Long-term follow-up of retinitis pigmentosa patients with multifocal electroretinography.

PURPOSE To study the rate of multifocal electroretinographic (mfERG) response amplitude changes and their relation to other parameters of disease development in retinitis pigmentosa (RP). METHODS Twenty-three patients (9 men and 14 women) with clinically defined RP were included in the study. Disease progression was monitored during a period of up to 10 years by psychophysical techniques and Ganzfeld electroretinography. In addition, ERGs were recorded with a mfERG imaging system (VERIS; Electro-Diagnostic Imaging, Inc., Redwood City, CA). The black and white stimulus consisted of 61 hexagons covering a visual field of approximately 60 degrees x 55 degrees . Responses were analyzed according to concentric ring averages. RESULTS The progression of visual field loss for target III4e was approximately 14.5%. Using the same type of regression model, the yearly progression according to the mfERG values was found to be approximately 6% to 10% in the outer three rings. Visual acuity (median 0.8) correlated well with the amplitude of the central segment of the mfERGs, ring 5 amplitudes of the mfERG strongly correlated with the scotopic Ganzfeld ERG mixed cone-rod response amplitude. However, in advanced cases, reliable mfERG responses could still be recorded, even if the ISCEV scotopic Ganzfeld ERG was not reproducible. MfERG ring 5 amplitudes as well as the Ganzfeld ERG mixed cone-rod response amplitude showed only a mild correlation with visual field area. CONCLUSIONS The mfERG allows long-term follow-up of disease progression in retinitis pigmentosa. It does not replace, but complements psychophysical methods and could be used as an objective outcome measure in upcoming treatment studies involving patients with advanced retinal diseases.

[1]  R G Weleber,et al.  Computerized quantitative analysis of kinetic visual fields. , 1986, American journal of ophthalmology.

[2]  P. Onori,et al.  Correlation between Goldmann perimetry and maximal electroretinogram response in retinitis pigmentosa , 2005, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[3]  T. Friberg,et al.  Natural course of retinitis pigmentosa over a three-year interval. , 1985, American journal of ophthalmology.

[4]  R. A. Pagon,et al.  Retinitis pigmentosa. , 1988, Survey of ophthalmology.

[5]  P. Lanthony [Evaluation of the desaturated Panel D-15. I. Method of quantification and normal scores]. , 1986, Journal francais d'ophtalmologie.

[6]  Donald C. Hood,et al.  ISCEV guidelines for clinical multifocal electroretinography (2007 edition) , 2007, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[7]  E Zrenner,et al.  Multifocal electroretinography in retinitis pigmentosa. , 1998, American journal of ophthalmology.

[8]  J. Heckenlively RP cone-rod degeneration. , 1987, Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society.

[9]  L. Gränse,et al.  Full-field ERG, multifocal ERG and multifocal VEP in patients with retinitis pigmentosa and residual central visual fields. , 2004, Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica.

[10]  G. Fish,et al.  Yearly rates of rod and cone functional loss in retinitis pigmentosa and cone-rod dystrophy. , 1999, Ophthalmology.

[11]  R. Massof,et al.  Properties of electroretinographic intensity-response functions in retinitis pigmentosa , 1984, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[12]  B Rosner,et al.  The relationship between visual field size and electroretinogram amplitude in retinitis pigmentosa. , 1996, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[13]  S. Brodie,et al.  Electrophysiologic testing in disorders of the retina, optic nerve, and visual pathway , 1991 .

[14]  A. Geller,et al.  A table of color distance scores for quantitative scoring of the Lanthony Desaturate color vision test. , 2001, Neurotoxicology and teratology.

[16]  G. Fishman,et al.  Rate of visual field loss in retinitis pigmentosa. , 1997, Ophthalmology.

[17]  M. Bock,et al.  A comparison of two multifocal ERG systems , 1998, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[18]  T. Kirkham,et al.  Visual field area on the Goldmann hemispheric perimeter surface. Correction of cartographic errors inherent in perimetry. , 1981, Current eye research.

[19]  K. Bowman,et al.  A METHOD FOR QUANTITATIVE SCORING OF THE FARNSWORTH PANEL D‐15 , 1982, Acta ophthalmologica.

[20]  P E King-Smith,et al.  A quantitative scoring technique for panel tests of color vision. , 1988, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[21]  Robert W. Massof,et al.  First order dynamics of visual field loss in retinitis pigmentosa , 1990 .

[22]  Erich E. Sutter,et al.  The field topography of ERG components in man—I. The photopic luminance response , 1992, Vision Research.

[23]  G. Somes,et al.  Kinetics of visual field loss in Usher syndrome Type II. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[24]  R. Carr,et al.  Rates of change differ among measures of visual function in patients with retinitis pigmentosa. , 1996, Ophthalmology.

[25]  E. Birch,et al.  The relationship between rod perimetric thresholds and full-field rod ERGs in retinitis pigmentosa. , 1987, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[26]  E. Aulhorn,et al.  Correlations between electroretinography, morphology and function in retinitis pigmentosa , 2004, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[27]  G. Rudolph,et al.  The role of fixation for reliable mfERG results , 2002, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[28]  M. Marmor “Do you, doctor, take the mfERG...for better or for worse?” , 2002, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[29]  M. Seeliger,et al.  Identification of Usher syndrome subtypes by ERG implicit time. , 2001, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[30]  P. Herse,et al.  Retinitis pigmentosa: visual function and multidisciplinary management , 2005, Clinical & experimental optometry.

[31]  B. Brown,et al.  Investigation of retinitis pigmentosa using the multifocal electroretinogram , 1998, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[32]  Donald C Hood,et al.  The Multifocal Electroretinogram , 2003, Journal of neuro-ophthalmology : the official journal of the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society.

[33]  R. Carr,et al.  Test–retest reliability of the multifocal electroretinogram and Humphrey visual fields in patients with retinitis pigmentosa , 2004, Documenta Ophthalmologica.