Methods for prostate stabilization during transperineal LDR brachytherapy

In traditional prostate brachytherapy procedures for a low-dose-rate (LDR) radiation seed implant, stabilizing needles are first inserted to provide some rigidity and support to the prostate. Ideally this will provide better seed placement and an overall improved treatment. However, there is much speculation regarding the effectiveness of using regular brachytherapy needles as stabilizers. In this study, we explored the efficacy of two types of needle geometries (regular brachytherapy needle and hooked needle) and several clinically feasible configurations of the stabilization needles. To understand and assess the prostate movement during seed implantation, we collected in vivo data from patients during actual brachytherapy procedures. In vitro experimentation with tissue-equivalent phantoms allowed us to further understand the mechanics behind prostate stabilization. We observed superior stabilization with the hooked needles compared to the regular brachytherapy needles (more than 40% in bilateral parallel needle configuration). Prostate movement was also reduced significantly when regular brachytherapy needles were in an angulated configuration as compared to the parallel configuration (more than 60%). When the hooked needles were angulated for stabilization, further reduction in prostate displacement was observed. In general, for convenience of dosimetric planning and to avoid needle collision, all needles are desired to be in a parallel configuration. In this configuration, hooked needles provide improved stabilization of the prostate. On the other hand, both regular and hooked needles appear to be equally effective in reducing prostate movement when they are in angulated configurations, which will be useful in seed implantation using a robotic system. We have developed nonlinear spring-damper model for the prostate movement which can be used for adapting dosimetric planning during brachytherapy as well as for developing more realistic haptic devices and training simulators.

[1]  T W Griffin,et al.  Reduction of radioactive seed embolization to the lung following prostate brachytherapy. , 1998, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  Jian Z. Wang,et al.  Effect of edema, relative biological effectiveness, and dose heterogeneity on prostate brachytherapy. , 2006, Medical physics.

[3]  J. Pow-Sang,et al.  Improvement in dosimetry of ultrasound-guided prostate implants with the use of multiple stabilization needles. , 1996, Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.

[4]  Jean Pouliot,et al.  The robustness of dose distributions to displacement and migration of 125I permanent seed implants over a wide range of seed number, activity, and designs. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  M. Dattoli.  103Pd brachytherapy: rationale, design and evaluation , 2005 .

[6]  M Dattoli,et al.  A simple method to stabilize the prostate during transperineal prostate brachytherapy. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  Efficacy of Prostate Stabilizing Techniques during Brachytherapy Procedure , 2006, 2006 International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[8]  S Nag,et al.  Pulmonary embolization of permanently implanted radioactive palladium-103 seeds for carcinoma of the prostate. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  T. Podder,et al.  In vivo motion and force measurement of surgical needle intervention during prostate brachytherapy. , 2006, Medical physics.

[10]  R. Taschereau,et al.  Seed misplacement and stabilizing needles in transperineal permanent prostate implants. , 2000, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[11]  John Strang,et al.  A method to minimize puncturing force and organ deformation , 2006 .

[12]  Peter D. Grimm,et al.  Use of Transrectal Ultrasound in Transperineal 125Iodine Seeding for Prostate Cancer: Methodology , 1989 .

[13]  P. Roberson,et al.  Source placement error for permanent implant of the prostate. , 1997, Medical physics.

[14]  B. Davis,et al.  Prostate brachytherapy seed migration to the right ventricle found at autopsy following acute cardiac dysrhythmia. , 2000, The Journal of urology.

[15]  W. Butler,et al.  Isotope choice and the effect of edema on prostate brachytherapy dosimetry. , 2000, Medical physics.

[16]  R. Taschereau,et al.  Dosimetric impact of the variation of the prostate volume and shape between pretreatment planning and treatment procedure. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[17]  N. Yue,et al.  Edema associated with I-125 or Pd-103 prostate brachytherapy and its impact on post-implant dosimetry: an analysis based on serial CT acquisition. , 1998, International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics.

[18]  Julie Dawson,et al.  Dose effects of seeds placement deviations from pre-planned positions in ultrasound guided prostate implants , 1994 .

[19]  R Nath,et al.  The impact of edema on planning 125I and 103Pd prostate implants. , 1999, Medical physics.

[20]  W. Butler,et al.  Seed fixity in the prostate/periprostatic region following brachytherapy. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[21]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Lung tissue viscoelasticity: a mathematical framework and its molecular basis. , 1994, Journal of applied physiology.

[22]  S L Schoeppel,et al.  Treatment planning issues related to prostate movement in response to differential filling of the rectum and bladder. , 1991, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.