Optical Stimulation of the Auditory Nerve

Improvements in cochlear implant devices during the last decade have mainly been achieved through novel coding strategies rather than through improvement of the neural interface. The neural interface, however, is a bottleneck for transferring information from the cochlear implant to the auditory nerve. Electric current spreads in the tissue and neighboring electrode contacts cannot be considered independent stimulation sources. Simultaneous transfer of information at adjacent electrodes may lead to deleterious interactions. Therefore, contemporary coding strategies use sequential stimulation paradigms that avoid simultaneous stimulation at neighboring electrode contacts. These coding strategies provide good speech recognition in quiet listening environments but fail in noisy backgrounds. It has been argued that an increase in the number of independent channels that transfer information to the auditory nerve could improve patient performance in noisy listening environments. Therefore, an important objective in implant electrode design is to maximize the spatial selectivity of stimulation.

[1]  Joseph T. Walsh,et al.  Optical stimulation of auditory neurons: Effects of acute and chronic deafening , 2008, Hearing Research.

[2]  Anita Mahadevan-Jansen,et al.  Biophysical mechanisms of transient optical stimulation of peripheral nerve. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[3]  R V Shannon,et al.  Speech recognition as a function of the number of electrodes used in the SPEAK cochlear implant speech processor. , 1997, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[4]  Feng Zhang,et al.  Channelrhodopsin-2 and optical control of excitable cells , 2006, Nature Methods.

[5]  I. Hochmair-Desoyer,et al.  PERCEPTS FROM THE VIENNA COCHLEAR PROSTHESIS a , 1983, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[6]  Johan Frijns,et al.  The Facial Nerve Canal: An Important Cochlear Conduction Path Revealed by Clarion Electrical Field Imaging , 2004, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[7]  M F Dorman,et al.  The recognition of sentences in noise by normal-hearing listeners using simulations of cochlear-implant signal processors with 6-20 channels. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  P. Konrad,et al.  Optical stimulation of neural tissue in vivo. , 2005, Optics letters.

[9]  Matti Anniko,et al.  Transient receptor potential channels in the inner ear: presence of transient receptor potential channel subfamily 1 and 4 in the guinea pig inner ear , 2005, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[10]  P. Stypulkowski,et al.  Single fiber mapping of spatial excitation patterns in the electrically stimulated auditory nerve , 1987, Hearing Research.

[11]  D. Julius,et al.  The capsaicin receptor: a heat-activated ion channel in the pain pathway , 1997, Nature.

[12]  Sharon Thomsen,et al.  Optically mediated nerve stimulation: Identification of injury thresholds , 2007, Lasers in surgery and medicine.

[13]  Li-Ming Su,et al.  Noncontact stimulation of the cavernous nerves in the rat prostate using a tunable-wavelength thulium fiber laser. , 2008, Journal of endourology.

[14]  Qian-Jie Fu,et al.  The number of spectral channels required for speech recognition depends on the difficulty of the listening situation. , 2004, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[15]  P R Kileny,et al.  Effects of channel number and place of stimulation on performance with the Cochlear Corporation multichannel implant. , 1992, The American journal of otology.

[16]  D T Lawson,et al.  New processing strategies for multichannel cochlear prostheses. , 1993, Progress in brain research.

[17]  R. C. Black,et al.  Current distributions in the cat cochlea: A modelling and electrophysiological study , 1985, Hearing Research.

[18]  G. M. Hale,et al.  Optical Constants of Water in the 200-nm to 200-microm Wavelength Region. , 1973, Applied optics.

[19]  Graeme M. Clark,et al.  Current Distribution Measurements Within the Human Cochlea , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[20]  M. Liberman,et al.  Intracellular labeling of auditory nerve fibers in guinea pig: central and peripheral projections , 1997 .

[21]  Steven L. Jacques,et al.  Laser Tissue Interaction XIII: Photochemical, Photothermal, and Photomechanical , 1999 .

[22]  Holger Lubatschowski,et al.  Green laser light activates the inner ear. , 2009, Journal of biomedical optics.

[23]  K. Deisseroth,et al.  Millisecond-timescale, genetically targeted optical control of neural activity , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[24]  J. C. Middlebrooks,et al.  Auditory Prosthesis with a Penetrating Nerve Array , 2007, Journal for the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[25]  Jiefu Zheng,et al.  Vanilloid receptors in hearing: altered cochlear sensitivity by vanilloids and expression of TRPV1 in the organ of corti. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  Holmes Ae,et al.  The effects of varying the number of cochlear implant electrodes on speech perception. , 1987 .

[27]  D. D. Greenwood A cochlear frequency-position function for several species--29 years later. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  R. Shannon,et al.  Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  L M Collins,et al.  Comparison of electrode discrimination, pitch ranking, and pitch scaling data in postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant subjects. , 1997, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  John C. Middlebrooks,et al.  Topographic Spread of Inferior Colliculus Activation in Response to Acoustic and Intracochlear Electric Stimulation , 2004, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[31]  Rainer Hartmann,et al.  Spatial resolution of cochlear implants: the electrical field and excitation of auditory afferents , 1998, Hearing Research.

[32]  M Dorman,et al.  Consonant recognition as a function of the number of channels of stimulation by patients who use the Symbion cochlear implant. , 1989, Ear and hearing.

[33]  Jagmeet Mundi,et al.  Laser stimulation of single auditory nerve fibers , 2010, The Laryngoscope.

[34]  Claus-Peter Richter,et al.  Infrared neural stimulation: Beam path in the guinea pig cochlea , 2011, Hearing Research.

[35]  Craig Montell,et al.  The TRP Superfamily of Cation Channels , 2005, Science's STKE.

[36]  J. T Rubinstein,et al.  Pseudospontaneous activity: stochastic independence of auditory nerve fibers with electrical stimulation , 1999, Hearing Research.

[37]  Anita Mahadevan-Jansen,et al.  Combined optical and electrical stimulation of neural tissue in vivo. , 2009, Journal of biomedical optics.

[38]  M. Merzenich,et al.  Neuronal discharge rate is unsuitable for encoding sound intensity at the inferior-colliculus level , 1988, Hearing Research.

[39]  John C. Middlebrooks,et al.  Cochlear implant electrode configuration effects on activation threshold and tonotopic selectivity , 2008, Hearing Research.

[40]  Makoto Tominaga,et al.  Heat-Evoked Activation of the Ion Channel, TRPV4 , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[41]  C W Turner,et al.  Use of temporal envelope cues in speech recognition by normal and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[42]  Claus-Peter Richter,et al.  Optical Stimulation of the Facial Nerve: A New Monitoring Technique? , 2007, The Laryngoscope.

[43]  Jianxun Zhou,et al.  Type 1 vanilloid receptor expression by mammalian inner ear ganglion cells , 2003, Hearing Research.

[44]  Anita Mahadevan-Jansen,et al.  Pulsed laser versus electrical energy for peripheral nerve stimulation , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[45]  Claus-Peter Richter,et al.  Laser stimulation of the auditory nerve , 2006, Lasers in surgery and medicine.

[46]  Anita Mahadevan-Jansen,et al.  Application of infrared light for in vivo neural stimulation. , 2005, Journal of biomedical optics.

[47]  M. Dorman,et al.  Speech intelligibility as a function of the number of channels of stimulation for signal processors using sine-wave and noise-band outputs. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[48]  M. Niemz Laser-Tissue Interactions , 1996 .

[49]  Hugh J. McDermott,et al.  Principles of design and biological approaches for improving the selectivity of cochlear implant electrodes , 2009, Journal of neural engineering.

[50]  G. Schultz,et al.  From worm to man: three subfamilies of TRP channels , 2000, Trends in Neurosciences.

[51]  Donald Robertson,et al.  Horseradish peroxidase injection of physiologically characterized afferent and efferent neurones in the guinea pig spiral ganglion , 1984, Hearing Research.

[52]  C. Richter,et al.  Spread of cochlear excitation during stimulation with pulsed infrared radiation: inferior colliculus measurements , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[53]  Joseph T. Walsh,et al.  Optical Parameter Variability in Laser Nerve Stimulation: A Study of Pulse Duration, Repetition Rate, and Wavelength , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[54]  F Honegger,et al.  Synergies and strategies underlying normal and vestibulary deficient control of balance: implication for neuroprosthetic control. , 1993, Progress in brain research.

[55]  S J Norton,et al.  The effects of limiting the number of Nucleus 22 cochlear implant electrodes programmed on speech perception. , 1992, Ear and hearing.

[56]  Dirk Trauner,et al.  New photochemical tools for controlling neuronal activity , 2009, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[57]  Claus-Peter Richter,et al.  Optical cochlear implants: Evaluation of surgical approach and laser parameters in cats , 2010, Hearing Research.

[58]  E S Hochmair,et al.  PERCEPTS ELICITED BY DIFFERENT SPEECH‐CODING STRATEGIES a , 1983, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.