Fuel bulk density and fuel moisture content effects on fire rate of spread: a comparison between FIRETEC model predictions and experimental results in shrub fuels

Fuel bulk density and fuel moisture content effects on fire rate of spread were assessed in shrub fuels, comparing experimental data observed in outdoor wind tunnel burns and predictions from the physically-based model FIRETEC. Statistical models for the combined effects of bulk density and fuel moisture content were fitted to both the experimental and the simulated rate of spread values using non-linear regression techniques. Results confirmed a significant decreasing effect of bulk density on rate of spread in a power law in both laboratory burns and simulations. However, experimental data showed a lesser effect than simulations, suggesting a difference in the effective drag. Fuel moisture content effect was highly consistent, showing a similar exponential relationship with rate of spread in laboratory and in simulations. FIRETEC simulations showed similar orders of magnitude with predictions of two field-based empirical models, finding a significant correlation between rate of spread values. The study confirms the efficacy of the combined approach through experimental data and simulations to study fire behaviour.

[1]  David R. Weise,et al.  Fire spread in chaparral—'go or no-go?' , 2005 .

[2]  Jesse S. Lozano,et al.  An Investigation of Crown Fuel Bulk Density Effects on the Dynamics of Crown Fire Initiation in Shrublands , 2008 .

[3]  J. Finnigan.  Turbulence in plant canopies , 2000 .

[4]  R. Shaw,et al.  Turbulent Statistics of Neutrally Stratified Flow Within and Above a Sparse Forest from Large-Eddy Simulation and Field Observations , 1998 .

[5]  N. Cheney,et al.  The Influence of Fuel, Weather and Fire Shape Variables on Fire-Spread in Grasslands , 1993 .

[6]  E. Marino,et al.  Assessing fire propagation empirical models in shrub fuel complexes using wind tunnel data. , 2008 .

[7]  A. Sullivan,et al.  Wildland surface fire spread modelling, 1990–2007. 2: Empirical and quasi-empirical models , 2007, 0706.4128.

[8]  Developing shrub fire behaviour models in an oceanic climate: Burning in the British Uplands , 2006 .

[9]  Paulo M. Fernandes,et al.  Fire spread prediction in shrub fuels in Portugal , 2001 .

[10]  Enrique Jiménez,et al.  Exploring three-dimensional coupled fire–atmosphere interactions downwind of wind-driven surface fires and their influence on backfires using the HIGRAD-FIRETEC model , 2011 .

[11]  Jb Marsden-Smedley,et al.  Fire Behaviour Modelling in Tasmanian Buttongrass Moorlands .II. Fire Behaviour , 1995 .

[12]  M. F. wolff,et al.  Wind-Aided Firespread Across Arrays of Discrete Fuel Elements. II. Experiment , 1990 .

[13]  W. Catchpole,et al.  Modelling Moisture Damping for Fire Spread in a Mixture of Live and Dead Fuels , 1991 .

[14]  H. Anderson,et al.  Heat transfer and fire spread , 1969 .

[15]  C. Loureiro,et al.  Models for the sustained ignition and behaviour of low-to-moderately intense fires in maritime pine stands. , 2002 .

[16]  David R. Weise,et al.  Modeling of marginal burning state of fire spread in live chaparral shrub fuel bed , 2005 .

[17]  P. Thomas.  Rates of Spread of Some Wind-driven Fires , 1971 .

[18]  F. H. Harlow,et al.  FIRETEC: A transport description of wildfire behavior , 1997 .

[19]  D. C. Le Maitre,et al.  Fire Behaviour in South African Fynbos (Macchia) Vegetation and Predictions from Rothermel's Fire Model , 1985 .

[20]  George F. Carrier,et al.  Wind-aided firespread across arrays of discrete fuel elements. I, Theory , 1991 .

[21]  Michael R. Raupach,et al.  Simplified expressions for vegetation roughness length and zero-plane displacement as functions of canopy height and area index , 1994 .

[22]  C. Legg,et al.  Developing a live fuel moisture model for moorland fire danger rating , 2008 .

[23]  Philip E. Dennison,et al.  Critical live fuel moisture in chaparral ecosystems: a threshold for fire activity and its relationship to antecedent precipitation , 2009 .

[24]  François Pimont,et al.  Validation of FIRETEC wind-flows over a canopy and a fuel-break , 2009 .

[25]  E. Marino,et al.  Fire hazard after prescribed burning in a gorse shrubland: implications for fuel management. , 2011, Journal of environmental management.

[26]  Erich J. Plate,et al.  AERODYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF ATMOSPHERIC BOUNDARY LAYERS. , 1971 .

[27]  Philip Cunningham,et al.  Numerical simulations of grass fires using a coupled atmosphere–fire model: Basic fire behavior and dependence on wind speed , 2005 .

[28]  Francisco Rego,et al.  Empirical modelling of surface fire behaviour in maritime pine stands , 2009 .

[29]  Gary A. Morris,et al.  Rate of Spread of Free-Burning Fires in Woody Fuels in a Wind Tunnel , 1998 .