Variations in the Quality of Care at Large Public Hospitals in Beijing, China: A Condition-Based Outcome Approach

Background Public hospitals deliver over ninety percent of all outpatient and inpatient services in China. Their quality is graded into three levels (A, B, and C) largely based on structural resources, but empirical evidence on the quality of process and outcome of care is extremely scarce. As expectations for quality care rise with higher living standards and cost of care, such evidence is urgently needed and vital to improve care and to inform future health reforms. Methods We compiled and analyzed a multicenter database of over 4 million inpatient discharge summary records to provide a comprehensive assessment of the level and variations in clinical outcomes of hospitalization at 39 tertiary hospitals in Beijing. We assessed six outcome measures of clinical quality: in-hospital mortality rates (RSMR) for AMI, stroke, pneumonia and CABG, post-procedural complication rate (RS-CR), and failure-to-rescue rate (RS-FTR). The measures were adjusted for pre-admission patient case-mix using indirect standardization method with hierarchical linear mixed models. Results We found good overall quality with large variations by hospital and condition (mean/range, in %): RSMR-AMI: 6.23 (2.37–14.48), RSMR-stroke: 4.18 (3.58–4.44), RSMR-pneumonia: 7.78 (7.20–8.59), RSMR-CABG: 1.93 (1.55–2.23), RS-CR: 11.38 (9.9–12.88), and RS-FTR: 6.41 (5.17–7.58). Hospital grade was not significantly associated with any risk-adjusted outcome measures. Conclusions Going to a higher grade public hospital does not always lead to better patient outcome because hospital grade only contains information about hospital structural resources. A hospital report card with some outcome measures of quality would provide valuable information to patients in choosing providers, and for regulators to identify gaps in health care quality. Reducing the variations in clinical practice and patient outcome should be a focus for policy makers in the next round of health sector reforms in China.

[1]  S. Normand,et al.  Comparison of Hospital Risk-Standardized Mortality Rates Calculated by Using In-Hospital and 30-Day Models: An Observational Study With Implications for Hospital Profiling , 2012, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[2]  E. Bradley,et al.  Quality of care in low- and middle-income settings: what next? , 2012, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[3]  P. Engelfriet,et al.  Population trends and inequalities in incidence and short-term outcome of acute myocardial infarction between 1998 and 2007. , 2013, International journal of cardiology.

[4]  Therese Hesketh,et al.  Violence against doctors in China , 2012, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[5]  H. Quan,et al.  Coding Algorithms for Defining Comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 Administrative Data , 2005, Medical care.

[6]  S. Normand,et al.  An Administrative Claims Model Suitable for Profiling Hospital Performance Based on 30-Day Mortality Rates Among Patients With an Acute Myocardial Infarction , 2006, Circulation.

[7]  P. Laake,et al.  Comparing hospital mortality – how to count does matter for patients hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), stroke and hip fracture , 2012, BMC Health Services Research.

[8]  C. Steiner,et al.  Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data. , 1998, Medical care.

[9]  C. Christiansen,et al.  Comparison of In-Hospital Versus 30-Day Mortality Assessments for Selected Medical Conditions , 2010, Medical care.

[10]  Fei Wang,et al.  Control Costs, Enhance Quality, and Increase Revenue in Three Top General Public Hospitals in Beijing, China , 2013, PloS one.

[11]  J. Hibbard,et al.  An experiment shows that a well-designed report on costs and quality can help consumers choose high-value health care. , 2012, Health affairs.

[12]  B. Mackert,et al.  Factors influencing in-hospital mortality and morbidity in patients treated on a stroke unit , 2011, Neurology.

[13]  E John Orav,et al.  The inverse relationship between mortality rates and performance in the Hospital Quality Alliance measures. , 2007, Health affairs.

[14]  Judith H Hibbard,et al.  Does publicizing hospital performance stimulate quality improvement efforts? , 2003, Health affairs.

[15]  C. Pepine,et al.  Gender differences in the treatment for acute myocardial infarction: bias or biology? , 2007, Circulation.

[16]  N. Nagelkerke,et al.  Gender Disparities in the Presentation, Management and Outcomes of Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients: Data from the 2nd Gulf Registry of Acute Coronary Events (Gulf RACE-2) , 2013, PloS one.

[17]  Thomas A. Louis,et al.  Statistical Issues in Assessing Hospital Performance , 2012 .

[18]  Sean M. O'Brien,et al.  Evaluation of failure to rescue as a quality metric in pediatric heart surgery: an analysis of the STS Congenital Heart Surgery Database. , 2012, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[19]  Sankey V. Williams,et al.  Hospital and Patient Characteristics Associated With Death After Surgery: A Study of Adverse Occurrence and Failure to Rescue , 1992, Medical care.

[20]  Kenta Ito,et al.  Trends in acute myocardial infarction incidence and mortality over 30 years in Japan: report from the MIYAGI-AMI Registry Study. , 2010, Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society.

[21]  J. Birkmeyer,et al.  Complications, Failure to Rescue, and Mortality With Major Inpatient Surgery in Medicare Patients , 2009, Annals of surgery.