Executive control in the Simon task: A dual-task examination of response priming and its suppression

Executive control processes are supposed to regulate behaviour and to resolve conflicts in information processing. Recently, Stürmer and colleagues (Stürmer et al., 2002; Stürmer & Leuthold, 2003) reported electrophysiological findings in a Simon task that indicated control over a location-based processing route that mediates response priming. Importantly, when a response conflict occurred on a given trial, a suppression of response priming on the immediately following trial was demonstrated. The present study examines boundary conditions of such control in the Simon paradigm by comparing single-task with dual-task performance. In four experiments a second task, alternating trial-by-trial with the Simon task, was systematically manipulated in its control demands. Whereas reaction time (RT) analysis of single-task conditions revealed the absence of location-based response priming in the Simon task, such priming reappeared when the second task required an overt response. In contrast, working memory load as such did not touch the Simon effect. Therefore, not the response conflict itself but capacity-limited response monitoring processes seem to be critical for executive control in the Simon task and the suppression of response priming.

[1]  E. Awh,et al.  Conflict adaptation effects in the absence of executive control , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[2]  C. Frith,et al.  Routes to action in reaction time tasks , 1986, Psychological research.

[3]  S. Monsell Control of mental processes , 2021, Unsolved Mysteries of the Mind.

[4]  E. Stoffels On stage robustness and response selection routes: Further evidence , 1996 .

[5]  A. Schnitzler,et al.  Magnetic stimulation of the dorsal premotor cortex modulates the Simon effect. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[6]  M. Botvinick,et al.  Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance. , 1998, Science.

[7]  E. Donchin,et al.  Optimizing the use of information: strategic control of activation of responses. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[8]  E. Lauber,et al.  Conditional and unconditional automaticity: a dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Switching attention and resolving interference: fMRI measures of executive functions , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[10]  V. Bruce Unsolved mysteries of the mind : tutorial essays in cognition , 1998 .

[11]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of anterior cingulate function in a go/no-go task: Effects of response conflict and trial type frequency , 2003, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[12]  B. Kopp,et al.  N200 in the flanker task as a neurobehavioral tool for investigating executive control. , 1996, Psychophysiology.

[13]  A. Osman,et al.  Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility--a model and taxonomy. , 1990, Psychological review.

[14]  B. Hommel,et al.  A feature-integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task , 2004, Psychological research.

[15]  Jin Fan,et al.  Cognitive and Brain Consequences of Conflict , 2003, NeuroImage.

[16]  U. Ansorge,et al.  Exploring trial-by-trial modulations of the Simon effect , 2005, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[17]  J. Grafman,et al.  Dissociating the roles of the rostral anterior cingulate and the lateral prefrontal cortices in performing two tasks simultaneously or successively. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[18]  M. Posner,et al.  Executive attention: Conflict, target detection, and cognitive control. , 1998 .

[19]  John C Gore,et al.  An event-related functional MRI study comparing interference effects in the Simon and Stroop tasks. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[20]  H. Leuthold,et al.  Response priming in the Simon paradigm , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[21]  E. Soetens,et al.  Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  H G Vaughan,et al.  The scalp topography of potentials in auditory and visual Go/NoGo tasks. , 1977, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[23]  Wim Notebaert,et al.  Sequential analysis of a Simon task – evidence for an attention-shift account , 2001, Psychological research.

[24]  J. R. Simon The Effects of an Irrelevant Directional CUE on Human Information Processing , 1990 .

[25]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  A computational model of anterior cingulate function in speeded response tasks: Effects of frequency, sequence, and conflict , 2002, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[26]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Response Times: Their Role in Inferring Elementary Mental Organization , 1986 .

[27]  H. Bokura,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates for response inhibition in a Go/NoGo task , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[28]  H. Pashler Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[29]  Torsten Schubert,et al.  Multiple bottlenecks in information processing? An electrophysiological examination , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[30]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Pre- and poststimulus activation of response channels: a psychophysiological analysis. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[31]  M. Posner,et al.  Localization of a Neural System for Error Detection and Compensation , 1994 .

[32]  R. C. Oldfield THE ASSESSMENT AND ANALYSIS OF HANDEDNESS , 1971 .

[33]  E. Stein,et al.  A parametric manipulation of central executive functioning. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[34]  E. Stoffels,et al.  Uncertainty and processing routes in the selection of a response: an S-R compatibility study. , 1996, Acta psychologica.

[35]  B. Hommel Event Files: Evidence for Automatic Integration of Stimulus-Response Episodes , 1998 .

[36]  B. Kopp,et al.  N2, P3 and the lateralized readiness potential in a nogo task involving selective response priming. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[37]  E. Stein,et al.  Right hemispheric dominance of inhibitory control: an event-related functional MRI study. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[39]  H. Leuthold,et al.  Response priming in the Simon paradigm. A transcranial magnetic stimulation study. , 2000, Experimental brain research.

[40]  R. D. Gordon,et al.  Executive control of visual attention in dual-task situations. , 2001, Psychological review.

[41]  Kazunori Sato,et al.  The Human Prefrontal and Parietal Association Cortices Are Involved in NO-GO Performances: An Event-Related fMRI Study , 2002, NeuroImage.

[42]  M. Botvinick,et al.  Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. , 2001, Psychological review.

[43]  Hartmut Leuthold,et al.  Control over response priming in visuomotor processing: a lateralized event-related potential study , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[44]  E. Lauber,et al.  Conditional and unconditional automaticity: a dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[45]  R. Knight,et al.  Prefrontal–cingulate interactions in action monitoring , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[46]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Conflict monitoring versus selection-for-action in anterior cingulate cortex , 1999, Nature.