Evolutionary systems biology: links between gene evolution and function.

The recent accumulation of genome-wide data on various facets of gene expression, function and evolution stimulated the emergence of a new field, evolutionary systems biology. Many significant correlations were detected between variables that characterize the functioning of a gene, such as expression level, knockout effect, connectivity of genetic and protein-protein interaction networks, and variables that describe gene evolution, such as sequence evolution rate and propensity for gene loss. The first attempts on multidimensional analysis of genomic data yielded composite variables that describe the 'status' of a gene in the genomic community. However, it remains uncertain whether different functional variables affect gene evolution synergistically or there is a single, dominant factor. The number of translation events, linked to selection for translational robustness, was proposed as a candidate for such a major determinant of protein evolution. These developments show that, although the methodological basis of evolutionary systems biology is not yet fully solidified, this area of research is already starting to yield fundamental biological insights.

[1]  E. Koonin,et al.  Correlations between Quantitative Measures of Genome Evolution, Expression and Function , 2006 .

[2]  A. E. Hirsh,et al.  Functional genomic analysis of the rates of protein evolution. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  A. E. Hirsh,et al.  Evolutionary Rate in the Protein Interaction Network , 2002, Science.

[4]  T. Ohta,et al.  On some principles governing molecular evolution. , 1974, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  Elizabeth Pennisi.  How Will Big Pictures Emerge From a Sea of Biological Data? , 2005, Science.

[6]  H. Akashi.  Synonymous codon usage in Drosophila melanogaster: natural selection and translational accuracy. , 1994, Genetics.

[7]  Eugene V Koonin,et al.  No simple dependence between protein evolution rate and the number of protein-protein interactions: only the most prolific interactors tend to evolve slowly , 2003, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[8]  Jodie J. Yin,et al.  A comprehensive evolutionary classification of proteins encoded in complete eukaryotic genomes , 2004, Genome Biology.

[9]  Christoph Adami,et al.  Evolutionary rate depends on number of protein-protein interactions independently of gene expression level: Response , 2004, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[10]  Jianzhi Zhang,et al.  Significant impact of protein dispensability on the instantaneous rate of protein evolution. , 2005, Molecular biology and evolution.

[11]  M. Vidal,et al.  Integrating 'omic' information: a bridge between genomics and systems biology. , 2003, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[12]  Dennis P Wall,et al.  Converging on a general model of protein evolution. , 2005, Trends in biotechnology.

[13]  Eugene V Koonin,et al.  Systemic determinants of gene evolution and function , 2005, Molecular systems biology.

[14]  M. Purugganan,et al.  The evolution of molecular genetic pathways and networks , 2004, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[15]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization , 2004, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[16]  Emile Zuckerkandl,et al.  Evolutionary processes and evolutionary noise at the molecular level , 1976, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[17]  C. Adami,et al.  Apparent dependence of protein evolutionary rate on number of interactions is linked to biases in protein–protein interactions data sets , 2003, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[18]  C. Wilke,et al.  A single determinant dominates the rate of yeast protein evolution. , 2006, Molecular biology and evolution.

[19]  Eduardo P C Rocha,et al.  An analysis of determinants of amino acids substitution rates in bacterial proteins. , 2004, Molecular biology and evolution.

[20]  E. Koonin,et al.  Essential genes are more evolutionarily conserved than are nonessential genes in bacteria. , 2002, Genome research.

[21]  Hiroshi Akashi,et al.  Translational selection and yeast proteome evolution. , 2003, Genetics.

[22]  Hunter B. Fraser,et al.  Modularity and evolutionary constraint on proteins , 2005, Nature Genetics.

[23]  Claus O Wilke,et al.  Population Genetics of Translational Robustness , 2005, Genetics.

[24]  D. Vitkup,et al.  Influence of metabolic network structure and function on enzyme evolution , 2006, Genome Biology.

[25]  Liran Carmel,et al.  Unifying measures of gene function and evolution , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[26]  Sui Huang,et al.  Back to the biology in systems biology: what can we learn from biomolecular networks? , 2004, Briefings in functional genomics & proteomics.

[27]  A. E. Hirsh,et al.  Protein dispensability and rate of evolution , 2001, Nature.

[28]  Stéphane Aris-Brosou,et al.  Determinants of adaptive evolution at the molecular level: the extended complexity hypothesis. , 2004, Molecular biology and evolution.

[29]  J. Streelman,et al.  From phenotype to genotype , 2000, Evolution & development.

[30]  Matthew W. Hahn,et al.  Comparative genomics of centrality and essentiality in three eukaryotic protein-interaction networks. , 2005, Molecular biology and evolution.

[31]  C. Wilke,et al.  Why highly expressed proteins evolve slowly. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  D. M. Krylov,et al.  Gene loss, protein sequence divergence, gene dispensability, expression level, and interactivity are correlated in eukaryotic evolution. , 2003, Genome research.

[33]  Dennis P Wall,et al.  A simple dependence between protein evolution rate and the number of protein-protein interactions , 2003, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[34]  C. Pál,et al.  Highly expressed genes in yeast evolve slowly. , 2001, Genetics.

[35]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Lethality and centrality in protein networks , 2001, Nature.

[36]  A. Goldberg,et al.  Protein degradation and protection against misfolded or damaged proteins , 2003, Nature.

[37]  M. Medina.  Genomes, phylogeny, and evolutionary systems biology , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  E. Koonin,et al.  Conservation and coevolution in the scale-free human gene coexpression network. , 2004, Molecular biology and evolution.

[39]  Bernardo Lemos,et al.  Evolution of proteins and gene expression levels are coupled in Drosophila and are independently associated with mRNA abundance, protein length, and number of protein-protein interactions. , 2005, Molecular biology and evolution.

[40]  Laurence D. Hurst,et al.  Genomic function (communication arising): Rate of evolution and gene dispensability , 2003, Nature.

[41]  Lan V. Zhang,et al.  Evidence for dynamically organized modularity in the yeast protein–protein interaction network , 2004, Nature.

[42]  Laurence D. Hurst,et al.  Do essential genes evolve slowly? , 1999, Current Biology.

[43]  Yuri I Wolf,et al.  Coping with the quantitative genomics 'elephant': the correlation between the gene dispensability and evolution rate. , 2006, Trends in genetics : TIG.