Digital plagiarism: An experimental study of the effect of instructional goals and copy-and-paste affordance

Abstract This paper presents an empirical study of digital plagiarism. Under two experimental conditions, undergraduate writers were guided by different achievement goals to write an essay with or without the copy-and-paste function on a website. The study focused on two possible influences on digital plagiarism, a) instructional goals for writing, and b) the affordances of digital learning environments specifically the availability of a copy-paste function. A 2 × 2 factorial design was used to analyze the effects of these contextual variables on digital plagiarism. Results indicated that overall 79.5% of the writers engaged in digital plagiarism. There was a significant interaction in which instructional performance goals lead to more plagiarism when copy-paste is available. Findings highlight individual-environment interactions, including a writer's adopted goals for writing as set by writing prompt instructions (learning goals vs. performance goals) and the affordances of the writing environment including the ease of copy-paste or precautions taken to protect text (such as using jpegs of text). Rather than being principally directed by student's beliefs prior to, or when they begin a writing task, the on-the-fly interactions they have during the writing task may best explain their tendency toward plagiarism.

[1]  M. Maehr,et al.  Achievement Goals and Student Well-Being. , 1999, Contemporary educational psychology.

[2]  Patrick M. Scanlon,et al.  Internet Plagiarism among College Students. , 2002 .

[3]  Andrew J. Elliot,et al.  Self-Regulation of Achievement Goal Pursuit , 2012 .

[4]  Michael Tang,et al.  University anti-plagiarism efforts versus commercial anti-plagiarism software and services and do online students cheat more? , 2007 .

[5]  Matthew T. McCrudden,et al.  Exploring Differences in Students' Copy-and-Paste Decision Making and Processing: A Mixed-Methods Study , 2005 .

[6]  Hei-Chia Wang,et al.  Design and usability testing of a learning and plagiarism avoidance tutorial system for paraphrasing and citing in English: A case study , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[7]  Brent G. Wilson,et al.  Affordances and Constraints of the Internet for Learning and Instruction. , 1996 .

[8]  K. E. Barron,et al.  Examining the Psychometric Properties of the Achievement Goal Questionnaire in a General Academic Context , 2004 .

[9]  Heinz Dreher,et al.  Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology Automatic Conceptual Analysis for Plagiarism Detection , 2022 .

[10]  Eric M. Anderman,et al.  Changes in Achievement Goal Orientations, Perceived Academic Competence, and Grades across the Transition to Middle-Level Schools , 1997, Contemporary educational psychology.

[11]  Barry Harper,et al.  Applying distributed cognition theory to the redesign of the 'Copy and Paste' function in order to promote appropriate learning outcomes , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[12]  Kathleen Holt,et al.  A pattern analysis of students' achievement goals. , 1993 .

[13]  Hewijin Christine Jiau,et al.  Beyond plagiarism: An active learning method to analyze causes behind code-similarity , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[14]  A. Bandura Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[15]  G. Diekhoff,et al.  College cheating: Ten years later , 1996 .

[16]  N. Selwyn A Safe Haven for Misbehaving? , 2008 .

[17]  K. E. Barron,et al.  Revision of achievement goal theory: Necessary and illuminating. , 2002 .

[18]  B. Whitley,et al.  FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH CHEATING AMONG COLLEGE STUDENTS: A Review , 1998 .

[19]  Lidija Bilic-Zulle,et al.  Is There an Effective Approach to Deterring Students from Plagiarizing? , 2008, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[20]  Hunter Gehlbach,et al.  Under pressure and under-engaged: Motivational profiles and academic cheating in high school , 2007 .

[21]  Eric M. Anderman,et al.  Motivational Perspectives on Student Cheating: Toward an Integrated Model of Academic Dishonesty , 2006 .

[22]  Christopher A. Was,et al.  Orientación de meta de logro académico: un nuevo planteamiento. , 2017 .

[23]  Murali Ramaswamy It is not just the work - It is also the words , 2007 .

[24]  Wendy Sutherland-Smith,et al.  The tangled web: Internet plagiarism and international students’ academic writing , 2005 .

[25]  Michael F. Young,et al.  Locating an Ecological Psychology Methodology for Situated Action , 2001 .

[26]  P. Pintrich,et al.  An Achievement Goal Theory Perspective on Issues in Motivation Terminology, Theory, and Research. , 2000, Contemporary educational psychology.

[27]  Elizabeth Cauffman,et al.  It's Wrong, But Everybody Does It: Academic Dishonesty among High School and College Students , 2002 .

[28]  Brockenbrough S. Allen,et al.  MEDIA AS LIVED ENVIRONMENTS: THE ECOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY , 1996 .

[29]  Sandra Turner,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of Digital Cheating and Plagiarism Among Middle School Students , 2007 .

[30]  Joan L. Duda,et al.  A Comparative Analysis of Contemporary Achievement Goal Orientation Measures , 2001 .

[31]  Dominic Keuskamp,et al.  Plagiarism prevention or detection? The contribution of text-matching software to education about academic integrity , 2007 .

[32]  J. Greeno THE SITUATIVITY OF KNOWING, LEARNING, AND RESEARCH , 1998 .

[33]  C. Was Academic Achievement Goal Orientation: Taking Another Look. , 2006 .

[34]  E. Gibson,et al.  An Ecological Approach to Perceptual Learning and Development , 2000 .

[35]  J. Michael Spector,et al.  Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, 3rd Edition , 2012 .

[36]  Michael F. Young,et al.  The unit of analysis for situated assessment , 1997 .

[37]  Aaron U. Bolin Self-Control, Perceived Opportunity, and Attitudes as Predictors of Academic Dishonesty , 2004, The Journal of psychology.

[38]  Ranald Macdonald,et al.  Plagiarism—a complex issue requiring a holistic institutional approach , 2006 .

[39]  Michael F. Young,et al.  Does Moral Judgment Go Offline When Students Are Online? A Comparative Analysis of Undergraduates' Beliefs and Behaviors Related to Conventional and Digital Cheating , 2007 .

[40]  Sergey Butakov,et al.  The toolbox for local and global plagiarism detection , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[41]  Carole A. Ames Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. , 1992 .

[42]  J. Greeno Gibson's affordances. , 1994, Psychological review.

[43]  Kenneth A. Kiewra,et al.  Cheating Perceptions and Prevalence across Academic Settings. , 2010 .

[44]  Jean Underwood,et al.  Academic offences and e-learning: individual propensities in cheating , 2003, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[45]  Judith A. Effken,et al.  An ecological approach to the on-line assessment of problem-solving paths: Principles and applications , 1997 .

[46]  Arie W. Kruglanski,et al.  Aspects of goal networks: Implications for self-regulation. , 2000 .

[47]  K. Ellery,et al.  Undergraduate plagiarism: a pedagogical perspective , 2008 .

[48]  J. Gibson The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[49]  D W Repperger,et al.  The intentional spring: a strategy for modeling systems that learn to perform intentional acts. , 1992, Journal of motor behavior.

[50]  C. Thompson,et al.  Unintended Lessons: Plagiarism and the University , 2006, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[51]  Erkki Sutinen,et al.  Using natural language parsers in plagiarism detection , 2007, SLaTE.

[52]  John Trushell,et al.  ICT facilitated access to information and undergraduates' cheating behaviours , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[53]  M. Bong Academic Motivation in Self-Efficacy, Task Value, Achievement Goal Orientations, and Attributional Beliefs , 2004 .

[54]  Steve Kennewell,et al.  Using affordances and constraints to evaluate the use of information and communications technology in teaching and learning , 2001 .

[55]  Gregory Schraw,et al.  Interest and academic cheating. , 2007 .

[56]  James Warn,et al.  Plagiarism software: no magic bullet! , 2006 .

[57]  Eric M. Anderman,et al.  Changes in self-reported academic cheating across the transition from middle school to high school , 2004 .

[58]  Eric M. Anderman,et al.  Motivation and Cheating During Early Adolescence , 1998 .

[59]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Motivation in Education: Theory, Research, and Applications , 1995 .

[60]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Analogical problem solving , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[61]  C. Dweck,et al.  A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality , 1988 .

[62]  Naomie Salim,et al.  Understanding Plagiarism Linguistic Patterns, Textual Features, and Detection Methods , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews).

[63]  A. Bandura Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. , 1999, Annual review of psychology.

[64]  T. Murdock,et al.  Predictors of Cheating among Early Adolescents: Academic and Social Motivations. , 2001, Contemporary educational psychology.

[65]  Elaine Ferneley,et al.  Embodied agents in E-learning environments: An exploratory case study , 2006 .

[66]  A. Jordan,et al.  College Student Cheating: The Role of Motivation, Perceived Norms, Attitudes, and Knowledge of Institutional Policy , 2001 .

[67]  David W. Brooks,et al.  The Unified Learning Model: How Motivational, Cognitive, and Neurobiological Sciences Inform Best Teaching Practices , 2009 .