Lumped parameter model for prediction of initial breakthrough profiles for the chromatographic capture of antibodies from a complex feedstock.

Abstract A simple mathematical model to predict initial breakthrough profiles from preparative chromatographic separations of biological macromolecules has been developed. A lumped parameter approach was applied, employing Langmuirian adsorption kinetics to describe the rate of mass transfer (MT) from the bulk liquid in the column to the bound state. Equilibrium and kinetic adsorption data were determined for six different packed bed chromatographic adsorbents: two derivatised with rProtein A; and four functionalised with synthetic low molecular weight ligands. All adsorption isotherms were well described by the Langmuir model, whereas the data fitting to kinetic batch experiments showed that the model was inadequate after the first ∼25 min of adsorption for four of the six adsorbents. The model underestimated the dynamic Ig breakthough on packed beds of rProtein A Sepharose FF, MabSelect, MBI HyperCel, and MabSorbent A1P, applying a feedstock of 20–100% (v/v) clarified rabbit antiserum. However, when employing a maximum adsorption capacity 25% greater than that determined in batch binding studies, excellent agreement was obtained at all antiserum strengths for most adsorbents. Useful insights into scale-up and process design can be obtained by applying the model, without determining tentative parameters specific for each adsorbent and target protein concentration. However, the model parameters are solvent dependent so a prerequisite for its true applicability is that binding is both Langmuirian and essentially independent of the ionic strength of the feedstock applied.

[1]  H. Chase,et al.  Prediction of the performance of preparative affinity chromatography. , 1984, Journal of chromatography.

[2]  F. Maugeri,et al.  Modelling and simulation of the adsorption of the lipase from Geotrichum sp. on hydrophobic interaction columns , 2001, Biotechnology Letters.

[3]  R. Fletcher Practical Methods of Optimization , 1988 .

[4]  M. Kula,et al.  Visualizing two-component protein diffusion in porous adsorbents by confocal scanning laser microscopy. , 1999, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[5]  Amarjeet S. Bassi,et al.  A MODIFIED LANGMUIR MODEL FOR THE PREDICTION OF THE EFFECTS OF IONIC STRENGTH ON THE EQUILIBRIUM CHARACTERISTICS OF PROTEIN ADSORPTION ONTO ION EXCHANGE/AFFINITY ADSORBENTS , 2001 .

[6]  W. Norde,et al.  Adsorption of proteins from solution at the solid-liquid interface. , 1986, Advances in colloid and interface science.

[7]  H. A. Chase,et al.  Modeling the affinity adsorption of immunoglobulin G to protein A immobilised to agarose matrices , 1989 .

[8]  B. S. Baharin,et al.  Adsorption Behavior of Multicomponent Protein Mixtures Containing α1−Proteinase Inhibitor with the Anion Exchanger, 2‐(Diethylamino) ethyl‐Spherodex , 1997, Biotechnology progress.

[9]  E. Boschetti,et al.  Comparison of hydrophobic charge induction chromatography with affinity chromatography on protein A for harvest and purification of antibodies. , 2001, Journal of chromatography. A.

[10]  H. Chase,et al.  Two-component protein adsorption to the cation exchanger S Sepharose FF. , 1990, Journal of chromatography.

[11]  N. Harboe,et al.  Immunization, Isolation of Immunoglobulins and Antibody Titre Determination , 1983 .

[12]  N. Titchener-Hooker,et al.  Experimental measurement of particle size distribution and voidage in an expanded bed adsorption system. , 2000, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[13]  M. Kula,et al.  Dynamics of protein uptake within the adsorbent particle during packed bed chromatography. , 2002, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[14]  C. Lowe,et al.  Affinity chromatography on immobilized "biomimetic" ligands. Synthesis, immobilization and chromatographic assessment of an immunoglobulin G-binding ligand. , 2000, Journal of chromatography. B, Biomedical sciences and applications.

[15]  R. Guzman,et al.  Modeling Column Regeneration Effects on Dye−Ligand Affinity Chromatography , 1997 .

[16]  M. Kula,et al.  Isolation of monoclonal antibodies from cell containing hybridoma broth using a protein A coated adsorbent in expanded beds. , 1996, Journal of chromatography. A.

[17]  M T Hearn,et al.  CHEMICAL, PHYSICAL, AND BIOCHEMICAL CONCEPTS IN ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION OF PROTEINS* , 2001, Bioprocess technology.

[18]  Rate-limiting mass transfer in immunosorbents: characterisation of the adsorption of paraquat-protein conjugates to anti-paraquat Sepharose 4B , 1998, Bioseparation.

[19]  Jean M. J. Fréchet,et al.  New Designs of Macroporous Polymers and Supports: From Separation to Biocatalysis , 1996, Science.

[20]  C. Lowe,et al.  New developments in affinity chromatography with potential application in the production of biopharmaceuticals. , 2001, Journal of biochemical and biophysical methods.

[21]  Egisto Boschetti,et al.  Antibody separation by hydrophobic charge induction chromatography. , 2002, Trends in biotechnology.

[22]  E. Boschetti,et al.  A dual-mode approach to the selective separation of antibodies and their fragments. , 2001, Journal of chromatography. B, Biomedical sciences and applications.

[23]  A. Ljunglöf,et al.  Visualising intraparticle protein transport in porous adsorbents by confocal microscopy. , 1998, Journal of chromatography. A.

[24]  Yan Sun,et al.  Analysis of diffusion models for protein adsorption to porous anion-exchange adsorbent. , 2002, Journal of chromatography. A.

[25]  Howard A. Chase,et al.  Modelling single-component protein adsorption to the cation exchanger s sepharose® FF , 1990 .

[26]  M. Hearn,et al.  Comparative studies on the isothermal characteristics of proteins adsorbed under batch equilibrium conditions to ion-exchange, immobilised metal ion affinity and dye affinity matrices with different ionic strength and temperature conditions. , 1997, Journal of chromatography. A.

[27]  P. Gustavsson,et al.  Pellicular expanded bed matrix suitable for high flow rates. , 2000, Journal of chromatography. A.

[28]  James T. Hsu,et al.  Effects of ligand concentration on protein adsorption in dye-ligand adsorbents , 1992 .

[29]  J. Stickel,et al.  Pressure‐Flow Relationships for Packed Beds of Compressible Chromatography Media at Laboratory and Production Scale , 2001, Biotechnology progress.

[30]  P. Larsson,et al.  Theories of chromatographic efficiency applied to expanded beds. , 2001, Journal of chromatography. A.

[31]  G. Zacchi,et al.  Mathematical modelling and parametric studies of affinity chromatography , 1994 .

[32]  P. V. Danckwerts Continuous flow systems , 1953 .

[33]  M. Etzel,et al.  Competitive adsorption of α-lactalbumin and bovine serum albumin to a sulfopropyl ion-exchange membrane , 1994 .

[34]  O. Thomas,et al.  Evaluation of commercial chromatographic adsorbents for the direct capture of polyclonal rabbit antibodies from clarified antiserum. , 2007, Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences.

[35]  F. Arnold,et al.  Analysis of affinity separations II: The characterization of affinity columns by pulse techniques , 1985 .

[36]  D. Harding,et al.  Salt-independent adsorption chromatography: new broad-spectrum affinity methods for protein capture. , 2001, Journal of biochemical and biophysical methods.

[37]  G. Meiklejohn,et al.  Influenza vaccination; a comparison of antibody response obtained by various methods of administration. , 1949, Journal of immunology.

[38]  O. Thomas,et al.  High-throughput immunoturbidimetric assays for in-process determination of polyclonal antibody concentration and functionality in crude samples. , 2007, Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences.

[39]  Pauline M. Doran,et al.  Bioprocess Engineering Principles , 1995 .