Restoration ecologists might not get what they want: Global change shifts trade-offs among ecosystem functions

Ecological restoration increasingly aims at improving ecosystem multifunctionality and making landscapes resilient to future threats, especially in biodiversity hotspots such as Mediterranean-type ecosystems. Successful realisation of such a strategy requires a fundamental mechanistic understanding of the link between ecosystem plant composition, plant traits and related ecosystem functions and services, as well as how climate change affects these relationships. An integrated approach of empirical research and simulation modelling with focus on plant traits can allow this understanding. Based on empirical data from a large-scale restoration project in a Mediterranean-type climate in Western Australia, we developed and validated the spatially explicit simulation model ModEST, which calculates coupled dynamics of nutrients, water and individual plants characterised by traits. We then simulated all possible combinations of eight plant species with different levels of diversity to assess the role of plant diversity and traits on multifunctionality, the provision of six ecosystem functions (covering three ecosystem services), as well as trade-offs and synergies among the functions under current and future climatic conditions. Our results show that multifunctionality cannot fully be achieved because of trade-offs among functions that are attributable to sets of traits that affect functions differently. Our measure of multifunctionality was increased by higher levels of planted species richness under current, but not future climatic conditions. In contrast, single functions were differently impacted by increased plant diversity. In addition, we found that trade-offs and synergies among functions shifted with climate change. Synthesis and application. Our results imply that restoration ecologists will face a clear challenge to achieve their targets with respect to multifunctionality not only under current conditions, but also in the long-term. However, once ModEST is parameterized and validated for a specific restoration site, managers can assess which target goals can be achieved given the set of available plant species and site-specific conditions. It can also highlight which species combinations can best achieve long-term improved multifunctionality due to their trait diversity.

[1]  M. Byrne,et al.  Plant functional traits differ in adaptability and are predicted to be differentially affected by climate change , 2019, Ecology and evolution.

[2]  M. Delgado‐Baquerizo,et al.  Multiple trade‐offs regulate the effects of woody plant removal on biodiversity and ecosystem functions in global rangelands , 2019, Global change biology.

[3]  Sebastian Fiedler,et al.  Integrating trait‐based empirical and modeling research to improve ecological restoration , 2018, Ecology and evolution.

[4]  G. Mace,et al.  Redefining ecosystem multifunctionality , 2018, Nature Ecology & Evolution.

[5]  Lars A. Brudvig,et al.  Plant functional traits and environmental conditions shape community assembly and ecosystem functioning during restoration , 2017 .

[6]  J. Funk,et al.  Revisiting the Holy Grail: using plant functional traits to understand ecological processes , 2017, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[7]  Nicolas Gross,et al.  Functional trait diversity maximizes ecosystem multifunctionality , 2017, Nature Ecology &Evolution.

[8]  B. Muys,et al.  Jack-of-all-trades effects drive biodiversity–ecosystem multifunctionality relationships in European forests , 2016, Nature Communications.

[9]  Richard J. Hobbs,et al.  Advances in restoration ecology: rising to the challenges of the coming decades , 2015 .

[10]  D. Laughlin,et al.  Applying trait-based models to achieve functional targets for theory-driven ecological restoration 1 Appendix S 1 . User ’ s guide and R code for applying trait-based models in ecological restoration Getting started , 2014 .

[11]  E. Schulze,et al.  More efficient aboveground nitrogen use in more diverse Central European forest canopies , 2014 .

[12]  Benjamin Smith,et al.  Implications of incorporating N cycling and N limitations on primary production in an individual-based dynamic vegetation model , 2013 .

[13]  Richard J. Hobbs,et al.  Primed for Change: Developing Ecological Restoration for the 21st Century , 2013 .

[14]  Takehiro Sasaki,et al.  Response diversity determines the resilience of ecosystems to environmental change , 2013, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[15]  B. Fu,et al.  Linking ecosystem processes and ecosystem services , 2013 .

[16]  David A. Coomes,et al.  Patterns and Drivers of Tree Mortality in Iberian Forests: Climatic Effects Are Modified by Competition , 2013, PloS one.

[17]  Richard J. Hobbs,et al.  The Ridgefield Multiple Ecosystem Services Experiment: Can restoration of former agricultural land achieve multiple outcomes? , 2012 .

[18]  F. Jeltsch,et al.  Low-dimensional trade-offs fail to explain richness and structure in species-rich plant communities , 2011, Theoretical Ecology.

[19]  Jeffrey R. Arnold,et al.  Integrating soil carbon cycling with that of nitrogen and phosphorus in the watershed model SWAT: Theory and model testing , 2011 .

[20]  Florian Jeltsch,et al.  Reversed effects of grazing on plant diversity: the role of below- ground competition and size symmetry , 2009 .

[21]  S. Lovell,et al.  Creating multifunctional landscapes: how can the field of ecology inform the design of the landscape? , 2009 .

[22]  Erwin Zehe,et al.  Simulating plant water availability in dry lands under climate change: A generic model of two soil layers , 2009 .

[23]  Katharine N Suding,et al.  Testing the Holy Grail framework: using functional traits to predict ecosystem change. , 2008, The New phytologist.

[24]  P. Ciais,et al.  Modeled interactive effects of precipitation, temperature, and [CO2] on ecosystem carbon and water dynamics in different climatic zones , 2008 .

[25]  J. Cornelissen,et al.  Plant functional traits and soil carbon sequestration in contrasting biomes. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[26]  Eric Garnier,et al.  Assessing the effects of land-use change on plant traits, communities and ecosystem functioning in grasslands: a standardized methodology and lessons from an application to 11 European sites. , 2007, Annals of botany.

[27]  I. C. Prentice,et al.  Evaluation of ecosystem dynamics, plant geography and terrestrial carbon cycling in the LPJ dynamic global vegetation model , 2003 .

[28]  S. Lavorel,et al.  Predicting changes in community composition and ecosystem functioning from plant traits: revisiting the Holy Grail , 2002 .

[29]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. , 2000, Science.

[30]  R. Cowling,et al.  Plant diversity in mediterranean-climate regions. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[31]  J. Kollmann,et al.  Linking plant traits to multiple soil functions in semi-arid ecosystems , 2020 .

[32]  C. Müller,et al.  LPJmL4 – a dynamic global vegetation model with managed land: Part I – Model description , 2017 .

[33]  E. Schulze,et al.  Biodiversity–multifunctionality relationships depend on identity and number of measured functions , 2017, Nature Ecology & Evolution.

[34]  N. Anten,et al.  A plant economics spectrum in Mediterranean forests along environmental gradients: is there coordination among leaf, stem and root traits? , 2016 .

[35]  R. Salguero‐Gómez,et al.  Quero impacts of global environmental change on drylands It is getting hotter in here : determining and projecting the , 2012 .

[36]  A. Troumbis,et al.  Simulating vegetation shifts in north- eastern Mediterranean mountain forests under climatic change scenarios , 2009 .