Direct current stimulation (tDCS) reveals parietal asymmetry in local/global and salience-based selection

Data from neuropsychology and neuroimaging studies indicate hemispheric asymmetries in processing object's global form versus local parts. However the attentional mechanisms subtending visual selection of different levels of information are poorly understood. The classical left hemisphere/local-right hemisphere/global dichotomy has been recently challenged by studies linking the asymmetry of activation in the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) with the relative salience of the stimulus rather than with the local/global level. The present study aimed to assess hemispheric asymmetry in local-global and salience-based selection in hierarchical stimuli by using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). To this end, tDCS has been applied to the PPC of both the hemispheres. Our data revealed that tDCS did affect the selection of the target on the basis of its relative salience in a manner that depended on the tDCS polarity applied to the two hemispheres. This result is in line with previous findings that the left PPC is critically involved in attention for low-salience stimuli in the presence of high-salience distractor information, while right PPC is involved in attending to more salient stimuli. Hemispheric asymmetries were also found in local/global selection. Overall the results suggest that neural activation in the PPC is related to both the salience and the level of stimulus representations mediating responses to hierarchical stimuli. The comparison of the results from Experiments 1 and 2 in local/global-based selection suggests that the effect of stimulation could be completely opposite depending on subtle differences in demands of attentional control (sustained attention vs task switching).

[1]  Lynn C. Robertson,et al.  The neurology of visual attention. , 1995 .

[2]  D. Navon.  Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[3]  V. Walsh,et al.  State-dependency in brain stimulation studies of perception and cognition , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[4]  G R Grice,et al.  Forest before trees? It depends where you look , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[5]  B. Bahrami,et al.  Distractibility in Daily Life Is Reflected in the Structure and Function of Human Parietal Cortex , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  P. Reuter-Lorenz,et al.  Global Versus Local Processing in the Absence of Low Spatial Frequencies , 1990, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[7]  C. D. Frith,et al.  Brain Activations during Visual Search: Contributions of Search Efficiency versus Feature Binding , 2003, NeuroImage.

[8]  L C Robertson,et al.  The processing of hierarchical stimuli: Effects of retinal locus, locational uncertainty, and stimulus identity , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Non-spatial extinction following lesions of the parietal lobe in humans , 1994, Nature.

[10]  D L Woods,et al.  Hierarchical processing and level-repetition effect as indexed by early brain potentials. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[11]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Studying the neurobiology of social interaction with transcranial direct current stimulation--the example of punishing unfairness. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[12]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans , 2001, Neurology.

[13]  C. Tesche,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation modulates shifts in global/local attention , 2009, Neuroreport.

[14]  K. Hoffmann,et al.  Direct Current Stimulation over V5 Enhances Visuomotor Coordination by Improving Motion Perception in Humans , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[15]  N. Birbaumer,et al.  Enhancement of Planning Ability by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  V. Walsh,et al.  Modulating Neuronal Activity Produces Specific and Long-Lasting Changes in Numerical Competence , 2010, Current Biology.

[17]  F. Di Russo,et al.  Electrophysiological analysis of cortical mechanisms of selective attention to high and low spatial frequencies , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[18]  Neil G. Muggleton,et al.  Modulating inhibitory control with direct current stimulation of the superior medial frontal cortex , 2011, NeuroImage.

[19]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[20]  J. Sergent.  The cerebral balance of power: confrontation or cooperation? , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  Shihui Han,et al.  The role of parietal cortex in global/local processing of hierarchical stimuli: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study , 2007, Neuroreport.

[22]  M. Banich,et al.  Global-local interference modulated by communication between the hemispheres. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[23]  R. Knight,et al.  Component mechanisms underlying the processing of hierarchically organized patterns: inferences from patients with unilateral cortical lesions. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[24]  L. Robertson,et al.  Effects of lesions of temporal-parietal junction on perceptual and attentional processing in humans , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[25]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Reflexive and Preparatory Selection and Suppression of Salient Information in the Right and Left Posterior Parietal Cortex , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[26]  Mi Young Lee,et al.  The effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on the cortical activation by motor task in the human brain: An fMRI study , 2009, Neuroscience Letters.

[27]  Antígona Martínez,et al.  Hemispneric asymmetries in global and local processing: evidence from fMRI , 1997, Neuroreport.

[28]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Modulation of cortical excitability by weak direct current stimulation--technical, safety and functional aspects. , 2003, Supplements to Clinical neurophysiology.

[29]  D. Delis,et al.  Hemispheric specialization of memory for visual hierarchical stimuli , 1986, Neuropsychologia.

[30]  J. Wilding,et al.  Hemispheric Differences in Matching Stroop-Type Letter Stimuli , 1982, Cortex.

[31]  Jeremy R. Reynolds,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Transient and Sustained Cognitive Control during Task Switching , 2003, Neuron.

[32]  Gregor Thut,et al.  Rhythmic TMS over Parietal Cortex Links Distinct Brain Frequencies to Global versus Local Visual Processing , 2011, Current Biology.

[33]  Alan Cowey,et al.  Temporal aspects of visual search studied by transcranial magnetic stimulation , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[34]  J. Hellige.  Cerebral hemisphere asymmetry: Method, theory, and application , 1983 .

[35]  Carmel Mevorach,et al.  Opposite biases in salience-based selection for the left and right posterior parietal cortex , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[36]  Carmel Mevorach,et al.  Ignoring the Elephant in the Room: A Neural Circuit to Downregulate Salience , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[37]  M. Koslowsky,et al.  tDCS polarity effects in motor and cognitive domains: a meta-analytical review , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[38]  R. S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Hemispheric specialization for global and local processing: the effect of stimulus category , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[39]  Pablo Celnik,et al.  Brain polarization enhances the formation and retention of motor memories. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[40]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation , 2000, The Journal of physiology.

[41]  Lynn C. Robertson,et al.  Interhemispheric relations in processing hierarchical patterns: Evidence from normal and commissurotomized subjects. , 1993 .

[42]  Maryanne Martin,et al.  Hemispheric specialization for local and global processing , 1979, Neuropsychologia.

[43]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Where in the brain does visual attention select the forest and the trees? , 1996, Nature.

[44]  M G Woldorff,et al.  Hemispheric asymmetries for different components of global/local attention occur in distinct temporo-parietal loci. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[45]  S. Sato,et al.  Safety and cognitive effect of frontal DC brain polarization in healthy individuals , 2005, Neurology.

[46]  S. Hevenor,et al.  The effect of variability of unattended information on global and local processing: evidence for lateralization at early stages of processing , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[47]  C D Frith,et al.  Neural mechanisms involved in the processing of global and local aspects of hierarchically organized visual stimuli. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[48]  V. Walsh,et al.  Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Facilitates Decision Making in a Probabilistic Guessing Task , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[49]  Scott O. Murray,et al.  Hemispheric Asymmetry in Global/Local Processing: Effects of Stimulus Position and Spatial Frequency , 2002, NeuroImage.

[50]  Ingrid R. Olson,et al.  A selective working memory impairment after transcranial direct current stimulation to the right parietal lobe , 2010, Neuroscience Letters.

[51]  J. Schatz,et al.  Level-repetition effects in hierarchical stimulus processing: timing and location of cortical activity. , 2003, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[52]  R Kimchi,et al.  Hemispheric processing of global form, local form, and texture. , 1991, Acta psychologica.

[53]  P. Matthews,et al.  Polarity-Sensitive Modulation of Cortical Neurotransmitters by Transcranial Stimulation , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[54]  D. Boles.  Global versus local processing: Is there a hemispheric dichotomy? , 1984, Neuropsychologia.

[55]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Generality of Parietal Involvement in Visual Attention , 1999, Neuron.

[56]  Lars A. Ross,et al.  Improved proper name recall by electrical stimulation of the anterior temporal lobes , 2010, Neuropsychologia.