The Response Of Maize (ZEA mays L.) Grain Yield to Water and Nitrogen Supply in An Eastern Croatian Environment

During the 3-years study maize (Zea mays L.) production in the eastern Republic of Croatia suffered a great losses due to periods of flood (2010) and droughts (2011 and 2012). Excessive amount of water as well as lack of it caused variation of yield and efficiency of irrigation scheduling. Irrigation treatments included a rainfed treatment and irrigation up to soil water content 80-100% of field capacity. The nitrogen fertilization treatments were 0 (control) and 200 kg N/ha. The analyzed crop productivity parameters were 1000-grain mass and grain yield, in two hybrids. The irrigation significantly increased maize grain yield in dry years, while in extremely wet year 2010 yield in the irrigated plot was reduced doe to stress caused by excessive rainfall and over- irrigation. Both tested hybrids responded positively to the combination of nitrogen fertilizer and irrigation. Regardless of if expressed on fresh tissue or dry weight basis, proline content in maize leaf did not show clear effect of irrigation treatment, whereas nitrogen fertilization stimulated this amino acid accumulation. There was a close relationship established between proline in leaf dry matter in both growth stages and 1000- grain mass, as well as a weak relationship between this parameter at flowering and final grain yield.

[1]  M. Trovato,et al.  Proline accumulation in plants , 2009, Plant signaling & behavior.

[2]  V. VUČETIĆ,et al.  Modelling of maize production in Croatia: present and future climate , 2010, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[3]  Domagoj Mihajlović,et al.  Analysis of the extraordinary 2011/2012 drought in Croatia , 2015, Theoretical and Applied Climatology.

[4]  M. Foolad,et al.  Roles of glycine betaine and proline in improving plant abiotic stress resistance , 2007 .

[5]  Su Ki Ooi,et al.  Detecting maize leaf water status by using digital RGB images , 2014 .

[6]  Özge Çelik,et al.  Expression analysis of proline metabolism-related genes in salt-tolerant soybean mutant plants , 2013 .

[7]  Marcin Kozak,et al.  What about keeping plants well watered , 2014 .

[8]  Marija Špoljarević,et al.  Assessment of the influence of different sample processing and cold storage duration on plant free proline content analyses. , 2010, Phytochemical analysis : PCA.

[9]  Marko Josipović,et al.  Influences of irrigation and N fertilization on maize ( Zea mays L. ) properties , 2007 .

[10]  Michele Rinaldi,et al.  Yield response of corn to irrigation and nitrogen fertilization in a Mediterranean environment , 2008 .

[11]  A. Savouré,et al.  Proline: a multifunctional amino acid. , 2010, Trends in plant science.

[12]  Wilfried Claussen,et al.  Proline as a measure of stress in tomato plants , 2005 .

[13]  Baanda A. Salim,et al.  Effects of deficit irrigation scheduling on yields and soil water balance of irrigated maize , 2008, Irrigation Science.

[14]  Jorge Ibarra-Caballero,et al.  Proline Accumulation as a Symptom of Drought Stress in Maize: A Tissue Differentiation Requirement , 1988 .

[15]  Marko Josipović,et al.  Efficiency of maize irrigation scheduling in climate variability and extreme weather events in eastern Croatia , 2015 .

[16]  Altair Toledo Machado,et al.  Condutância estomática em milho em condições de deficiência de água e nitrogênio , 2007 .

[17]  Qasim Ali,et al.  Exogenously applied proline at different growth stages enhances growth of two maize cultivars grown under water deficit conditions , 2007 .

[18]  Helal Ragab Moussa,et al.  Comparative response of drought tolerant and drought sensitive maize genotypes to water stress , 2008 .

[19]  Christian Hermans,et al.  Proline accumulation in plants: a review , 2008, Amino Acids.

[20]  Ricardo Antunes Azevedo,et al.  Nitrogen use efficiency. 1. Uptake of nitrogen from the soil , 2006 .

[21]  R. Çakır.  Effect of water stress at different development stages on vegetative and reproductive growth of corn , 2004 .

[22]  A. Hall,et al.  Divergent selection for osmotic adjustment results in improved drought tolerance in maize (Zea mays L.) in both early growth and flowering phases , 2006 .

[23]  Marko Josipović,et al.  Impacts of irrigation and genotype on yield, protein, starch and oil contents in grain of maize inbred lines , 2014 .

[24]  Marija Špoljarević,et al.  The influences of genotype and soil on maize nutritional status and free proline content , 2008 .

[25]  B. Feil,et al.  Effects of pre-anthesis drought, nitrogen fertilizer rate, and variety on grain yield, yield components, and harvest index of tropical maize , 2006 .

[26]  L. S. Pereira,et al.  Crop evapotranspiration : guidelines for computing crop water requirements , 1998 .

[27]  M. Van Montagu,et al.  Environmental and developmental signals modulate proline homeostasis: evidence for a negative transcriptional regulator. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  Ivan Brkić,et al.  Irrigation, nitrogen fertilization and genotype impacts on yield and quality of maize grain , 2010 .

[29]  P. D. Hare,et al.  Metabolic implications of stress-induced proline accumulation in plants , 1997, Plant Growth Regulation.

[30]  Dejan Agić,et al.  The relationship of proline content and metabolism on the productivity of maize plants , 2011, Plant signaling & behavior.

[31]  Seyed Farhad Saberali,et al.  Maize yield response to deficit irrigation during low-sensitive growth stages and nitrogen rate under semi-arid climatic conditions , 2010 .