Assessing urban containment policies within a suburban context—An approach to enable a regional perspective

Regarding suburbanisation, land policies in many countries have undergone profound changes over the past 20 years. While experiencing high growth rates of urban land, policies were reconsidered and adapted with the goal of limiting land consumption in favour of a more sustainable urban development. These changes aim at a higher effectiveness in steering urbanisation processes to limit environmental impacts, but also are criticized regarding possible effects on a sufficient supply of housing. To this regard, also German urban planning policies show considerable dynamics. After several urban containment policies were introduced, the question arises on how to empirically assess their effects. Therefore, monitoring approaches with a regional perspective become more and more relevant, as polycentric, suburban settlement structures constitute the spatial but also institutional context of urban containment policies. Considering suburbanisation as a global phenomenon, we develop a monitoring approach, which allows for a quantitative and qualitative assessment within suburban settlement structures. We propose a set of indicators that integrates urban structure, regional accessibility and usage by population. As data is scarce for a city-regional perspective, we combine geospatial methods for an automatic identification of building types from topographic data and maps, for measuring multi-modal accessibility and for small scale demographic analysis. The approach is applied to the case of a German city-region with splintered planning institutions. The results of the small-scale, but also comprehensive regional analysis allow for a detailed discussion of effects of policy changes on the settlement structure.

[1]  E. Csaplovics,et al.  A GEOBIA APPROACH TO MAP INTERPRETATION – MULTITEMPROAL BUILDING FOOTPRINT RETRIEVAL FOR HIGH RESOLUTION MONITORING OF SPATIAL URBAN DYNAMICS , 2012 .

[2]  I. Benenson,et al.  Public transport versus private car GIS-based estimation of accessibility applied to the Tel Aviv metropolitan area , 2011 .

[3]  Hendrik Herold,et al.  Analyzing building stock using topographic maps and GIS , 2009 .

[4]  N. Phelps The Growth Machine Stops? Urban Politics and the Making and Remaking of an Edge City , 2012 .

[5]  Carola Kunze,et al.  Semantic enrichment of building data with volunteered geographic information to improve mappings of dwelling units and population , 2015, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[6]  Maria Tsakiri-Strati,et al.  Monitoring urban changes based on scale-space filtering and object-oriented classification , 2012, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[7]  Hilde Heynen,et al.  Towards a sustainable transformation of the detached houses in peri-urban Flanders, Belgium , 2015 .

[8]  R. Ewing Characteristics, Causes, and Effects of Sprawl: A Literature Review , 2008 .

[9]  T. Spit,et al.  Dilemmas of involvement in land management – Comparing an active (Dutch) and a passive (German) approach , 2015 .

[10]  Hugh Millward,et al.  Urban containment strategies: A case-study appraisal of plans and policies in Japanese, British, and Canadian cities , 2006 .

[11]  R. Fox-Kämper,et al.  Demography-driven suburban decline? At the crossroads: mature single-family housing estates in Germany , 2014 .

[12]  Angi Voß,et al.  A Comparison of the Street Networks of Navteq and OSM in Germany , 2011, AGILE Conf..

[13]  Fernando Bação,et al.  The Third Dimension in Urban Geography: The Urban-Volume Approach , 2009 .

[14]  Stephan Nebiker,et al.  Building Change Detection from Historical Aerial Photographs Using Dense Image Matching and Object-Based Image Analysis , 2014, Remote. Sens..

[15]  F. Kroll,et al.  Does demographic change affect land use patterns?: A case study from Germany , 2010 .

[16]  Luca Bertolini,et al.  Sustainable accessibility: a conceptual framework to integrate transport and land use plan-making. Two test-applications in the Netherlands and a reflection on the way forward , 2005 .

[17]  Shiyong Cui,et al.  Building Change Detection Based on Satellite Stereo Imagery and Digital Surface Models , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[18]  Robert W. Burchell,et al.  Smart growth: More than a ghost of urban policy past, less than a bold new horizon , 2000 .

[19]  Jochen A. G. Jaeger,et al.  Suitability criteria for measures of urban sprawl , 2010 .

[20]  Frank Osterhage,et al.  Demographic change and migration in city regions: Results from two German case studies , 2008 .

[21]  Felix Kienast,et al.  Analysis of historic landscape patterns with a Geographical Information System — a methodological outline , 1993, Landscape Ecology.

[22]  K. Jacobsen,et al.  3D BUILDING CHANGE DETECTION USING HIGH RESOLUTION STEREO IMAGES AND A GIS DATABASE , 2012 .

[23]  H. Herold An Evolutionary Approach to Adaptive Image Analysis for Retrieving and Long-term Monitoring Historical Land Use from Spatiotemporally Heterogeneous Map Sources , 2014 .

[24]  K. Williams,et al.  Sustainable Land Reuse: The Influence of Different Stakeholders in Achieving Sustainable Brownfield Developments in England , 2006 .

[25]  Felix Kienast,et al.  Multi-scale analysis of urban sprawl in Europe: towards a European de-sprawling strategy , 2015 .

[26]  Jochen A.G. Jaeger,et al.  Improving the measurement of urban sprawl: Weighted Urban Proliferation (WUP) and its application to Switzerland , 2014 .

[27]  Gotthard Meinel,et al.  Automatic identification of building types based on topographic databases – a comparison of different data sources , 2015 .

[28]  A. Downs Smart Growth: Why We Discuss It More than We Do It , 2005 .

[29]  Gregor Lang-Wojtasik,et al.  Gemeinsam in eine nachhaltige Zukunft? Anmerkungen zum "Bericht der Bundesregierung zur Bildung für eine nachhaltige Entwicklung" , 2002 .

[30]  Carey Curtis,et al.  Using New Accessibility Tools to Guide Policy Innovation , 2013 .

[31]  Nadja Kabisch,et al.  Diversifying European agglomerations: evidence of urban population trends for the 21st century , 2011 .

[32]  Erwin van der Krabben,et al.  The adaptive efficiency of land use planning measured by the control of urban sprawl. The cases of the Netherlands, Belgium and Poland , 2012 .

[33]  Kilian Bizer,et al.  Tradable planning permits for land-use control in Germany , 2010 .

[34]  Michael Batty,et al.  Cities and complexity - understanding cities with cellular automata, agent-based models, and fractals , 2007 .

[35]  E. Lambin,et al.  Long‐term land‐cover changes in the Belgian Ardennes (1775–1929): model‐based reconstruction vs. historical maps , 2002 .

[36]  A. Decoville,et al.  Can the 2050 zero land take objective of the EU be reliably monitored? A comparative study , 2015 .

[37]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[38]  Robin Ganser,et al.  Brownfield Development: Are We Using the Right Targets? Evidence from England and Germany , 2007 .

[39]  Andres Sevtsuk,et al.  Urban network analysis. A new toolbox for ArcGIS , 2012, Rev. Int. Géomatique.

[40]  F. Kroll,et al.  The Relation of Diverging Urban Growth Processes and Demographic Change along an Urban–Rural Gradient , 2012 .

[41]  Maria Teresa Borzacchiello,et al.  Accessibility and Urban Development: A Grid-Based Comparative Statistical Analysis of Dutch Cities , 2010 .

[42]  Stefan Siedentop,et al.  Monitoring urban sprawl in Germany: towards a GIS-based measurement and assessment approach , 2010 .

[43]  Carey Curtis,et al.  Planning for sustainable accessibility: Developing tools to aid discussion and decision-making , 2010 .

[44]  A. Zipf,et al.  A Comparative Study of Proprietary Geodata and Volunteered Geographic Information for Germany , 2010 .

[45]  Arthur Christian Nelson,et al.  Urban containment policies and housing prices: an international comparison with implications for future research , 2002 .

[46]  B. Davy Essential Injustice: When Legal Institutions Cannot Resolve Environmental and Land Use Disputes , 1997 .