The Development of a Symptom Questionnaire for Assessing Virtual Reality Viewing Using a Head-Mounted Display

Purpose. Virtual reality devices, including virtual reality head-mounted displays, are becoming increasingly accessible to the general public as technological advances lead to reduced costs. However, there are numerous reports that adverse effects such as ocular discomfort and headache are associated with these devices. To investigate these adverse effects, questionnaires that have been specifically designed for other purposes such as investigating motion sickness have often been used. The primary purpose of this study was to develop a standard questionnaire for use in investigating symptoms that result from virtual reality viewing. In addition, symptom duration and whether priming subjects elevates symptom ratings were also investigated. Methods. A list of the most frequently reported symptoms following virtual reality viewing was determined from previously published studies and used as the basis for a pilot questionnaire. The pilot questionnaire, which consisted of 12 nonocular and 11 ocular symptoms, was administered to two groups of eight subjects. One group was primed by having them complete the questionnaire before immersion; the other group completed the questionnaire postviewing only. Postviewing testing was carried out immediately after viewing and then at 2-min intervals for a further 10 min. Results. Priming subjects did not elevate symptom ratings; therefore, the data were pooled and 16 symptoms were found to increase significantly. The majority of symptoms dissipated rapidly, within 6 min after viewing. Frequency of endorsement data showed that approximately half of the symptoms on the pilot questionnaire could be discarded because <20% of subjects experienced them. Conclusions. Symptom questionnaires to investigate virtual reality viewing can be administered before viewing, without biasing the findings, allowing calculation of the amount of change from pre- to postviewing. However, symptoms dissipate rapidly and assessment of symptoms needs to occur in the first 5 min postviewing. Thirteen symptom questions, eight nonocular and five ocular, were determined to be useful for a questionnaire specifically related to virtual reality viewing using a head-mounted display.

[1]  Robert W Massof,et al.  Psychometric properties of the Veterans Affairs Low-Vision Visual Functioning Questionnaire. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[2]  Eugenia M. Kolasinski,et al.  Prediction of simulator sickness in a virtual environment , 1996 .

[3]  Konrad Pesudovs,et al.  The Activities of Daily Vision Scale for cataract surgery outcomes: re-evaluating validity with Rasch analysis. , 2003, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[4]  A Oohira,et al.  Influence on visual function by a stereoscopic TV programme with binocular liquid crystal shutter and Hi-Vision TV display. , 1996, Ergonomics.

[5]  G Grimby,et al.  Scoring alternatives for FIM in neurological disorders applying Rasch analysis , 2005, Acta neurologica Scandinavica.

[6]  W. N. Charman,et al.  Dependence of accommodation response on the spatial frequency spectrum of the observed object , 1977, Vision Research.

[7]  P. Howarth,et al.  The occurrence of virtual simulation sickness symptoms when an HMD was used as a personal viewing system , 1997 .

[8]  Scott Isensee,et al.  The Perception of Flicker and Glare on Computer CRT Displays , 1982, Human factors.

[9]  Minoru Takahashi,et al.  Body sway induced by 3D images , 1997, Electronic Imaging.

[10]  L. Rajmil.  Health measurement scales. A practical guide to their development and use, 3rd ed , 2005 .

[11]  S Nichols,et al.  Physical ergonomics of virtual environment use. , 1999, Applied ergonomics.

[12]  John R. Wilson,et al.  Effects of participating in virtual environmentsa review of current knowledge , 1996 .

[13]  M. Mon-Williams,et al.  Binocular vision in a virtual world: visual deficits following the wearing of a head‐mounted display , 1993, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[14]  J T Reason,et al.  Motion Sickness Adaptation: A Neural Mismatch Model 1 , 1978, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[15]  U. Munzel,et al.  A nonparametric test for proving noninferiority in clinical trials with ordered categorical data , 2003 .

[16]  E. C. Regan,et al.  The efficacy of hyoscine hydrobromide in reducing side-effects induced during immersion in virtual reality. , 1996, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[17]  J. Lovie-Kitchin,et al.  The development of the LV Prasad-Functional Vision Questionnaire: a measure of functional vision performance of visually impaired children. , 2003, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[18]  C. Terwee,et al.  Psychometric properties of vision‐related quality of life questionnaires: a systematic review , 2004, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[19]  E. Peli,et al.  The visual effects of head-mounted display (HMD) are not distinguishable from those of desk-top computer display , 1998, Vision Research.

[20]  John R. Wilson,et al.  Virtual Reality-Induced Symptoms and Effects (VRISE) , 1999, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[21]  R D Gilson,et al.  Ataxia following exposure to a virtual environment. , 1999, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[22]  R. Massof,et al.  A self-assessment instrument designed for measuring independent mobility in RP patients: generalizability to glaucoma patients. , 2002, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[23]  Regan Ec,et al.  The frequency of occurrence and severity of side-effects of immersion virtual reality. , 1994 .

[24]  Richard A. Stevick,et al.  Response Differences and Preferences for All-Category-Defined and End-Defined Likert Formats , 1984 .

[25]  E. C. Regan,et al.  The frequency of occurrence and severity of side-effects of immersion virtual reality. , 1994, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[26]  H W Leibowitz,et al.  Night myopia and the intermediate dark focus of accommodation. , 1975, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[27]  Ramsey Ad,et al.  The efficacy of hyoscine hydrobromide in reducing side-effects induced during immersion in virtual reality. , 1996 .

[28]  M Brüwer,et al.  Preferred vertical gaze direction and observation distance. , 1991, Ergonomics.

[29]  Mark Mon-Williams,et al.  Binocular Virtual Reality Displays: When Problems Do and Don't Occur , 1998, Hum. Factors.

[30]  E F Cook,et al.  Development of the Activities of Daily Vision Scale: A Measure of Visual Functional Status , 1992, Medical care.

[31]  P A Howarth,et al.  The nauseogenicity of two methods of navigating within a virtual environment. , 1999, Applied ergonomics.

[32]  Y. Yeh,et al.  Limits of Fusion and Depth Judgment in Stereoscopic Color Displays , 1990, Human factors.

[33]  G. A. Miller.  THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[34]  Paul Kline,et al.  A Handbook of Test Construction : Introduction to Psychometric Design , 1987 .

[35]  D. Bouwhuis,et al.  Perceived depth and the feeling of presence in 3DTV , 1998 .

[36]  Robert S. Kennedy,et al.  Simulator Sickness Questionnaire: An enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. , 1993 .

[37]  E. C. Regan.  Some evidence of adaptation to immersion in virtual reality , 1995 .

[38]  R. Kennedy,et al.  Profile analysis of after-effects experienced during exposure to several virtual reality environments , 1994 .

[39]  S. Welleck,et al.  A Distribution-Free Two-Sample Equivalence Test Allowing for Tied Observations , 1999 .

[40]  K Ukai,et al.  Changes in oculomotor functions before and after loading of a 3-D visually-guided task by using a head-mounted display. , 1996, Ergonomics.

[41]  R. Sitgreaves.  Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). , 1979 .

[42]  Simon K. Rushton,et al.  Binocular vision in a bi-ocular world: new-generation head-mounted displays avoid causing visual deficit , 1994 .