et al.  Hearing loss in older adults. , 2012, American family physician.

[7]  N. Kraus,et al.  Reversal of age-related neural timing delays with training , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Terence W. Picton,et al.  Envelope and spectral frequency-following responses to vowel sounds , 2008, Hearing Research.

[9]  Larry F Hughes,et al.  Affects of aging on receptive fields in rat primary auditory cortex layer V neurons. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  H. Dillon,et al.  The National Acoustic Laboratories' (NAL) New Procedure for Selecting the Gain and Frequency Response of a Hearing Aid , 1986, Ear and hearing.

[11]  Earl E. Johnson,et al.  A comparison of gain for adults from generic hearing aid prescriptive methods: impacts on predicted loudness, frequency bandwidth, and speech intelligibility. , 2011, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[12]  Christian Lorenzi,et al.  Speech identification based on temporal fine structure cues. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  Brainstem plasticity and modified loudness following short-term use of hearing aids. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  John O. Willis,et al.  Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence , 2014 .

[15]  Brian C J Moore,et al.  Speech perception problems of the hearing impaired reflect inability to use temporal fine structure , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  Dan H Sanes,et al.  The effect of bilateral deafness on excitatory and inhibitory synaptic strength in the inferior colliculus , 2002, The European journal of neuroscience.

[17]  L. Humes,et al.  Auditory and cognitive factors underlying individual differences in aided speech-understanding among older adults , 2013, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[18]  Nina Kraus,et al.  Assistive listening devices drive neuroplasticity in children with dyslexia , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  A. Wingfield,et al.  Hearing Loss in Older Adulthood , 2005 .

[20]  F. Collette,et al.  The impact of aging and hearing status on verbal short-term memory , 2014, Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition.

[21]  Nancy Mather,et al.  Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Cognitive Abilities. , 2009 .

[22]  Christopher J. Plack,et al.  Subcortical Plasticity Following Perceptual Learning in a Pitch Discrimination Task , 2011, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[23]  Shihab Shamma,et al.  On the balance of envelope and temporal fine structure in the encoding of speech in the early auditory system. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  Kenneth S Henry,et al.  Diminished temporal coding with sensorineural hearing loss emerges in background noise , 2012, Nature Neuroscience.

[25]  S. Gordon-Salant,et al.  Age-related differences in identification and discrimination of temporal cues in speech segments. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  Arthur Wingfield,et al.  Hearing Loss and Perceptual Effort: Downstream Effects on Older Adults’ Memory for Speech , 2005, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[27]  Richard A. Roberts,et al.  An adaptive clinical test of temporal resolution: Age effects , 2011, International journal of audiology.

[28]  B. Schneider,et al.  Implications of perceptual deterioration for cognitive aging research. , 2000 .

[29]  M. Kathleen Pichora-Fuller,et al.  Cognitive aging and auditory information processing , 2003, International journal of audiology.

[30]  C. Browning,et al.  Communication and psychosocial consequences of sensory loss in older adults: overview and rehabilitation directions , 2002, Disability and rehabilitation.

[31]  Executive Officer,et al.  National Acoustic Laboratories , 2005 .

[32]  Lee M. Miller,et al.  Methods to Eliminate Stimulus Transduction Artifact From Insert Earphones During Electroencephalography , 2012, Ear and hearing.

[33]  P. Souza,et al.  Effects of age and age-related hearing loss on the neural representation of speech cues , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[34]  J. Swaminathan,et al.  Psychophysiological Analyses Demonstrate the Importance of Neural Envelope Coding for Speech Perception in Noise , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[35]  L. Hughes,et al.  Aged-related loss of temporal processing: Altered responses to amplitude modulated tones in rat dorsal cochlear nucleus , 2008, Neuroscience.

[36]  R V Shannon,et al.  Speech Recognition with Primarily Temporal Cues , 1995, Science.

[37]  Nina Kraus,et al.  Effects of hearing loss on the subcortical representation of speech cues. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[38]  L. Hughes,et al.  Acoustic Experience Alters the Aged Auditory System , 2013, Ear and hearing.

[39]  Takeo Watanabe,et al.  Perceptual learning rules based on reinforcers and attention , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[40]  S. David,et al.  Does attention play a role in dynamic receptive field adaptation to changing acoustic salience in A1? , 2007, Hearing Research.

[41]  A. Krishnan,et al.  Aging alters the perception and physiological representation of frequency: Evidence from human frequency-following response recordings , 2010, Hearing Research.

[42]  N. Kraus,et al.  Aging Affects Neural Precision of Speech Encoding , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[43]  M. Merzenich,et al.  Recovery of functional and structural age-related changes in the rat primary auditory cortex with operant training , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[44]  Kristine Yaffe,et al.  A Cognitive Training Program Based on Principles of Brain Plasticity: Results from the Improvement in Memory with Plasticity‐based Adaptive Cognitive Training (IMPACT) Study , 2009, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[45]  Nina Kraus,et al.  Auditory brainstem response to complex sounds predicts self-reported speech-in-noise performance. , 2013, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[46]  Christian Lorenzi,et al.  Perception of temporal fine-structure cues in speech with minimal envelope cues for listeners with mild-to-moderate hearing loss , 2010, International journal of audiology.

[47]  Gavin M. Bidelman,et al.  Neural representation of pitch salience in the human brainstem revealed by psychophysical and electrophysiological indices , 2010, Hearing Research.

[48]  Rajeev D. S. Raizada,et al.  Challenge-Driven Attention: Interacting Frontal and Brainstem Systems , 2007, Frontiers in human neuroscience.

[49]  Su-Hyun Jin,et al.  Interrupted speech perception: the effects of hearing sensitivity and frequency resolution. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[50]  A. Wingfield,et al.  Neural processing during older adults' comprehension of spoken sentences: age differences in resource allocation and connectivity. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[51]  Brian C. J. Moore,et al.  Effect of loudness recruitment on the perception of amplitude modulation , 1996 .

[52]  J. Fritz,et al.  Active listening: Task-dependent plasticity of spectrotemporal receptive fields in primary auditory cortex , 2005, Hearing Research.

[53]  M. Killion,et al.  Development of a quick speech-in-noise test for measuring signal-to-noise ratio loss in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[54]  Christopher J. Plack,et al.  The Frequency Following Response (FFR) May Reflect Pitch-Bearing Information But is Not a Direct Representation of Pitch , 2011, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[55]  Dennis H. Klatt,et al.  Software for a cascade/parallel formant synthesizer , 1980 .

[56]  Michael G. Heinz,et al.  Envelope Coding in Auditory Nerve Fibers Following Noise-Induced Hearing Loss , 2010, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[57]  N. Kraus,et al.  Training to improve hearing speech in noise: biological mechanisms. , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[58]  Andrew J Oxenham,et al.  Masking release for low- and high-pass-filtered speech in the presence of noise and single-talker interference. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[59]  Asymmetry in the auditory brainstem response following experience of monaural amplification , 2007, Neuroreport.

[60]  R. P. Carlyon,et al.  Subcortical Neural Synchrony and Absolute Thresholds Predict Frequency Discrimination Independently , 2013, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[61]  Brian C J Moore,et al.  The effects of age and cochlear hearing loss on temporal fine structure sensitivity, frequency selectivity, and speech reception in noise. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[62]  J. Dubno,et al.  Effects of age and mild hearing loss on speech recognition in noise. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[63]  B. Moore.  The Role of Temporal Fine Structure Processing in Pitch Perception, Masking, and Speech Perception for Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired People , 2008, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[64]  T. Q. Irigaray,et al.  Intellectual abilities in Alzheimer's disease patients: Contributions from the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI) , 2010 .

[65]  J M Festen,et al.  Difficulties with speech intelligibility in noise in spite of a normal pure-tone audiogram. , 1990, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.