Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins: Force Field Evaluation and Comparison with Experiment.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Roger Fletcher,et al. A Rapidly Convergent Descent Method for Minimization , 1963, Comput. J..
[2] P. Y. Chou,et al. Conformational parameters for amino acids in helical, beta-sheet, and random coil regions calculated from proteins. , 1974, Biochemistry.
[3] H. Berendsen,et al. Interaction Models for Water in Relation to Protein Hydration , 1981 .
[4] W. Kabsch,et al. Dictionary of protein secondary structure: Pattern recognition of hydrogen‐bonded and geometrical features , 1983, Biopolymers.
[5] W. L. Jorgensen,et al. Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water , 1983 .
[6] H. Berendsen,et al. Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath , 1984 .
[7] Jorge Nocedal,et al. On the limited memory BFGS method for large scale optimization , 1989, Math. Program..
[8] P. A. Raj,et al. Salivary histatin 5: dependence of sequence, chain length, and helical conformation for candidacidal activity. , 1990, The Journal of biological chemistry.
[9] Dmitri I. Svergun,et al. Determination of the regularization parameter in indirect-transform methods using perceptual criteria , 1992 .
[10] T. Darden,et al. Particle mesh Ewald: An N⋅log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems , 1993 .
[11] V. Muñoz,et al. Intrinsic secondary structure propensities of the amino acids, using statistical ϕ–ψ matrices: Comparison with experimental scales , 1994 .
[12] D. Svergun,et al. CRYSOL : a program to evaluate X-ray solution scattering of biological macromolecules from atomic coordinates , 1995 .
[13] D. van der Spoel,et al. GROMACS: A message-passing parallel molecular dynamics implementation , 1995 .
[14] Wilfred F. van Gunsteren,et al. A generalized reaction field method for molecular dynamics simulations , 1995 .
[15] Berk Hess,et al. LINCS: A linear constraint solver for molecular simulations , 1997 .
[16] P. A. Raj,et al. Structure of human salivary histatin 5 in aqueous and nonaqueous solutions. , 1998, Biopolymers.
[17] G. Lajoie,et al. NMR studies of the antimicrobial salivary peptides histatin 3 and histatin 5 in aqueous and nonaqueous solutions. , 1998, Biochemistry and cell biology = Biochimie et biologie cellulaire.
[18] S. Balasubramanian,et al. Role of alpha-helical conformation of histatin-5 in candidacidal activity examined by proline variants. , 2000, Biochimica et biophysica acta.
[19] P. Kollman,et al. How well does a restrained electrostatic potential (RESP) model perform in calculating conformational energies of organic and biological molecules? , 2000 .
[20] T. Abee,et al. Characterization of Histatin 5 with Respect to Amphipathicity, Hydrophobicity, and Effects on Cell and Mitochondrial Membrane Integrity Excludes a Candidacidal Mechanism of Pore Formation* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.
[21] Berk Hess,et al. GROMACS 3.0: a package for molecular simulation and trajectory analysis , 2001 .
[22] C. Soares,et al. Constant-pH molecular dynamics using stochastic titration , 2002 .
[23] Vladimir N Uversky,et al. A Protein-Chameleon: Conformational Plasticity of α-Synuclein, a Disordered Protein Involved in Neurodegenerative Disorders , 2003, Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics.
[24] Chris Oostenbrink,et al. A biomolecular force field based on the free enthalpy of hydration and solvation: The GROMOS force‐field parameter sets 53A5 and 53A6 , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..
[25] Greg L. Hura,et al. Development of an improved four-site water model for biomolecular simulations: TIP4P-Ew. , 2004, The Journal of chemical physics.
[26] Yuko Okamoto,et al. Secondary-structure preferences of force fields for proteins evaluated by generalized-ensemble simulations , 2004 .
[27] Gerrit Groenhof,et al. GROMACS: Fast, flexible, and free , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..
[28] C. Vega,et al. A general purpose model for the condensed phases of water: TIP4P/2005. , 2005, The Journal of chemical physics.
[29] Miguel Machuqueiro,et al. Constant-pH molecular dynamics with ionic strength effects: protonation-conformation coupling in decalysine. , 2006, The journal of physical chemistry. B.
[30] V. Hornak,et al. Comparison of multiple Amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters , 2006, Proteins.
[31] M. Parrinello,et al. Canonical sampling through velocity rescaling. , 2007, The Journal of chemical physics.
[32] J. Forman-Kay,et al. Atomic-level characterization of disordered protein ensembles. , 2007, Current opinion in structural biology.
[33] Alessandra Villa,et al. How sensitive are nanosecond molecular dynamics simulations of proteins to changes in the force field? , 2007, The journal of physical chemistry. B.
[34] Carsten Kutzner,et al. GROMACS 4: Algorithms for Highly Efficient, Load-Balanced, and Scalable Molecular Simulation. , 2008, Journal of chemical theory and computation.
[35] A. Baptista,et al. Conformational analysis in a multidimensional energy landscape: study of an arginylglutamate repeat. , 2009, The journal of physical chemistry. B.
[36] Frank Küster,et al. Single-molecule spectroscopy of the temperature-induced collapse of unfolded proteins , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[37] Bert L de Groot,et al. Secondary structure propensities in peptide folding simulations: a systematic comparison of molecular mechanics interaction schemes. , 2009, Biophysical journal.
[38] G. Hummer,et al. Optimized molecular dynamics force fields applied to the helix-coil transition of polypeptides. , 2009, The journal of physical chemistry. B.
[39] D. Eliezer,et al. Biophysical characterization of intrinsically disordered proteins. , 2009, Current opinion in structural biology.
[40] R. Best,et al. Protein simulations with an optimized water model: cooperative helix formation and temperature-induced unfolded state collapse. , 2010, The journal of physical chemistry. B.
[41] Dominique Durand,et al. Proline-rich salivary proteins have extended conformations. , 2010, Biophysical journal.
[42] R. Dror,et al. Improved side-chain torsion potentials for the Amber ff99SB protein force field , 2010, Proteins.
[43] Andreas P. Eichenberger,et al. Definition and testing of the GROMOS force-field versions 54A7 and 54B7 , 2011, European Biophysics Journal.
[44] William F. Christensen,et al. Methods of Multivariate Analysis: Rencher/Methods , 2012 .
[45] Jing Huang,et al. CHARMM36 all‐atom additive protein force field: Validation based on comparison to NMR data , 2013, J. Comput. Chem..
[46] R. Best,et al. Balanced Protein–Water Interactions Improve Properties of Disordered Proteins and Non-Specific Protein Association , 2014, Journal of chemical theory and computation.
[47] Stefano Piana,et al. Assessing the accuracy of physical models used in protein-folding simulations: quantitative evidence from long molecular dynamics simulations. , 2014, Current opinion in structural biology.
[48] Ernst-Walter Knapp,et al. Protein Secondary Structure Classification Revisited: Processing DSSP Information with PSSC , 2014, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[49] Mikael Lund,et al. Role of histidine for charge regulation of unstructured peptides at interfaces and in bulk , 2014, Proteins.
[50] A. Barducci,et al. Accuracy of current all-atom force-fields in modeling protein disordered states. , 2015, Journal of chemical theory and computation.
[51] Paul Robustelli,et al. Water dispersion interactions strongly influence simulated structural properties of disordered protein states. , 2015, The journal of physical chemistry. B.