Evaluation of a bias correction method applied to downscaled precipitation and temperature reanalysis data for the Rhine basin

Abstract. In many climate impact studies hydrological models are forced with meteorological data without an attempt to assess the quality of these data. The objective of this study was to compare downscaled ERA15 (ECMWF-reanalysis data) precipitation and temperature with observed precipitation and temperature and apply a bias correction to these forcing variables. Precipitation is corrected by fitting it to the mean and coefficient of variation (CV) of the observations. Temperature is corrected by fitting it to the mean and standard deviation of the observations. It appears that the uncorrected ERA15 is too warm and too wet for most of the Rhine basin. The bias correction leads to satisfactory results, precipitation and temperature differences decreased significantly, although there are a few years for which the correction of precipitation is less satisfying. Corrections were largest during summer for both precipitation and temperature. For precipitation alone large corrections were applied during September and October as well. Besides the statistics the correction method was intended to correct for, it is also found to improve the correlations for the fraction of wet days and lag-1 autocorrelations between ERA15 and the observations. For the validation period temperature is corrected very well, but for precipitation the RMSE of the daily difference between modeled and observed precipitation has increased for the corrected situation. When taking random years for calibration, and the remaining years for validation, the spread in the mean bias error (MBE) becomes larger for the corrected precipitation during validation, but the overal average MBE has decreased.

[1]  W. Deursen,et al.  Estimates of future discharges of the river Rhine using two scenario methodologies: direct versus delta approach , 2007 .

[2]  R. Leander,et al.  Resampling of regional climate model output for the simulation of extreme river flows , 2007 .

[3]  M. Clark,et al.  Use of Regional Climate Model Output for Hydrologic Simulations , 2001 .

[4]  Stefan Hagemann,et al.  Gradient in the climate change signal of European discharge predicted by a multi-model ensemble , 2007 .

[5]  P.M.M. Warmerdam,et al.  Impact of climate change on low-flows in the river Meuse , 2007 .

[6]  G. H. Leavesley.  Impacts of Climate Change and Climate Variability on Hydrological Regimes: Overview of models for use in the evaluation of the impacts of climate change on hydrology , 1999 .

[7]  J. Christensen,et al.  On the need for bias correction of regional climate change projections of temperature and precipitation , 2008 .

[8]  J. Kwadijk,et al.  Impact of Climate Change on Hydrological Regimes and Water Resources Management in the Rhine Basin , 2001 .

[9]  Jesper Heile Christensen,et al.  Daily precipitation statistics in regional climate models: Evaluation and intercomparison for the European Alps , 2003 .

[10]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 1994 .

[11]  D. Lettenmaier,et al.  A simple hydrologically based model of land surface water and energy fluxes for general circulation models , 1994 .

[12]  Daniela Jacob,et al.  A note to the simulation of the annual and inter-annual variability of the water budget over the Baltic Sea drainage basin , 2001 .

[13]  T. Brandsma,et al.  Rainfall generator for the Rhine Basin: multi-site generation of weather variables by nearest-neighbour resampling , 1999 .

[14]  C. Piani,et al.  Statistical bias correction for daily precipitation in regional climate models over Europe , 2010 .

[15]  Richard G. Jones,et al.  RCM rainfall for UK flood frequency estimation. I. Method and validation , 2006 .

[16]  Regional climate model simulations as input for hydrological applications: evaluation of uncertainties , 2005 .

[17]  Keith Beven,et al.  Changing ideas in hydrology — The case of physically-based models , 1989 .

[18]  Richard G. Jones,et al.  RCM rainfall for UK flood frequency estimation. II. Climate change results , 2006 .

[19]  Christoph Schär,et al.  Hydrologic simulations in the Rhine basin driven by a regional climate model , 2005 .

[20]  Richard W. Katz,et al.  Improving the simulation of extreme precipitation events by stochastic weather generators , 2008 .

[21]  S. Steele‐Dunne,et al.  The impacts of climate change on hydrology in Ireland , 2008 .

[22]  C. Simmer,et al.  Analysis of extreme precipitation over Europe from different reanalyses: a comparative assessment , 2004 .

[23]  W. P. A. van Deursen,et al.  Assessing future discharge of the river Rhine using regional climate model integrations and a hydrological model , 2003 .

[24]  S. Hagemann,et al.  Validation of precipitation from ERA40 and an ECHAM4.5 simulation nudged with ERA40 data , 1994 .

[25]  J. Aldrich.  R.A. Fisher and the making of maximum likelihood 1912-1922 , 1997 .

[26]  Göran Lindström,et al.  Development and test of the distributed HBV-96 hydrological model , 1997 .

[27]  J. Aerts,et al.  Water balance versus land surface model in the simulation of Rhine river discharges , 2008 .

[28]  A. Weerts,et al.  Discharge simulations performed with a hydrological model using bias corrected regional climate model input , 2009 .

[29]  S. Bergström,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF A CONCEPTUAL DETERMINISTIC RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODEL , 1973 .

[30]  M. Déqué,et al.  Frequency of precipitation and temperature extremes over France in an anthropogenic scenario: Model results and statistical correction according to observed values , 2007 .

[31]  Remko Uijlenhoet,et al.  Changes in Streamflow Dynamics in the Rhine Basin under Three High-Resolution Regional Climate Scenarios , 2010 .