Personas, Participatory Design and Product Development: An Infrastructure for Engagement

The design of commercial products that are intended to serve millions of people has been a challenge for collaborative approaches. The creation and use of fictional users, concrete representations commonly referred to as 'personas', is a relatively new interaction design technique. It is not without problems and can be used inappropriately, but based on experience and analysis it has extraordinary potential. Not only can it be a powerful tool for true participation in design, it also forces designers to consider social and political aspects of design that otherwise often go unexamined.

[1]  Mary Beth Rosson,et al.  Scenario-based design , 2002 .

[2]  Roy Rada,et al.  Interacting WITH Computers , 1989, Interact. Comput..

[3]  Pelle Ehn,et al.  Work-oriented design of computer artifacts , 1989 .

[4]  Michael J. Muller.  Layered participatory analysis: new developments in the CARD technique , 2001, CHI.

[5]  J. Astington,et al.  Theory of mind development and social understanding. , 1995 .

[6]  Bill Verplank,et al.  Actors, hairdos & videotape—informance design , 1994, CHI Conference Companion.

[7]  Paul Dourish,et al.  On "Technomethodology": Foundational Relationships Between Ethnomethodology and System Design , 1998, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[8]  Morten Kyng.  Scandanavian design: users in product development , 1994, CHI Conference Companion.

[9]  Morten Kyng,et al.  Cardboard Computers: Mocking-it-up or Hands-on the Future , 1992 .

[10]  John M. Carroll,et al.  Five reasons for scenario-based design , 2000, Interact. Comput..

[11]  Michael J. Muller.  Retrospective on a year of participatory design using the PICTIVE technique , 1992, CHI.

[12]  Finn Kensing,et al.  Generating visions: future workshops and metaphorical design , 1992 .

[13]  Joep W. Frens,et al.  Interaction relabelling and extreme characters: methods for exploring aesthetic interactions , 2000, DIS '00.

[14]  Alan Cooper,et al.  The Inmates are Running the Asylum , 1999, Software-Ergonomie.

[15]  Janice Redish,et al.  User and task analysis for interface design , 1998 .

[16]  Terry Trickett,et al.  Design at Work , 1992 .

[17]  Mark Billinghurst,et al.  Crossing the Chasm , 2001 .

[18]  Karen Holtzblatt,et al.  Contextual design , 1997, INTR.

[19]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Obstacles to participatory design in large product development organizations , 1990 .

[20]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Organizational obstacles to interface design and development: two participant-observer studies , 1994, TCHI.

[21]  Pelle Ehn,et al.  Scandinavian Design: On Participation and Skill , 1992, Usability - Turning Technologies into Tools.

[22]  Art Weinstein,et al.  Defining Your Market: Winning Strategies for High-Tech, Industrial, and Service Firms , 1998 .

[23]  Morten Kyng,et al.  Designing for a dollar a day , 1988, CSCW '88.

[24]  Susanne Bødker,et al.  Scenarios in user-centred design-setting the stage for reflection and action , 1999, Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers.

[25]  Lucy A. Suchman,et al.  Reflections on a Work-Oriented Design Project , 1996, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[26]  Douglas Schuler,et al.  Participatory Design: Principles and Practices , 1993 .

[27]  William R. Dolan,et al.  Participatory Design Shapes Future of Telephone Handsets , 1995 .

[28]  Lene Nielsen,et al.  From user to character: an investigation into user-descriptions in scenarios , 2002, DIS '02.