Limiting treatment plan complexity by applying a novel commercial tool

Abstract Purpose A recently introduced commercial tool is tested to assess whether it is able to reduce the complexity of a treatment plan and improve deliverability without compromising overall quality. Methods Ten prostate and ten oropharynx plans of previously treated patients were reoptimized using the aperture shape controller (ASC) tool recently introduced in Eclipse TPS (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA). The performance of ASC was assessed in terms of the overall plan quality using a plan quality metric, the reduction in plan complexity through the analysis of 14 of the most common plan complexity metrics, and the change in plan deliverability through 3D dosimetric measurements. Similarly, plans optimized limiting the total number of delivered monitor units was assessed and compared. The two strategies were also combined to assess their potential combination. Results The plans optimized by exploiting the ASC generally show a reduced number of total Monitor Units, a more constant gantry rotation and a MLC modulation characterized by larger and less complicated shapes with leaves traveling shorter overall lengths. Conclusions This first experience suggests that the ASC is an effective tool to reduce the unnecessary complexity of a plan. This turns into an increased plan deliverability with no loss of plan quality.

[1]  F. Verhaegen,et al.  Should dose from small fields be limited for dose verification procedures?: uncertainty versus small field dose in VMAT treatments , 2018, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  Benedick A Fraass,et al.  Penalization of aperture complexity in inversely planned volumetric modulated arc therapy. , 2012, Medical physics.

[3]  P. Xia,et al.  Relationship of segment area and monitor unit efficiency in aperture‐based IMRT optimization , 2013, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[4]  Jin Ho Kim,et al.  Modulation indices for volumetric modulated arc therapy , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  James Wheeler,et al.  Variation in external beam treatment plan quality: An inter-institutional study of planners and planning systems. , 2012, Practical radiation oncology.

[6]  Frank Verhaegen,et al.  Influence of the jaw tracking technique on the dose calculation accuracy of small field VMAT plans , 2017, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[7]  Mariella Cozzolino,et al.  Monitor unit optimization in RapidArc plans for prostate cancer , 2013, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[8]  Assessment of the Monitor Unit Objective tool for VMAT in the Eclipse treatment planning system. , 2018, Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology.

[9]  Christina E Agnew,et al.  The role of complexity metrics in a multi-institutional dosimetry audit of VMAT. , 2016, The British journal of radiology.

[10]  Marta Paiusco,et al.  Reducing inter- and intra-planner variability in radiotherapy plan output with a commercial knowledge-based planning solution. , 2018, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[11]  Karl Otto,et al.  Volumetric modulated arc therapy: IMRT in a single gantry arc. , 2007, Medical physics.

[12]  Andrea L McNiven,et al.  A new metric for assessing IMRT modulation complexity and plan deliverability. , 2010, Medical physics.

[13]  Marta Paiusco,et al.  Efficiently train and validate a RapidPlan model through APQM scoring , 2018, Medical physics.

[14]  Lorenzo Livi,et al.  Impact of plan parameters on the dosimetric accuracy of volumetric modulated arc therapy. , 2013, Medical physics.

[15]  T Kairn,et al.  Examination of the properties of IMRT and VMAT beams and evaluation against pre-treatment quality assurance results , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  Marco Durante,et al.  Assessing the risk of second malignancies after modern radiotherapy , 2011, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[17]  M. Aznar,et al.  A closer look at RapidArc® radiosurgery plans using very small fields , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[18]  C. Clark,et al.  Volumetric modulated arc therapy: a review of current literature and clinical use in practice. , 2011, The British journal of radiology.

[19]  Rajat J Kudchadker,et al.  Quantification of beam complexity in intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment plans. , 2014, Medical physics.

[20]  Paul Sargos,et al.  Use of metrics to quantify IMRT and VMAT treatment plan complexity: A systematic review and perspectives. , 2019, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[21]  M. Esposito,et al.  Does deep inspiration breath hold reduce plan complexity? Multicentric experience of left breast cancer radiotherapy with volumetric modulated arc therapy. , 2019, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[22]  J. Mechalakos,et al.  IMRT commissioning: multiple institution planning and dosimetry comparisons, a report from AAPM Task Group 119. , 2009, Medical physics.

[23]  Jordi Saez,et al.  Comparison of complexity metrics for multi-institutional evaluations of treatment plans in radiotherapy , 2018, Physics and imaging in radiation oncology.

[24]  E. Hall,et al.  Radiation-induced second cancers: the impact of 3D-CRT and IMRT. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[25]  I. Das,et al.  Small fields: nonequilibrium radiation dosimetry. , 2007, Medical physics.

[26]  S Tomatis,et al.  Total monitor units influence on plan quality parameters in volumetric modulated arc therapy for breast case. , 2014, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[27]  E. Hall,et al.  Intensity-modulated radiation therapy, protons, and the risk of second cancers. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[28]  Performance of the eclipse monitor unit objective tool utilizing volumetric modulated arc therapy for rectal cancer. , 2019, Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology.

[29]  M. Moerland,et al.  A conformation number to quantify the degree of conformality in brachytherapy and external beam irradiation: application to the prostate. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[30]  Mauro Tambasco,et al.  Fractal analysis for assessing the level of modulation of IMRT fields. , 2011, Medical physics.

[31]  D. Gudipudi,et al.  Assessment of monitor unit limiting strategy using volumetric modulated arc therapy for cancer of hypopharynx. , 2017, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.