A Groupware Design Framework for Loosely Coupled Workgroups

Loosely coupled workgroups - where workers are autonomous and weakly interdependent - are common in the real world. They have patterns of work and collaboration that distinguish them from other types of groups, and groupware systems that are designed to support loose coupling must address these differences. However, loosely coupled groups have not been studied in detail in CSCW, and the design process for these groups is currently underspecified. This forces designers to start from scratch each time they develop a system for loosely coupled groups, and they must approach new work settings with little information about how work practices are organized. In this paper, we present a design framework to improve the groupware design process for loosely coupled workgroups. The framework was developed to provide designers with a better understanding of how groupware systems can be designed to support loosely coupled work practices. It is based on information from CSCW and organizational research, and on real-world design experiences with one type of loosely coupled group-- home care treatment teams. The framework was used to develop Mohoc, a groupware system for home care, and the system and underlying framework were evaluated during two field trials.

[1]  Frank W. Lutz,et al.  Tightening up Loose Coupling in Organizations of Higher Education. , 1982 .

[2]  Carl Gutwin,et al.  Designing for loose coupling in mobile groups , 2003, GROUP.

[3]  William Tyler,et al.  ’Loosely Coupled’ Schools: a structuralist critique , 1987 .

[4]  David Pinelle,et al.  Improving groupware design for loosely coupled groups , 2004 .

[5]  T. L. Scheid-Cook,et al.  Ritual Conformity and Organizational Control: Loose Coupling or Professionalization? , 1990 .

[6]  Kerstin Forsberg,et al.  FieldWise: a mobile knowledge management architecture , 2000, CSCW '00.

[7]  Jerry I. Porras,et al.  Groups within organizations : applications of social psychology to organizational behaviour , 1974 .

[8]  A. Pallas,et al.  Research in Sociology of Education and Socialization , 1995 .

[9]  Victoria Bellotti,et al.  Walking away from the desktop computer: distributed collaboration and mobility in a product design team , 1996, CSCW '96.

[10]  William Foster.  Loose Coupling Revisited: A Critical View of Weick's Contribution to Educational Administration. , 1983 .

[11]  K. Weick,et al.  Loosely Coupled Systems: A Reconceptualization , 1990 .

[12]  Arne L. Kalleberg,et al.  Sourcebook of labor markets : evolving structures and processes , 2001 .

[13]  J. E. Groves,et al.  Made in America: Science, Technology and American Modernist Poets , 1989 .

[14]  John L. Kmetz,et al.  An Information-Processing Study of a Complex Workflow in Aircraft Electronics Repair , 1984 .

[15]  Stefano Brusoni,et al.  Managing Knowledge in Loosely Coupled Networks: Exploring the Links between Product and Knowledge Dynamics , 2001 .

[16]  Howard E. Aldrich.  Organizations and Environments , 1979 .

[17]  M. Hitt,et al.  Advanced Manufacturing Technology: Organizational Design and Strategic Flexibility , 1996 .

[18]  James D. Herbsleb,et al.  The geography of coordination: dealing with distance in R&D work , 1999, GROUP.

[19]  Anant R. Negandhi.  Modern organizational theory;: Contextual, environmental, and socio-cultural variables, , 1973 .

[20]  Stephen Horne,et al.  Organisation and Change within Educational Systems: Some Implications of a Loose-coupling Model , 1992 .

[21]  Irene S. Rubin,et al.  RETRENCHMENT, LOOSE STRUCTURE AND ADAPTABILITY IN THE UNIVERSITY* , 1979 .

[22]  Stephanie D. Teasley,et al.  Groupware in the wild: lessons learned from a year of virtual collocation , 1996, CSCW '96.

[23]  J. H. Monane.  A sociology of human systems , 1968 .

[24]  Nancy DiTomaso,et al.  The Loose Coupling of Jobs , 2001 .

[25]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[26]  Talcott Parsons,et al.  Social organization : a general systems and role theory perspective , 1973 .

[27]  Paul R. Mico,et al.  Domain Theory: An Introduction to Oganizational Behavior in Human Service Organizations , 1979 .

[28]  Yeheskel Hasenfeld,et al.  Human Service Organizations. , 1982 .

[29]  William A. Firestone,et al.  The Study of Loose Coupling: Problems, Progress, and Prospects. , 1984 .

[30]  K. Weick.  Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems , 1976, Gestión y Estrategia.

[31]  E. Churchill,et al.  Framing mobile collaborations and mobile technologies , 2001 .

[32]  Paul S. Goodman,et al.  Change in Organizations: New Perspectives on Theory, Research, and Practice. , 1983 .