Partial discharges and noise separation using spectral power ratios and genetic algorithms

Accurate measurements of partial discharge (PD) activity is essential for the application of this technique to condition-based monitoring. Noise and PD source characterization is necessary to fulfil that goal, since the interpretation of classical phase-resolved partial discharge (PRPD) patterns is usually complex for the measurements done in field. A successful pulse source separation prior to the identification seems to be the best option. The authors proposed in a previous work a method based on spectral power ratios (PR) to separate pulse sources with quite good experimental results. This technique calculates the spectral power in two frequency bands to obtain two parameters which, represented in a 2-dimensional map (PR map), characterize each pulse source by a cluster of points. The main difficulty of this technique is the choice of the appropriate frequency intervals that give a good separation of clusters, which sometimes can be cumbersome by manual means. Thus, this paper presents an unsupervised technique to select the two frequency intervals that gives the best separation among several clusters. This will give a great support for the system user to separate PD and noise sources in real measurements. The authors used genetic algorithms (GAs) to select these frequencies, with good results in several real experiments.

[1]  Jian Li,et al.  A hybrid algorithm based on s transform and affinity propagation clustering for separation of two simultaneously artificial partial discharge sources , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation.

[2]  G. Robles,et al.  Partial discharge and noise separation by means of spectral-power clustering techniques , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation.

[3]  G.C. Stone,et al.  Effect of manufacturer, winding age and insulation type on stator winding partial discharge levels , 2004, IEEE Electrical Insulation Magazine.

[4]  G. Robles,et al.  Automatic selection of frequency bands for the power ratios separation technique in partial discharge measurements: part I, fundamentals and noise rejection in simple test objects , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation.

[5]  L. Hao,et al.  Improving detection sensitivity for partial discharge monitoring of high voltage equipment , 2008 .

[6]  Guillermo Robles,et al.  Partial discharge source recognition by means of clustering of spectral power ratios , 2013 .

[7]  J. A. Hunter,et al.  Autonomous classification of PD sources within three-phase 11 kV PILC cables , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation.

[8]  Gian Carlo Montanari,et al.  A new approach to the diagnosis of solid insulation systems based on PD signal inference , 2003 .

[9]  Rui Xu,et al.  Survey of clustering algorithms , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks.

[10]  D. Massart,et al.  The Mahalanobis distance , 2000 .

[11]  F. H. Kreuger,et al.  Partial Discharge Detection in High Voltage Equipment , 1990 .

[12]  C. Hudon,et al.  Partial discharge signal interpretation for generator diagnostics , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation.

[13]  Xiandong Ma,et al.  Interpretation of wavelet analysis and its application in partial discharge detection , 2002 .

[14]  Guillermo Robles,et al.  Partial discharge pulse shape recognition using an inductive loop sensor , 2010 .

[15]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic algorithms and Machine Learning , 1988, Machine Learning.