The Impact of Indiana’s System of Interim Assessments on Mathematics and Reading Achievement

Interim assessments are increasingly common in U.S. schools. We use high-quality data from a large-scale school-level cluster randomized experiment to examine the impact of two well-known commercial interim assessment programs on mathematics and reading achievement in Indiana. Results indicate that the treatment effects are positive but not consistently significant. The treatment effects are smaller in lower grades (i.e., kindergarten to second grade) and larger in upper grades (i.e., third to eighth grade). Significant treatment effects are detected in Grades 3 to 8, especially in third- and fourth-grade reading and in fifth- and sixth-grade mathematics.

[1]  A. Kluger,et al.  The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. , 1996 .

[2]  Sarah Guckenburg,et al.  Measuring how benchmark assessments affect student achievement , 2007 .

[3]  M. Perie,et al.  An Approach for Evaluating the Technical Quality of Interim Assessments , 2010 .

[4]  Paul N Goren,et al.  Data, Data, and More Data—What’s an Educator to Do? , 2012, American Journal of Education.

[5]  D. Sadler.  Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems , 1989 .

[6]  R. Stiggins.  Assessment Crisis: The Absence of Assessment for Learning , 2002 .

[7]  R. Berk,et al.  Place Randomized Trials , 2010 .

[8]  Matthew Riggan,et al.  From Testing to Teaching: The Use of Interim Assessments in Classroom Instruction , 2009 .

[9]  Karee E. Dunn,et al.  A Critical Review of Research on Formative Assessment: The Limited Scientific Evidence of the Impact of Formative Assessment in Education , 2009 .

[10]  LEARNER CHARACTERISTICS , 2011 .

[11]  Andrew C. Porter,et al.  Measuring the Content of Instruction: Uses in Research and Practice , 2002 .

[12]  Katrina E. Bulkley,et al.  Building With Benchmarks: The Role of the District in Philadelphia's Benchmark Assessment System , 2010 .

[13]  Mark W. Lipsey,et al.  Empirical Benchmarks for Interpreting Effect Sizes in Research , 2008 .

[14]  R. Coe,et al.  Evidence on the role and impact of performance feedback in schools. , 2002 .

[15]  M. White,et al.  academic trajectories of immigrant youths: Analysis within and across cohorts , 2003, Demography.

[16]  Spyros Konstantopoulos,et al.  Trends of School Effects on Student Achievement: Evidence from NLS:72, HSB:82, and NELS:92 , 2005, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[17]  Neal M. Kingston,et al.  Formative Assessment: A Meta-Analysis and a Call for Research , 2011 .

[18]  M. Perie,et al.  The role of interim assessments in a comprehensive assessment system: A policy brief. , 2007 .

[19]  Larry Ambrose,et al.  The power of feedback. , 2002, Healthcare executive.

[20]  Kristen Davidson,et al.  District Adoption and Implementation of Interim and Benchmark Assessments. CRESST Report 806. , 2011 .

[21]  David S. Cordray,et al.  The Impact of the Measures of Academic Progress (MAP) Program on Student Reading Achievement , 2012 .

[22]  Henry May,et al.  A Randomized Evaluation of Ohio's Personalized Assessment Reporting System (PARS) , 2007 .

[23]  R. Brennan,et al.  Test equating : methods and practices , 1995 .

[24]  W. Shadish,et al.  Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference , 2001 .

[25]  P. Black,et al.  Inside the Black Box: Raising Standards through Classroom Assessment , 2010 .

[26]  Katrina E. Bulkley,et al.  Learning to Learn From Data: Benchmarks and Instructional Communities , 2010 .

[27]  Matthew Riggan,et al.  Learning to Learn From Benchmark Assessment Data: How Teachers Analyze Results , 2010 .

[28]  Geoffrey D. Borman,et al.  A Multistate District-Level Cluster Randomized Trial of the Impact of Data-Driven Reform on Reading and Mathematics Achievement , 2011 .

[29]  W. Clune,et al.  Policy Effectiveness of Interim Assessments in Providence Public Schools. WCER Working Paper No. 2008-10. , 2008 .

[30]  Using Student Data to Improve Teaching and Learning: Findings from an Evaluation of the Formative Assessments of Students Thinking in Reading (FAST-R) Program in Boston Elementary Schools. , 2008 .