Validation of an echocardiographic multiparametric strategy to increase responders patients after cardiac resynchronization: a multicentre study.

AIMS We sought to develop and validate a multiparametric algorithm by applying previously validated criteria to predict cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) response in a multicentre study. Thirty per cent of patients treated by CRT fail to respond to the treatment. Although dyssynchrony by echocardiography has been used to improve the selection of patients, the complexity of myocardial contraction has generated a moderate improvement using any of several individual parameters. METHODS AND RESULTS Two hundred end-stage heart failure patients [NYHA 3-4 and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)<35%] with QRS>120 ms were included. Echocardiography analysis focused on the following parameters: atrioventricular dyssynchrony, interventricular dyssynchrony, and intraventricular dyssynchrony that integrated radial (PSAX M-mode) and longitudinal [tissue Doppler imaging (TDI)] evaluations for spatial (wall to wall) and temporal (wall end-systole to mitral valve opening) dyssynchrony diagnosis. Following CRT implantation, patients were monitored for 6 months with functional and echo evaluations defining responders by a 15% reduction in end-systolic volume. Mean QRS duration and LVEF were 152 +/- 17 ms and 25 +/- 8%. There was a CRT response in 57% of patients, independent of QRS width. Mean prevalence of positive criteria was 34 +/- 8%. Feasibility and variability averages were 81 +/- 20% and 9 +/- 4%. In a single parametric approach, ranges of sensitivities and specificities were 18-65% and 45-84% with a mean of 41% and 66%. A multiparametric approach by focusing on criteria combination decreased the mean rate of false-positive results to 14 +/- 12%, 5 +/- 4%, 2 +/- 2%, and 1 +/- 2% from one to four parameters, respectively. More than three parameters were associated with a specificity above 90% and a positive predictive value above 65%. Reproducibility of this global strategy was 91%. CONCLUSION A multiparametric echocardiographic strategy based on the association of conventional criteria is a better indicator of CRT response than the existing single parametric approaches.

[1]  J. Barthélémy,et al.  Prospective validation of stress echocardiography as an identifier of cardiac resynchronization therapy responders. , 2006, Heart rhythm.

[2]  A. Hoes,et al.  Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic heart failure: executive summary (update 2005): The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Heart Failure of the European Society of Cardiology. , 2005, European heart journal.

[3]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Assessment of left ventricular dyssynchrony by speckle tracking strain imaging comparison between longitudinal, circumferential, and radial strain in cardiac resynchronization therapy. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Left ventricular dyssynchrony predicts response and prognosis after cardiac resynchronization therapy. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  Christophe Leclercq,et al.  Predictors of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (PROSPECT)--study design. , 2005, American heart journal.

[6]  D. Delurgio,et al.  Effect of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy on Left Ventricular Size and Function in Chronic Heart Failure , 2003, Circulation.

[7]  P. Mitkowski,et al.  Effect of Restoration of AV Synchrony on Stroke Volume, Exercise Capacity, and Quality‐of‐Life: Can We Predict the Beneficial Effect of a Pacemaker Upgrade? , 2001, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[8]  G. Baumann,et al.  Influence of the atrio-ventricular delay optimization on the intra left ventricular delay in cardiac resynchronization therapy , 2006, Cardiovascular ultrasound.

[9]  Anna Strömberg,et al.  ESC GUIDELINES FOR THE DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF ACUTE AND CHRONIC HEART FAILURE 2008 (ENDING) , 2009 .

[10]  L. A. Bonet,et al.  ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2012 , 2010, European journal of heart failure.

[11]  J. Seward,et al.  Apex-to-base dispersion in regional timing of left ventricular shortening and lengthening. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  Milton Packer,et al.  Cardiac resynchronization in chronic heart failure. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  Marek Belohlavek,et al.  Left ventricular structure and function: basic science for cardiac imaging. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  J. Daubert,et al.  The effect of cardiac resynchronization on morbidity and mortality in heart failure. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  S. Simonini,et al.  Beneficial Effects of Biventricular Pacing in Patients with a “Narrow” QRS , 2003, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[16]  A. DeMaria,et al.  Dynamic ventricular dyssynchrony: an exercise-echocardiography study. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[17]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Myocardial contractile reserve predicts improvement in left ventricular function after cardiac resynchronization therapy. , 2007, American heart journal.

[18]  A. Lazarus,et al.  Echocardiographic Modeling of Cardiac Dyssynchrony Before and During Multisite Stimulation: A Prospective Study , 2003, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[19]  Perry M. Elliott,et al.  ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2012 , 2010, European journal of heart failure.

[20]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Postero‐Lateral Scar Tissue Resulting in Non‐Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy , 2006, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[21]  W. Braham,et al.  Cardiac Resynchronization in Chronic Heart Failure , 2002 .

[22]  Thomas Lavergne,et al.  Effects of multisite biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure and intraventricular conduction delay , 2001 .

[23]  Pedro Brugada,et al.  Improvement of Left Ventricular Function After Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Is Predicted by Tissue Doppler Imaging Echocardiography , 2004, Circulation.

[24]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Combined longitudinal and radial dyssynchrony predicts ventricular response after resynchronization therapy. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[25]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Optimal left ventricular lead position predicts reverse remodeling and survival after cardiac resynchronization therapy. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[26]  Randolph P. Martin,et al.  Usefulness of the peak velocity difference by tissue Doppler imaging technique as an effective predictor of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. , 2004, The American journal of cardiology.

[27]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Results of the Predictors of Response to CRT (PROSPECT) Trial , 2008, Circulation.

[28]  J. Gorcsan Role of echocardiography to determine candidacy for cardiac resynchronization therapy , 2008, Current opinion in cardiology.

[29]  C. H. Chen,et al.  Improved left ventricular mechanics from acute VDD pacing in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and ventricular conduction delay. , 1999, Circulation.

[30]  Paolo Rizzon,et al.  Clinical Application of Echocardiographic Findings Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Tailored by Echocardiographic Evaluation of Ventricular Asynchrony , 2016 .

[31]  K. Serri,et al.  Echocardiographic Algorithm for Cardiac Resynchronization , 2008, Echocardiography.

[32]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Frequency of left ventricular dyssynchrony in patients with heart failure and a narrow QRS complex. , 2005, The American journal of cardiology.

[33]  Thomas Lavergne,et al.  Long-term benefits of biventricular pacing in congestive heart failure: results from the MUltisite STimulation in cardiomyopathy (MUSTIC) study. , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.