The stability of local properties of fuzzy relations under ordinal equivalence

Abstract We consider a notion of equivalence relation between fuzzy relations and its properties. The relation is called ordinal equivalence since it partitions the family of fuzzy relations into equivalence classes by means of the order defined on elements of each relation. We compare fuzzy relations by their membership values and as a consequence we propose two types of local properties of fuzzy relations. New properties of fuzzy relations are more compatible with the ordinal equivalence relation, namely they are stable in the equivalence classes. Moreover, we study dependencies between these new properties of fuzzy relations. Finally, notes on applications of the presented local properties and the ordinal equivalence relation are provided.

[1]  L. Kohout,et al.  Special properties, closures and interiors of crisp and fuzzy relations , 1988 .

[2]  S. Ovchinnikov Means on ordered sets , 1996 .

[3]  Bernard De Baets,et al.  On the existence and construction of T-transitive closures , 2003, Inf. Sci..

[4]  P. Fishburn Intransitive indifference with unequal indifference intervals , 1970 .

[5]  Urszula Bentkowska,et al.  Preservation of fuzzy relation properties based on fuzzy conjunctions and disjunctions during aggregation process , 2016, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[6]  Ladislav J. Kohout,et al.  Semantics of implication operators and fuzzy relational products , 1980 .

[7]  Michel Grabisch,et al.  On equivalence classes of fuzzy connectives-the case of fuzzy integrals , 1995, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst..

[8]  Barbara Pekala,et al.  An Equivalence Relation and Admissible Linear Orders in Decision Making , 2017, EUSFLAT/IWIFSGN.

[9]  R. Luce Semiorders and a Theory of Utility Discrimination , 1956 .

[10]  Marc Roubens,et al.  Fuzzy Preference Modelling and Multicriteria Decision Support , 1994, Theory and Decision Library.

[11]  Radko Mesiar,et al.  Aggregation Operators and Commuting , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[12]  Prabir Bhattacharya,et al.  Fuzzy subgroups: Some characterizations , 1987 .

[13]  Zhou-Tian Fan,et al.  Convergence of the power sequence of a nearly monotone increasing fuzzy matrix , 1997, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[14]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Similarity relations and fuzzy orderings , 1971, Inf. Sci..

[15]  P. Fishburn Interval representations for interval orders and semiorders , 1973 .

[16]  Urszula Bentkowska B-properties of fuzzy relations in aggregation process — the “converse problem” , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE).

[17]  Urszula Dudziak,et al.  Weak and graded properties of fuzzy relations in the context of aggregation process , 2010, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[18]  R. Mesiar,et al.  Aggregation operators: properties, classes and construction methods , 2002 .

[19]  Bernard De Baets,et al.  T -partitions , 1998 .

[20]  M. K. Chakraborty,et al.  On fuzzy equivalence I , 1983 .

[21]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Sets , 1996, Inf. Control..

[22]  Venkat Murali,et al.  On an equivalence of fuzzy subgroups I , 2001, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[23]  P. Farquhar,et al.  Preference intensity measurement , 1989 .

[24]  M. Thomason Convergence of powers of a fuzzy matrix , 1977 .

[25]  Bernard De Baets,et al.  Clonal sets of a binary relation , 2018, Int. J. Gen. Syst..

[26]  Barbara Pekala Uncertainty Data in Interval-Valued Fuzzy Set Theory - Properties, Algorithms and Applications , 2019, Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing.

[27]  Lazim Abdullah,et al.  Aggregation Methods in Group Decision Making: A Decade Survey , 2017, Informatica.

[28]  Bernard De Baets,et al.  Algorithms for computing the min-transitive closure and associated partition tree of a symmetric fuzzy relation , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[29]  János C. Fodor,et al.  Fuzzy Preference Relations Based on Differences , 2010, Preferences and Decisions.

[30]  Humberto Bustince,et al.  Contrast of a fuzzy relation , 2010, Inf. Sci..

[31]  Humberto Bustince,et al.  A Practical Guide to Averaging Functions , 2015, Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing.

[32]  Ivan Popchev,et al.  Properties of the aggregation operators related with fuzzy relations , 2003, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[33]  Bernard De Baets,et al.  A compendium of fuzzy weak orders: Representations and constructions , 2007, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[34]  Equivalent fuzzy sets , 1981 .

[35]  Bernard De Baets,et al.  A clone-based representation of the fuzzy tolerance or equivalence relations a strict order relation is compatible with , 2016, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[36]  Barbara Pekala,et al.  Properties of Interval-Valued Fuzzy Relations, Atanassov's Operators and Decomposable Operations , 2010, IPMU.

[37]  Venkat Murali,et al.  Fuzzy points of equivalent fuzzy subsets , 2004, Inf. Sci..

[38]  A. Kaufman,et al.  Introduction to the Theory of Fuzzy Subsets. , 1977 .

[39]  Raymond T Yeh,et al.  FUZZY RELATIONS, FUZZY GRAPHS, AND THEIR APPLICATIONS TO CLUSTERING ANALYSIS , 1975 .

[40]  Ulrich Bodenhofer,et al.  A Similarity-Based Generalization of Fuzzy Orderings Preserving the Classical Axioms , 2000, Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst..