Optimization of cutting parameters using Response Surface Method for minimizing energy consumption and maximizing cutting quality in turning of AISI 6061 T6 aluminum

Abstract Modern production is faced with the challenge of reducing the environmental impacts related to machining processes. Machine tools consume large amounts of energy and, as a consequence, environmental impacts are generated owing to this consumption. Many studies have been carried out in order to minimize cutting power, cutting energy or power consumed by the machine tool. Nevertheless, the response variables mentioned before do not take into account the energy required by all the components inside the machine tool during the cutting operation. This paper presents an experimental study related to the optimization of cutting parameters in roughing turning of AISI 6061 T6 aluminum. Energy consumption and surface roughness were minimized, while the material removal rate of the process was maximized. A set of experimental runs was established using a Central Composite Design, and the Response Surface Method was employed to obtain the regression model for the energy consumed during machining, specific energy, surface roughness and material removal rate. The adequacy of the model was proved by Analysis of Variance analysis. The relationship between cutting parameters and the response variables (energy consumption, surface roughness and material removal rate) was analyzed using contour plots. Moreover, the desirability method was used to define the values of the variables that achieved a minimum quantity of specific energy consumed and minimum surface roughness. Feed rate and depth of cut were the most significant factors for minimizing the total specific energy consumed, and for minimizing the surface roughness, feed rate was the most significant factor. Compared to the traditional objective optimization, the optimal turning parameters determined by the proposed optimization method reduced the energy consumption in 14.41%, and the surface roughness in 360.47%. Consequently, sustainability and quality of the machining process were achieved at the same time.

[1]  Garret E. O’Donnell,et al.  Industrial power and energy metering – a state-of-the-art review , 2013 .

[2]  Hari Singh,et al.  Optimizing power consumption for CNC turned parts using response surface methodology and Taguchi's technique—A comparative analysis , 2008 .

[3]  Paul Mativenga,et al.  Calculation of optimum cutting parameters based on minimum energy footprint , 2011 .

[4]  Julie Zimmerman,et al.  Design Through the 12 Principles of Green Engineering , 2003, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[5]  Rajesh Kumar Bhushan,et al.  Optimization of cutting parameters for minimizing power consumption and maximizing tool life during machining of Al alloy SiC particle composites , 2013 .

[6]  Wim Dewulf,et al.  Unit process impact assessment for discrete part manufacturing: A state of the art , 2010 .

[7]  Carmita Camposeco-Negrete Optimization of cutting parameters using robust design for minimizing energy consumption in turning of AISI 1018 steel with constant material removal rate , 2013 .

[8]  Christoph Herrmann,et al.  An Investigation into Fixed Energy Consumption of Machine Tools , 2011 .

[9]  Vimal Dhokia,et al.  Energy efficient process planning for CNC machining , 2012 .

[10]  Lin Li,et al.  Multi-objective optimization of milling parameters – the trade-offs between energy, production rate and cutting quality , 2013 .

[11]  H. Kaebernick Green manufacturing, fundamentals and applications , 2014 .

[12]  Peter Krajnik,et al.  Transitioning to sustainable production – Part I: application on machining technologies , 2010 .

[13]  Cristian Caizar,et al.  Application of Taguchi method to selection of optimal lubrication and cutting conditions in face milling of AlMg3 , 2011 .

[14]  Carmita Camposeco-Negrete,et al.  Optimization of cutting parameters for minimizing energy consumption in turning of AISI 6061 T6 using Taguchi methodology and ANOVA , 2013 .

[15]  Paul Mativenga,et al.  Modelling of direct energy requirements in mechanical machining processes , 2013 .

[16]  Moneer M. Helu,et al.  Impact of green machining strategies on achieved surface quality , 2012 .

[17]  J. Paulo Davim,et al.  Machinability investigations in hard turning of AISI D2 cold work tool steel with conventional and wiper ceramic inserts , 2009 .

[18]  J. Paulo Davim,et al.  Surface roughness measurement in turning carbon steel AISI 1045 using wiper inserts , 2011 .

[19]  Konstantinos Salonitis,et al.  Forty Sixth CIRP Conference on Manufacturing Systems 2013 Energy efficient manufacturing from machine tools to manufacturing systems , 2013 .

[20]  Gianni Campatelli,et al.  Optimization of process parameters using a Response Surface Method for minimizing power consumption in the milling of carbon steel , 2014 .

[21]  Anirban Bhattacharya,et al.  Estimating the effect of cutting parameters on surface finish and power consumption during high speed machining of AISI 1045 steel using Taguchi design and ANOVA , 2009, Prod. Eng..

[22]  I. Hanafi,et al.  Optimization of cutting conditions for sustainable machining of PEEK-CF30 using TiN tools , 2012 .

[23]  Egon Müller,et al.  Enabling Energy Management for Planning Energy-efficient Factories , 2013 .

[24]  Peter Krajnik,et al.  Transitioning to sustainable production – part II: evaluation of sustainable machining technologies , 2010 .

[25]  Falin Chen,et al.  Energy-saving potential of the industrial sector of Taiwan , 2013 .

[26]  İlhan Asiltürk,et al.  Multi response optimisation of CNC turning parameters via Taguchi method-based response surface analysis , 2012 .

[27]  J. S. Hunter,et al.  Multi-Factor Experimental Designs for Exploring Response Surfaces , 1957 .