Enzymatic hydrolysis of wood with alkaline treatment

Pulverized samples of wood, cedar and eucalyptus were treated with 5 N NaOH solutions at 25–150 °C. Hemicellulose and lignin content in the samples decreased with increasing treatment temperatures, while the recovery of glucose was maintained at nearly 90 %. X-ray diffraction analysis showed that the content of the original cellulose I structure in the samples decreased with increasing temperature, and most of the cellulose in the sample treated at 150 °C was converted to cellulose II by mercerization. Enzymatic hydrolysis of the alkaline-treated samples was carried out at 37 °C using solutions comprising a mixture of cellulase and β-glucosidase. The samples treated at higher temperatures showed better enzymatic degradability. Treatment with an alkaline solution of lower concentration (1 N NaOH) at 150 °C was also used. Despite significant quantities of hemicellulose and lignin being removed, mercerization was not induced. The enzymatic degradability was much lower than that of the sample treated with a 5 N NaOH solution at 150 °C. Thus, treatment with concentrated alkaline solution at high temperature led to not only the removal of hemicellulose and lignin, but also to modification of the cellulose structure, which resulted in high efficiency of enzymatic saccharification of the wood samples.

[1]  M. Wada,et al.  Activation of crystalline cellulose to cellulose IIII results in efficient hydrolysis by cellobiohydrolase , 2007, The FEBS journal.

[2]  M. Hayn,et al.  Structural changes of LODP cellulose in the original and mercerized state during enzymatic hydrolysis , 1992 .

[3]  Leroy G. Borchardt,et al.  A gas chromatographic method for carbohydrates as alditol-acetates , 1970 .

[4]  T. K. Ghose Measurement of cellulase activities , 1987 .

[5]  Stephen Y. Lin,et al.  Methods in Lignin Chemistry , 1992, Springer Series in Wood Science.

[6]  A. Stipanovic,et al.  Effect of digestion by pure cellulases on crystallinity and average chain length for bacterial and microcrystalline celluloses , 2007 .

[7]  K. Tokuyasu,et al.  Enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose hydrates , 2012, Cellulose.

[8]  Paul Langan,et al.  Crystal structure and hydrogen-bonding system in cellulose Ibeta from synchrotron X-ray and neutron fiber diffraction. , 2002, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[9]  C. W. Dence,et al.  The Determination of Lignin , 1992 .

[10]  Masakazu Ike,et al.  Enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose I is greatly accelerated via its conversion to the cellulose II hydrate form , 2010 .

[11]  M. Delwiche,et al.  Methods for Pretreatment of Lignocellulosic Biomass for Efficient Hydrolysis and Biofuel Production , 2009 .

[12]  T. Okano,et al.  Mercerization of cellulose. I. X-ray diffraction evidence for intermediate structures , 1984 .

[13]  B. Browning Determination of lignin , 1967 .

[14]  V. Kokol,et al.  Enzymatic hydrolysis of different allomorphic forms of microcrystalline cellulose , 2011 .

[15]  R. Sparling,et al.  Biomass pretreatment: fundamentals toward application. , 2011, Biotechnology advances.

[16]  T. Okano,et al.  Mercerization of cellulose. II. Alkali–cellulose intermediates and a possible mercerization mechanism , 1985 .