Effects of Turbulence and Devolatilization Models on Gasification Simulation

Numerical simulations of the oxygen-blown coal gasification process inside a generic entrained-flow gasifier are carried out using the commercial CFD solver FLUENT. The Navier-Stokes equations and seven species transport equations are solved with three heterogeneous global reactions and two homogeneous reactions. Finite rates are used for the heterogeneous solid-to-gas reactions. Both finite rate and eddy-breakup combustion models are calculated for each homogeneous gas-to-gas reaction, and the smaller of the two rates is used. Four different devolatilization models are employed and compared. The Kobayashi model produces slower devolatilization rate than the other models. The constant rate model produces the fastest devolatilization rate. The single rate model and the chemical percolation model produce moderate and consistent devolatilization rate. Slower devolatilization rate produces higher exit gas temperature, H2, and CO2, but lower CO and heating value, and hence, lower gasification efficiency. Combustion of volatiles is modeled with twostage global reactions with an intermediate stage via benzene. Turbulence models significantly affect the simulated results. Among five turbulence models tested, the standard k-e and the RSM models give consistent results. The time scale for employing stochastic time tracking of particles also affects simulated result. Caution has to be exerted to select the appropriate time constant value. Smaller particles have a higher surface/volume ratio and react faster than larger particles. However, large particles possessing higher inertia could impinge on the opposing jet and change the thermal-flow filed and the reaction rates.

[1]  B. Launder,et al.  The numerical computation of turbulent flows , 1990 .

[2]  Martin A. Mayers,et al.  The Rate of Oxidation of Graphite by Steam , 1934 .

[3]  Ting Wang,et al.  Effects of Fuel Injection Angles on Performance of A Two-Stage Coal Gasifier , 2006 .

[4]  P. G. W. Hawksley,et al.  Kinetics of Thermal Decomposition of Pulverized Coal Particles , 1970 .

[5]  Martin A. Mayers,et al.  The Rate of Reduction of Carbon Dioxide by Graphite , 1934 .

[6]  L. Douglas Smoot,et al.  Coal Combustion and Gasification , 1985 .

[7]  Adel F. Sarofim,et al.  CFD Modeling For Entrained Flow Gasifiers , 2002 .

[8]  B. Hjertager,et al.  On mathematical modeling of turbulent combustion with special emphasis on soot formation and combustion , 1977 .

[9]  Alan R. Kerstein,et al.  Chemical percolation model for devolatilization. 3. Direct use of carbon-13 NMR data to predict effects of coal type , 1992 .

[10]  Alan R. Kerstein,et al.  Chemical model of coal devolatilization using percolation lattice statistics , 1989 .

[11]  T. Fletcher,et al.  Chemical percolation model for devolatilization. 2. Temperature and heating rate effects on product yields , 1990 .

[12]  C. Singh,et al.  Simulation of High-Temperature Water-Gas Shift Reactors , 1977 .

[13]  Masayuki Horio,et al.  Numerical simulation of entrained flow coal gasifiers. Part II: effects of operating conditions on gasifier performance , 2000 .

[14]  Armin Silaen,et al.  Simulation of Coal Gasification Process Inside a Two-Stage Gasifier , 2004 .

[15]  D. Wilcox Turbulence modeling for CFD , 1993 .