Influence of Vagus Nerve Stimulation parameters on chronotropism and inotropism in heart failure

Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) has been shown to be useful in heart failure patients, including antiarrhythmic effects, improvement of cardiac function and reduction of the mortality. However, the optimal configuration of VNS can be a difficult task, since there are several adjustable parameters, such as current amplitude (mA), pulse width (ms), burst frequency (Hz), number of pulses and, in the case of cardiac-triggered VNS, the delay (ms) between the R-wave and the beginning of the stimulation. The objective of this paper is to analyse the effect of these parameters, and their interaction, on the chronotropic and inotropic responses to vagal stimulation. 306 VNS sequences were tested on 12 sheep with induced heart failure. Autonomic markers of the chronotropic (changes in RR interval) and inotropic (changes in dP/dtmax) effects were extracted from the observed data. In order to analyse the influence of stimulation parameters on these markers, a sensitivity analysis method was applied. Results illustrate the strong interaction between the delay and the others parameters. The number of pulses, the current and the frequency seem to be particularly influent on chronotropism and inotropism although the effect of the frequency is highly non-linear or it depends on other parameters.

[1]  Zoran B. Popović,et al.  Chronic Vagus Nerve Stimulation Improves Autonomic Control and Attenuates Systemic Inflammation and Heart Failure Progression in a Canine High-Rate Pacing Model , 2009, Circulation. Heart failure.

[2]  J M Levett,et al.  Bradycardia induced by intravascular versus direct stimulation of the vagus nerve. , 1998, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[3]  Peter J. Schwartz,et al.  Vagus nerve stimulation: from pre-clinical to clinical application: challenges and future directions , 2011, Heart Failure Reviews.

[4]  Laura Calvillo,et al.  Vagal Stimulation, Through its Nicotinic Action, Limits Infarct Size and the Inflammatory Response to Myocardial Ischemia and Reperfusion , 2011, Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology.

[5]  James Winter,et al.  Mechanisms underlying the autonomic modulation of ventricular fibrillation initiation—tentative prophylactic properties of vagus nerve stimulation on malignant arrhythmias in heart failure , 2012, Heart Failure Reviews.

[6]  Thomas Desaive,et al.  Arterial dP/dtmax accurately reflects left ventricular contractility during shock when adequate vascular filling is achieved , 2012, BMC Cardiovascular Disorders.

[7]  Warren M. Grill,et al.  Excitation properties of the right cervical vagus nerve in adult dogs , 2011, Experimental Neurology.

[8]  Max D. Morris,et al.  Factorial sampling plans for preliminary computational experiments , 1991 .

[9]  G. Ferrari,et al.  Vagal Stimulation in Heart Failure , 2014 .

[10]  Masaru Sugimachi,et al.  Vagal Nerve Stimulation Markedly Improves Long-Term Survival After Chronic Heart Failure in Rats , 2003, Circulation.

[11]  Werner Irnich The Terms “Chronaxie” and “Rheobase” are 100 Years Old , 2010, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[12]  Roberto Maestri,et al.  Prognostic implications of baroreflex sensitivity in heart failure patients in the beta-blocking era. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[13]  S. Floras,et al.  Sympathetic Nervous System Activation in Human Heart Failure , 2022 .

[14]  H. Klein,et al.  Vagus nerve stimulation: A new approach to reduce heart failure. , 2010, Cardiology journal.

[15]  H. L. Stone,et al.  Autonomic mechanisms in ventricular fibrillation induced by myocardial ischemia during exercise in dogs with healed myocardial infarction. An experimental preparation for sudden cardiac death. , 1984, Circulation.

[16]  Bing Wang,et al.  Optimizing the Parameters of Vagus Nerve Stimulation by Uniform Design in Rats with Acute Myocardial Infarction , 2012, PloS one.