Dynamic Mechanisms of Cell Rigidity Sensing: Insights from a Computational Model of Actomyosin Networks

Cells modulate themselves in response to the surrounding environment like substrate elasticity, exhibiting structural reorganization driven by the contractility of cytoskeleton. The cytoskeleton is the scaffolding structure of eukaryotic cells, playing a central role in many mechanical and biological functions. It is composed of a network of actins, actin cross-linking proteins (ACPs), and molecular motors. The motors generate contractile forces by sliding couples of actin filaments in a polar fashion, and the contractile response of the cytoskeleton network is known to be modulated also by external stimuli, such as substrate stiffness. This implies an important role of actomyosin contractility in the cell mechano-sensing. However, how cells sense matrix stiffness via the contractility remains an open question. Here, we present a 3-D Brownian dynamics computational model of a cross-linked actin network including the dynamics of molecular motors and ACPs. The mechano-sensing properties of this active network are investigated by evaluating contraction and stress in response to different substrate stiffness. Results demonstrate two mechanisms that act to limit internal stress: (i) In stiff substrates, motors walk until they exert their maximum force, leading to a plateau stress that is independent of substrate stiffness, whereas (ii) in soft substrates, motors walk until they become blocked by other motors or ACPs, leading to submaximal stress levels. Therefore, this study provides new insights into the role of molecular motors in the contraction and rigidity sensing of cells.

[1]  Jianping Fu,et al.  Cell shape and substrate rigidity both regulate cell stiffness. , 2011, Biophysical journal.

[2]  D. Discher,et al.  Optimal matrix rigidity for stress fiber polarization in stem cells. , 2010, Nature physics.

[3]  Roger D. Kamm,et al.  Computational Analysis of Viscoelastic Properties of Crosslinked Actin Networks , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[4]  Y. Sheng,et al.  Keratin 8/18 Regulation of Cell Stiffness-Extracellular Matrix Interplay through Modulation of Rho-Mediated Actin Cytoskeleton Dynamics , 2012, PloS one.

[5]  Marion Ghibaudo,et al.  Traction forces and rigidity sensing regulate cell functions , 2008 .

[6]  Boris Martinac,et al.  Mechanosensitive ion channels: molecules of mechanotransduction , 2004, Journal of Cell Science.

[7]  C. Kung,et al.  A possible unifying principle for mechanosensation , 2005, Nature.

[8]  W Herzog,et al.  Length dependence of active force production in skeletal muscle. , 1999, Journal of applied physiology.

[9]  Micah Dembo,et al.  Regulation of mechanical interactions between fibroblasts and the substratum by stretch-activated Ca2+ entry , 2004, Journal of Cell Science.

[10]  S. Sen,et al.  Matrix Elasticity Directs Stem Cell Lineage Specification , 2006, Cell.

[11]  D A Weitz,et al.  Prestressed F-actin networks cross-linked by hinged filamins replicate mechanical properties of cells. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  Philippe Marcq,et al.  Rigidity sensing explained by active matter theory. , 2011, Biophysical journal.

[13]  Dennis Discher,et al.  Substrate compliance versus ligand density in cell on gel responses. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[14]  D. E. Discher,et al.  Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage — Soluble factors that limit osteogenesis , 2009 .

[15]  A. Arner,et al.  Blebbistatin specifically inhibits actin-myosin interaction in mouse cardiac muscle. , 2007, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[16]  J. Sellers,et al.  Mechanism of Blebbistatin Inhibition of Myosin II* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[17]  Ulrich S Schwarz,et al.  Focal adhesions as mechanosensors: the two-spring model. , 2006, Bio Systems.

[18]  Y. Wang,et al.  Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by substrate flexibility. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  Pascal Silberzan,et al.  Is the mechanical activity of epithelial cells controlled by deformations or forces? , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[20]  D. Discher,et al.  Elasticity of native and cross-linked polyelectrolyte multilayer films. , 2004, Biomacromolecules.

[21]  Alain Richert,et al.  Real-time single-cell response to stiffness , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  U. Schwarz,et al.  Cell organization in soft media due to active mechanosensing , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  M. Dembo,et al.  Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[24]  Rainer H A Fink,et al.  Molecular motors: force and movement generated by single myosin II molecules. , 2002, News in physiological sciences : an international journal of physiology produced jointly by the International Union of Physiological Sciences and the American Physiological Society.

[25]  P. Janmey,et al.  Tissue Cells Feel and Respond to the Stiffness of Their Substrate , 2005, Science.

[26]  Ilpo Vattulainen,et al.  Strain hardening, avalanches, and strain softening in dense cross-linked actin networks. , 2008, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[27]  Adam J. Engler,et al.  Myotubes differentiate optimally on substrates with tissue-like stiffness , 2004, The Journal of cell biology.

[28]  Ben Fabry,et al.  Single-cell response to stiffness exhibits muscle-like behavior , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  Léa Trichet,et al.  Evidence of a large-scale mechanosensing mechanism for cellular adaptation to substrate stiffness , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  Thomas A. McMahon,et al.  Muscles, Reflexes, and Locomotion , 1984 .

[31]  Roger D. Kamm,et al.  Computational Analysis of a Cross-linked Actin-like Network , 2009 .

[32]  D. Discher,et al.  Cell shape, spreading symmetry, and the polarization of stress-fibers in cells , 2010, Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal.

[33]  Roger D Kamm,et al.  Dynamic role of cross-linking proteins in actin rheology. , 2011, Biophysical journal.

[34]  Stephanie J Bryant,et al.  The effects of substrate stiffness on the in vitro activation of macrophages and in vivo host response to poly(ethylene glycol)-based hydrogels. , 2012, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[35]  Pascal Silberzan,et al.  Traction forces exerted through N‐cadherin contacts , 2006, Biology of the cell.

[36]  Sean X. Sun,et al.  A mechanical model of actin stress fiber formation and substrate elasticity sensing in adherent cells , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  F. Silver,et al.  Mechanosensing and mechanochemical transduction: how is mechanical energy sensed and converted into chemical energy in an extracellular matrix? , 2003, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[38]  D. Fletcher,et al.  An AFM-Based Stiffness Clamp for Dynamic Control of Rigidity , 2011, PloS one.

[39]  D. Lauffenburger,et al.  Migration of tumor cells in 3D matrices is governed by matrix stiffness along with cell-matrix adhesion and proteolysis. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  P. Hersen,et al.  Strength dependence of cadherin-mediated adhesions. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[41]  P. Iglesias,et al.  Mechanosensing through Cooperative Interactions between Myosin II and the Actin Crosslinker Cortexillin I , 2009, Current Biology.

[42]  Ulrich S Schwarz,et al.  Physical determinants of cell organization in soft media. , 2005, Medical engineering & physics.