Variation in Photosynthetic Characteristics and Leaf Area Contributes to Spathiphyllum Cultivar Differences in Biomass Production

Three genetically related Spathiphyllum cultivars, Claudia, Double Take, and Petite with similar initial sizes and biomass, were grown in a shaded greenhouse and fertilized with a constant supply of nitrogen at 200 g m−3 using an ebb-and-flow fertigation system. Seven months later, Claudia and Double Take had plant sizes and biomasses significantly greater than Petite. Stomatal conductances of Claudia and Double Take were 30 % greater, thus net photosynthetic rates (PN) were significantly higher than in Petite. In addition, the leaf areas (LA) of Claudia and Double Take were 60 % larger than of Petite. Since PN was expressed per leaf surface area, the greater the LA was, the more CO2 was fixed. Thus, the differences in plant size and biomass production of Claudia and Double Take compared to Petite are attributed to high PN and increased LA.

[1]  Loretta Gratani,et al.  Changes in morphological and physiological traits during leaf expansion of Arbutus unedo , 2002 .

[2]  Park S. Nobel,et al.  Physicochemical and Environmental Plant Physiology , 1991 .

[3]  O. T. Solbrig,et al.  STUDIES ON THE POPULATION BIOLOGY OF THE GENUS VIOLA. II. THE EFFECT OF PLANT SIZE ON FITNESS IN VIOLA SORORIA , 1981, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[4]  S. Kalisz,et al.  POPULATION-LEVEL VARIATION IN PHOTOSYNTHETIC METABOLISM AND GROWTH IN SEDUM WRIGHTII' , 1986 .

[5]  I. E. Woodrow,et al.  Enzymatic Regulation of Photosynthetic CO2, Fixation in C3 Plants , 1988 .

[6]  I. R. Cowan,et al.  Stomatal conductance correlates with photosynthetic capacity , 1979, Nature.

[7]  Jianjun Chen,et al.  Development of New Foliage Plant Cultivars , 2002 .

[8]  T. Sharkey,et al.  Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis , 1982 .

[9]  Longping Yuan,et al.  Comparison of Some Photosynthetic Characters Between Two Hybrid Rice Combinations Differing in Yield Potential , 2002, Photosynthetica.

[10]  P. Boyce,et al.  The Genera of Araceae , 1997 .

[11]  R. Percy,et al.  Stomatal conductance predicts yields in irrigated Pima cotton and bread wheat grown at high temperatures , 1998 .

[12]  R. J. Porra,et al.  Determination of accurate extinction coefficients and simultaneous equations for assaying chlorophylls a and b extracted with four different solvents: verification of the concentration of chlorophyll standards by atomic absorption spectroscopy , 1989 .

[13]  R. A. Larson,et al.  Introduction to floriculture. , 1992 .

[14]  N. Jordan,et al.  Contribution of photosynthetic rate to growth and reproduction in Amaranthus hybridus , 1998, Oecologia.

[15]  T. Dawson,et al.  Genetic variation in stomatal and biochemical limitations to photosynthesis in the annual plant, Polygonum arenastrum , 1997, Oecologia.

[16]  R. Percy,et al.  Inheritance of stomatal conductance in cotton (Gossypium barbadense) , 1996 .

[17]  B. Bond.  Age-related changes in photosynthesis of woody plants. , 2000, Trends in plant science.

[18]  D. Campbell,et al.  Seasonal changes in temperature and light drive acclimation of photosynthetic physiology and macromolecular content in Lobaria pulmonaria , 2001, Planta.

[19]  J. Janick,et al.  Trends in new crops and new uses , 2002 .

[20]  Dennis B. McConnell,et al.  COMMERCIAL FOLIAGE PLANTS: TWENTY YEARS OF CHANGE , 1989 .

[21]  R. Kumar,et al.  SEASONAL VARIATION IN PHOTOSYNTHESIS AND PRODUCTIVITY OF YOUNG TEA , 1999, Experimental Agriculture.

[22]  Charles A. Conover,et al.  22 – Foliage Plants , 1992 .

[23]  Z. Rengel,et al.  COMPILATION OF SIMPLE SPECTROPHOTOMETRIC TECHNIQUES FOR THE DETERMINATION OF ELEMENTS IN NUTRIENT SOLUTIONS , 2001 .