Patent citation network in nanotechnology (1976–2004)

The patent citation networks are described using critical node, core network, and network topological analysis. The main objective is understanding of the knowledge transfer processes between technical fields, institutions and countries. This includes identifying key influential players and subfields, the knowledge transfer patterns among them, and the overall knowledge transfer efficiency. The proposed framework is applied to the field of nanoscale science and engineering (NSE), including the citation networks of patent documents, submitting institutions, technology fields, and countries. The NSE patents were identified by keywords “full-text” searching of patents at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). The analysis shows that the United States is the most important citation center in NSE research. The institution citation network illustrates a more efficient knowledge transfer between institutions than a random network. The country citation network displays a knowledge transfer capability as efficient as a random network. The technology field citation network and the patent document citation network exhibit a␣less efficient knowledge diffusion capability than a random network. All four citation networks show a tendency to form local citation clusters.

[1]  Robin Cowan,et al.  Network Structure and the Diffusion of Knowledge , 2004 .

[2]  C. Peterson,et al.  Topological properties of citation and metabolic networks. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[3]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[4]  Richard Taylor,et al.  Knowledge diffusion dynamics and network properties of face-to-face interactions , 2004 .

[5]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Statistical mechanics of complex networks , 2001, ArXiv.

[6]  Koenraad Debackere,et al.  Science cited in patents: A geographic "flow" analysis of bibliographic citation patterns in patents , 2003, Scientometrics.

[7]  G. Lewison Gastroenterology research in the United Kingdom: funding sources and impact , 1998, Gut.

[8]  Martin Meyer,et al.  Patent Citations in a Novel Field of Technology — What Can They Tell about Interactions between Emerging Communities of Science and Technology? , 2000, Scientometrics.

[9]  Martin S. Meyer,et al.  Patent citation analysis in a novel field of technology:An exploration of nano-science and nano-technology , 2001, Scientometrics.

[10]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[11]  Emden R. Gansner,et al.  An open graph visualization system and its applications to software engineering , 2000 .

[12]  Zan Huang,et al.  International nanotechnology development in 2003: Country, institution, and technology field analysis based on USPTO patent database , 2004 .

[13]  Zan Huang,et al.  Longitudinal Patent Analysis for Nanoscale Science and Engineering: Country, Institution and Technology Field , 2003 .

[14]  Alok K. Chakrabarti,et al.  Interorganizational transfer of knowledge: an analysis of patent citations of a defense firm , 1991 .

[15]  M.M.S. Karki,et al.  Patent citation analysis: A policy analysis tool , 1997 .

[16]  Chaomei Chen,et al.  Tracing knowledge diffusion , 2004, Scientometrics.

[17]  MU-HSUAN HUANG,et al.  Constructing a patent citation map using bibliographic coupling: A study of Taiwan's high-tech companies , 2003, Scientometrics.

[18]  S. Redner How popular is your paper? An empirical study of the citation distribution , 1998, cond-mat/9804163.