Refined numerical modelling for the structural assessment of steel-concrete composite beam-to-column joints under seismic loads

Abstract This paper proposes a refined Finite-Element (FE) numerical approach to predict both global and local behaviour of steel-concrete composite welded joints subjected to seismic loads. The reference FE model is implemented in ABAQUS and first extensively validated to the full-scale experimental results of a welded steel-concrete composite specimen tested in a past research project, where the beam-to-column sub-assemblages were designed according to the prescriptions of Eurocode 4 and Eurocode 8. As shown, due to the FE modelling assumptions, a rather close agreement was generally found between the FE predictions and the corresponding test measurements, both in terms of global and local phenomena. Therefore, it is first expected that such numerical approach could be implemented as an alternative to costly and time consuming full-scale experimental tests, allowing an extensive parametric investigation of composite joints and possible design optimizations. An implicit advantage of the implemented FE model, in fact, is that according to a refined analysis of the experimental and numerical results for the welded joint object of investigation, the efficiency of the Eurocode 8 design prescriptions for steel-concrete composite joint details can be critically discussed and reviewed. In the specific case, a possible improvement of the design recommendations for the slab reinforcement around the column is proposed.

[1]  Carlo Andrea Castiglioni,et al.  Behavior of exterior partial-strength composite beam-to-column connections: Experimental study and numerical simulations , 2009 .

[2]  Feng Zhou,et al.  Full-Scale Test of Composite Frame under Large Cyclic Loading , 2007 .

[3]  Paulo J. S. Cruz,et al.  Experimental behaviour of end-plate beam-to-column composite joints under monotonical loading , 2001 .

[4]  Robert Tremblay,et al.  Seismic performance of a 3D full‐scale high‐ductile steel–concrete composite moment‐resisting frame—Part II: Test results and analytical validation , 2008 .

[5]  Z. Bažant.  Concrete fracture models: testing and practice , 2002 .

[6]  Robert Tremblay,et al.  Seismic performance of a 3D full‐scale high‐ductility steel–concrete composite moment‐resisting structure—Part I: Design and testing procedure , 2008 .

[7]  Khalid M. Mosalam,et al.  Finite-element analysis of a composite frame under large lateral cyclic loading , 2007 .

[8]  Robert Tremblay,et al.  Behaviour and modelling of partial‐strength beam‐to‐column composite joints for seismic applications , 2007 .

[9]  Le-Wu Lu,et al.  CYCLIC TESTS OF FULL-SCALE COMPOSITE JOINT SUBASSEMBLAGES , 1989 .

[10]  Luís Simões da Silva,et al.  Cyclic Behaviour of End-Plate Beam-To-Column Composite Joints , 2001 .

[11]  Delphine Saidane,et al.  Implementation and Validation of a Gurson Damage Model Modified for Shear Loading: Effect of Void Growth Rate and Mesh Size on the Predicted Behavior , 2012 .

[12]  Adrian Ciutina,et al.  Seismic Response of Composite Structures Including Actual Behaviour of Beam-To-Column Joints , 2006 .

[13]  Maria Rosaria Pecce,et al.  The experimental behavior and simple modeling of joints in composite MRFs , 2015 .

[14]  Jianqiao Ye,et al.  Effect of shear connector spacing and layout on the shear connector capacity in composite beams , 2011 .

[15]  Roberto T. Leon.  Analysis and design problems for PR composite frames subjected to seismic loads , 1998 .

[16]  Kapil Khandelwal,et al.  Gurson model parameters for ductile fracture simulation in ASTM A992 steels , 2014 .

[17]  Wei Jiang,et al.  Analysis of Metallic Ductile Fracture by extended Gurson models , 2013 .

[18]  N. E. Shanmugam,et al.  Composite joints subject to reversal of loading—Part 2: analytical assessments , 2004 .

[19]  Roberto T. Leon,et al.  BIDIRECTIONAL TESTS ON PARTIALLY RESTRAINED, COMPOSITE BEAM-TO-COLUMN CONNECTIONS , 2004 .

[20]  N. E. Shanmugam,et al.  Testing of steel-concrete composite connections and appraisal of results , 2000 .

[21]  Amr S. Elnashai,et al.  Seismic design and performance of composite frames , 2004 .

[22]  Oreste S. Bursi,et al.  Behaviour of composite substructures with full and partial shear connection under quasi-static cyclic and pseudo-dynamic displacements , 2000 .

[23]  Oreste S. Bursi,et al.  Design, testing and analysis of high ductile partial-strength steel-concrete composite beam-to-column joints , 2005 .

[24]  R. P. Johnson,et al.  General rules and rules for buildings , 2004 .

[25]  Christian Thaulow,et al.  A complete Gurson model approach for ductile fracture , 2000 .

[26]  G. Cricrì.  Consistent use of the Gurson-Tvergaard damage model for the R-curve calculation , 2009 .

[27]  N. E. Shanmugam,et al.  Composite joints subject to reversal of loading—Part 1: experimental study , 2004 .