The Impacts of Domain-General vs. Domain-Specific Diagramming Tools on Writing

Argument diagramming is the process of spatially representing an argument by its component parts and their relationships. A growing body of evidence supports the use of argument diagramming to aid student learning and writing within disciplines including science education. However, most of these studies have focused on basic contrasts between diagramming and no diagramming. The purpose of this study was to learn how different diagramming frameworks affect the benefits afforded by argument diagramming. Three groups of undergraduate students in psychology research methods lab courses were given either no diagramming support, support with a domain-general framework, or support with a domain-specific framework to help them write a research paper introduction. Students given any diagramming support included more relevant citations and considered opposing citations in their papers. Students using the domain-specific framework wrote more about the scientific validity of cited studies than the other two groups, whereas students using the domain-general framework trended towards included more supporting citations.

[1]  R. Shepard.  Recognition memory for words, sentences, and pictures , 1967 .

[2]  L. Standing.  Learning 10000 pictures , 1973 .

[3]  K. Kirsner,et al.  Long-term memory for pictures and sentences , 1981, Memory & cognition.

[4]  G. Stricker,et al.  Handbook of Developmental Psychology , 1982 .

[5]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Why a Diagram is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words , 1987, Cogn. Sci..

[6]  David N. Perkins,et al.  Everyday reasoning and the roots of intelligence , 1991 .

[7]  D. Dansereau,et al.  A Convergent Paradigm for Examining Knowledge Mapping as a Learning Strategy , 1991 .

[8]  Ruth E. Knudson.  Analysis of Argumentative Writing at Two Grade Levels , 1992 .

[9]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Right Representation for Discovery: Finding the Conservation of Momentum , 1992, ML.

[10]  Norman G. Lederman.  Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research , 1992 .

[11]  K. de Glopper,et al.  Argumentation in written discourse: secondary school students' writing problems. , 1994 .

[12]  Alvin I. Goldman,et al.  Argumentation and Social Epistemology , 1994 .

[13]  Richard Andrews,et al.  Teaching and Learning Argument , 1995 .

[14]  L. Malone,et al.  Effects of Graphic Organizer Instruction on Fifth-Grade Students , 1995 .

[15]  Vaughan Prain,et al.  Using the science writing heuristic as a tool for learning from laboratory investigations in secondary science , 1999 .

[16]  Laura R. Novick,et al.  Spatial diagrams: Key instruments in the toolbox for thought , 2000 .

[17]  Paul Stapleton,et al.  Assessing Critical Thinking in the Writing of Japanese University Students , 2001 .

[18]  Richard Andrews,et al.  Essays in Argument , 2001 .

[19]  Vaughan Prain,et al.  Influences of Writing Tasks on Students' Answers to Recall and Higher-Level Test Questions , 2002 .

[20]  Kuo-En Chang,et al.  The Effect of Concept Mapping to Enhance Text Comprehension and Summarization , 2002 .

[21]  Peter,et al.  DIAGRAMMATIC REASONING IN SCIENTIFIC DISCOVERY : MODELLING GALILEO ’ S KINEMATIC DIAGRAMS 1 , 2002 .

[22]  D. Suthers.  Representational guidance for collaborative inquiry. , 2003 .

[23]  Selma Leitão,et al.  Evaluating and Selecting Counterarguments , 2003 .

[24]  Yair Neuman,et al.  Construction of Collective and Individual Knowledge in Argumentative Activity , 2003 .

[25]  Brian Hand,et al.  Using a Science Writing Heuristic to enhance learning outcomes from laboratory activities in seventh‐grade science: quantitative and qualitative aspects , 2004 .

[26]  Susan Bell Trickett,et al.  Connecting Internal and External Representations: Spatial Transformations of Scientific Visualizations , 2005 .

[27]  K. Topping.  Trends in Peer Learning , 2005 .

[28]  G. Ritchey,et al.  Long-Term Memory for Pictures , 2005 .

[29]  Andrew T. Stull,et al.  Three Experimental Comparisons of Learner-generated versus Author-provided Graphic Organizers , 2007 .

[30]  Christian D. Schunn,et al.  Scaffolded writing and rewriting in the discipline: A web-based reciprocal peer review system , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[31]  E. Nussbaum,et al.  Promoting Argument-Counterargument Integration in Students' Writing , 2007 .

[32]  Karsten Stegmann,et al.  Facilitating argumentative knowledge construction with computer-supported collaboration scripts , 2007, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[33]  Maralee Harrell.  No Computer Program Required : Even Pencil-and-Paper Argument Mapping Improves Critical-Thinking Skills , 2008 .

[34]  M. A. Britt,et al.  Argumentation Schema and the Myside Bias in Written Argumentation , 2009 .

[35]  Richard Andrews,et al.  Argumentation in Higher Education: Improving Practice Through Theory and Research , 2009 .

[36]  Sharlene A. Kiuhara,et al.  Teaching writing to high school students: A national survey , 2009 .

[37]  Christian D. Schunn,et al.  Developing Writing Skills Through Students Giving Instructional Explanations , 2010 .

[38]  Christopher R. Wolfe,et al.  Argumentation Across the Curriculum , 2011 .

[39]  D. Murphey,et al.  Academically Adrift: Limited Learning on College Campuses , 2011 .

[40]  Maralee Harrell.  Argument diagramming and critical thinking in introductory philosophy , 2011 .

[41]  K. Holyoak,et al.  The Oxford handbook of thinking and reasoning , 2012 .

[42]  Maralee Harrell,et al.  Assessing the Efficacy of Argument Diagramming to Teach Critical Thinking Skills in Introduction to Philosophy , 2012 .

[43]  Daniel R. Wissinger,et al.  Adolescents’ Disciplinary Use of Evidence, Argumentative Strategies, and Organizational Structure in Writing About Historical Controversies , 2012 .

[44]  T. Anderson,et al.  Design-Based Research , 2012 .

[45]  Karsten Stegmann,et al.  Collaborative argumentation and cognitive elaboration in a computer-supported collaborative learning environment , 2012 .

[46]  Maralee Harrell,et al.  Improving First-Year Writing Using Argument Diagramming , 2013, CogSci.

[47]  Niels Pinkwart,et al.  LASAD: Flexible representations for computer-based collaborative argumentation , 2013, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[48]  Shirley Simon,et al.  Learning to argue: A study of four schools and their attempt to develop the use of argumentation as a common instructional practice and its impact on students , 2013 .

[49]  D. Kuhn,et al.  Developing Norms of Argumentation: Metacognitive, Epistemological, and Social Dimensions of Developing Argumentive Competence , 2013 .

[50]  Collin Lynch,et al.  The diagnosticity of argument diagrams , 2014 .

[51]  Evangelia Chryssafidou,et al.  Argument diagramming and planning cognition in argumentative writing , 2014 .

[52]  Kevin D. Ashley,et al.  Can Diagrams Predict Essay Grades? , 2014, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[53]  Rainer Bromme,et al.  How source information shapes lay interpretations of science conflicts: interplay between sourcing, conflict explanation, source evaluation, and claim evaluation , 2016 .

[54]  Benjamin Naumann,et al.  Mental Representations A Dual Coding Approach , 2016 .

[55]  Karin Baier,et al.  The Uses Of Argument , 2016 .

[56]  Judith A. Langer,et al.  A Snapshot of Writing Instruction in Middle Schools and High Schools. , 2016 .