Approaches and considerations for the assessment of immunotoxicity for environmental chemicals: a workshop summary.

As experience is gained with toxicology testing and as new assays and technologies are developed, it is critical for stakeholders to discuss opportunities to advance our overall testing strategies. To facilitate these discussions, a workshop on practices for assessing immunotoxicity for environmental chemicals was held with the goal of sharing perspectives on immunotoxicity testing strategies and experiences, developmental immunotoxicity (DIT), and integrated and alternative approaches to immunotoxicity testing. Experiences across the chemical and pharmaceutical industries suggested that standard toxicity studies, combined with triggered-based testing approaches, represent an effective and efficient approach to evaluate immunotoxic potential. Additionally, discussions on study design, critical windows, and new guideline approaches and experiences identified important factors to consider before initiating DIT evaluations including assay choice and timing and the impact of existing adult data. Participants agreed that integrating endpoints into standard repeat-dose studies should be considered for fulfilling any immunotoxicity testing requirements, while also maximizing information and reducing animal use. Participants also acknowledged that in vitro evaluation of immunosuppression is complex and may require the use of multiple assays that are still being developed. These workshop discussions should contribute to developing an effective but more resource and animal efficient approach for evaluating chemical immunotoxicity.

[1]  L. Hammond,et al.  An F1-Extended One-Generation Reproductive Toxicity Study in Crl:CD(SD) Rats With 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid , 2013, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[2]  R. Dietert,et al.  Developmental exposure to lead causes persistent immunotoxicity in Fischer 344 rats. , 1998, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[3]  Silvia Casati,et al.  Chemical Reactivity Measurement and the Predictive Identification of Skin Sensitisers , 2008 .

[4]  H. Vohr,et al.  Functional assays are mandatory for a correct prediction of immunotoxic properties of compounds in vitro. , 2009, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[5]  C. Gennings,et al.  Risk assessment in immunotoxicology. I. Sensitivity and predictability of immune tests. , 1992, Fundamental and applied toxicology : official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[6]  G. Ladics,et al.  Possible incorporation of an immunotoxicological functional assay for assessing humoral immunity for hazard identification purposes in rats on standard toxicology study. , 1995, Toxicology.

[7]  Rodney,et al.  Current Status of Developmental Immunotoxicity: Early-Life Patterns and Testing , 2011 .

[8]  Valérie Zuang,et al.  Alternative (non-animal) methods for cosmetics testing: current status and future prospects—2010 , 2011, Archives of Toxicology.

[9]  J. Fenters,et al.  Development of a testing battery to assess chemical-induced immunotoxicity: National Toxicology Program's guidelines for immunotoxicity evaluation in mice. , 1988, Fundamental and applied toxicology : official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[10]  Richard W. Lewis,et al.  The mouse carcinogenicity study is no longer a scientifically justifiable core data requirement for the safety assessment of pesticides , 2010, Critical reviews in toxicology.

[11]  R. Smialowicz,et al.  The effects of perinatal/juvenile methoxychlor exposure on adult rat nervous, immune, and reproductive system function. , 1997, Fundamental and applied toxicology : official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[12]  R A Etzel,et al.  Workshop to identify critical windows of exposure for children's health: immune and respiratory systems work group summary. , 2000, Environmental health perspectives.

[13]  B. van Ravenzwaay,et al.  Feasibility of the extended one-generation reproductive toxicity study (OECD 443). , 2012, Reproductive toxicology.

[14]  K. Reisinger,et al.  Identifying and characterizing chemical skin sensitizers without animal testing: Colipa's research and method development program. , 2010, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[15]  Martin Paparella,et al.  On the impact of second generation mating and offspring in multi-generation reproductive toxicity studies on classification and labelling of substances in Europe. , 2011, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[16]  J. G. Vos,et al.  Immune suppression as related to toxicology. , 1977, CRC critical reviews in toxicology.

[17]  R J Smialowicz,et al.  The effects of perinatal/juvenile heptachlor exposure on adult immune and reproductive system function in rats. , 2001, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[18]  M. Holsapple Developmental immunotoxicity testing: a review. , 2003, Toxicology.

[19]  C. Portier,et al.  Qualitative and quantitative experimental models to aid in risk assessment for immunotoxicology. , 1992, Toxicology letters.

[20]  J. Fenters,et al.  Development of a testing battery to assess chemical-induced immunotoxicity: National toxicology program's guidelines for immunotoxicity evaluation in mice , 1988 .

[21]  Myron A. Mehlman,et al.  Advances in modern environmental toxicology , 1980 .

[22]  M. Höglund,et al.  The FMCA-GM assays, high throughput non-clonogenic alternatives to CFU-GM in preclinical hematotoxicity testing. , 2010, Toxicology letters.

[23]  Grace Yvonne Patlewicz,et al.  A step change towards risk assessment in the 21st century. , 2013, Frontiers in bioscience.

[24]  G Patlewicz,et al.  An evaluation of selected global (Q)SARs/expert systems for the prediction of skin sensitisation potential , 2007, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.

[25]  G. Ladics,et al.  Further evaluation of the incorporation of an immunotoxicological functional assay for assessing humoral immunity for hazard identification purposes in rats in a standard toxicology study. , 1998, Toxicology.

[26]  P. Parsons,et al.  Exposure to lead during critical windows of embryonic development: differential immunotoxic outcome based on stage of exposure and gender. , 2001, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[27]  R. Smialowicz,et al.  Persistent suppression of delayed-type hypersensitivity in adult F344 rats after perinatal exposure to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. , 1999, Toxicology.

[28]  S. Aiba,et al.  An in vitro test to screen skin sensitizers using a stable THP-1-derived IL-8 reporter cell line, THP-G8. , 2011, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[29]  Casati Silvia,et al.  Skin Sensitisation and Epidermal Disposition: The Relevance of Epidermal Disposition for Sensitisation Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment , 2007 .

[30]  Report of validation study of assessment of direct immunotoxicity in the rat. The ICICIS Group Investigators. International Collaborative Immunotoxicity Study. , 1998, Toxicology.

[31]  Andreas Luch,et al.  T-cell recognition of chemicals, protein allergens and drugs: towards the development of in vitro assays , 2010, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.

[32]  H. Vohr,et al.  Specific antibody responses of primary cells from different cell sources are able to predict immunotoxicity in vitro. , 2011, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[33]  R. Smialowicz,et al.  Effects of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) on humoral immunity and lymphocyte subpopulations: differences between mice and rats. , 1994, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[34]  M. Holsapple Developmental immunotoxicology and risk assessment: a workshop summary , 2002, Human & experimental toxicology.

[35]  I. Kimber,et al.  A murine local lymph node assay for the identification of contact allergens , 2004, Archives of Toxicology.

[36]  J. Bailar,et al.  Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century: A Vision and a Strategy , 2010, Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews.

[37]  A. Olshan,et al.  Workshop to identify critical windows of exposure for children's health: cancer work group summary. , 2000, Environmental health perspectives.

[38]  E. Corsini,et al.  Present and future of in vitro immunotoxicology in drug development , 2010, Journal of immunotoxicology.

[39]  S. Makris,et al.  What’s So Special about the Developing Immune System? , 2008, International journal of toxicology.

[40]  David H. Chen,et al.  The Comparative Immunotoxicity of Five Selected Compounds Following Developmental or Adult Exposure , 2006, Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews.

[41]  Silvia Casati,et al.  Chemical reactivity measurement and the predicitve identification of skin sensitisers. The report and recommendations of ECVAM Workshop 64. , 2008, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.

[42]  D. Parent-Massin,et al.  Prevalidation of a model for predicting acute neutropenia by colony forming unit granulocyte/macrophage (CFU-GM) assay. , 2001, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[43]  R. Luebke Immunotoxicant Screening and Prioritization in the Twenty-first Century , 2012, Toxicologic pathology.

[44]  P Pollock,et al.  Risk assessment in immunotoxicology. II. Relationships between immune and host resistance tests. , 1993, Fundamental and applied toxicology : official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[45]  M. Luster,et al.  Consensus workshop on methods to evaluate developmental immunotoxicity. , 2002, Environmental health perspectives.

[46]  D. Paustenbach,et al.  Symposium summary: children's health risk--what's so special about the developing immune system? , 2004, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[47]  Silvia Casati,et al.  Skin Sensitisation and Epidermal Disposition: The Relevance of Epidermal Disposition for Sensitisation Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment , 2007, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.

[48]  G. Ladics,et al.  CHARACTERIZATION OF AN APPROACH TO DEVELOPMENTAL IMMUNOTOXICOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN THE RAT USING SRBC AS THE ANTIGEN , 2000 .

[49]  Nancy G Doerrer,et al.  A tiered approach to life stages testing for agricultural chemical safety assessment. , 2007, Critical reviews in toxicology.

[50]  Susan L Makris,et al.  Developmental toxicology evaluations--issues with including neurotoxicology and immunotoxicology assessments in reproductive toxicology studies. , 2005, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[51]  G. Ladics Primary Immune Response to Sheep Red Blood Cells (SRBC) as the Conventional T-Cell Dependent Antibody Response (TDAR) Test , 2007, Journal of immunotoxicology.

[52]  K. Küttler,et al.  Validation of a modified 28-day rat study to evidence effects of test compounds on the immune system. , 1995, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[53]  P. Bugelski,et al.  Critical Review of Preclinical Approaches to Evaluate the Potential of Immunosuppressive Drugs to Influence Human Neoplasia , 2010, International journal of toxicology.

[54]  E Rorije,et al.  Combined retrospective analysis of 498 rat multi-generation reproductive toxicity studies: on the impact of parameters related to F1 mating and F2 offspring. , 2011, Reproductive toxicology.

[55]  G. Ladics,et al.  Retrospective evaluation of the impact of functional immunotoxicity testing on pesticide hazard identification and risk assessment , 2014, Critical reviews in toxicology.

[56]  R. Pieters,et al.  The Use of In Vitro Systems for Evaluating Immunotoxicity: The Report and Recommendations of an ECVAM Workshop , 2005, Journal of immunotoxicology.

[57]  D. Keil,et al.  Current Status of Developmental Immunotoxicity , 2012, Toxicologic pathology.

[58]  S. Gibbs,et al.  Progress on the development of human in vitro dendritic cell based assays for assessment of the sensitizing potential of a compound. , 2009, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[59]  Valérie Zuang,et al.  Dendritic Cells as a Tool for the Predictive Identification of Skin Sensitisation Hazard , 2005, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.

[60]  E. Corsini,et al.  Immunotoxicology: Opportunities for Non-animal Test Development , 2009, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.

[61]  V. Dellarco,et al.  A retrospective analysis of toxicity studies in dogs and impact on the chronic reference dose for conventional pesticide chemicals , 2010, Critical reviews in toxicology.

[62]  Ronald N. Hines,et al.  A Tiered Approach to Life Stages Testing for Agricultural Chemical Safety Assessment , 2006 .

[63]  S. Makris,et al.  A proposed testing framework for developmental immunotoxicology (DIT). , 2004, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[64]  H. van Loveren,et al.  Development of the ICH Guidelines for Immunotoxicology Evaluation of Pharmaceuticals Using a Survey of Industry Practices , 2005, Journal of immunotoxicology.

[65]  R. Dietert Immunotoxicity Testing , 2010, Methods in Molecular Biology™.

[66]  E. Gore Immune function tests for hazard identification: a paradigm shift in drug development. , 2006, Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology.

[67]  J. Vos Immunotoxicity assessment: screening and function studies. , 1980, Archives of toxicology. Supplement. = Archiv fur Toxikologie. Supplement.

[68]  R. House An overview of in vitro/ex vivo assays for preclinical evaluation of immunomo dulation , 2000, Human & experimental toxicology.