SimWIND: A geospatial infrastructure model for optimizing wind power generation and transmission

Wind is a clean, enduring energy resource with the capacity to satisfy 20% or more of U.S. electricity demand. Presently, wind potential is limited by a paucity of electrical transmission lines and/or capacity between promising wind resources and primary load centers. We present the model SimWIND to address this shortfall. SimWIND is an integrated optimization model for the geospatial arrangement and cost minimization of wind-power generation–transmission–delivery infrastructure. Given a set of possible wind-farm sites, the model simultaneously determines (1) where and how much power to generate and (2) where to build new transmission infrastructure and with what capacity in order to minimize the cost for delivering a targeted amount of power to load. Costs and routing of transmission lines consider geographic and social constraints as well as electricity losses. We apply our model to the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) Interconnection, considering scenarios that deliver up to 20GW of new wind power. We show that SimWIND could potentially reduce ERCOT's projected ∼$5B transmission network upgrade line length and associated costs by 50%. These results suggest that SimWIND's coupled generation–transmission–delivery modeling approach could play a critical role in enhancing planning efforts and reducing costs for wind energy integration.

[1]  Charles McKeown,et al.  On developing a prospecting tool for wind industry and policy decision support , 2011 .

[2]  Richard S. Middleton,et al.  A scalable infrastructure model for carbon capture and storage: SimCCS , 2009 .

[3]  G. C. Bakos,et al.  A new energy planning methodology for the penetration of renewable energy technologies in electricity sector—application for the island of Crete , 2006 .

[4]  D. Osborn,et al.  The view from the top , 2009, IEEE Power and Energy Magazine.

[5]  Jay Apt,et al.  Implications of generator siting for CO2 pipeline infrastructure , 2008 .

[6]  Alain Nadaï,et al.  “Planning”, “siting” and the local acceptance of wind power: Some lessons from the French case , 2007 .

[7]  Amol Phadke,et al.  Exploration of Resource and Transmission Expansion Decisions in the Western Renewable Energy Zone Initiative , 2011 .

[8]  Rajesh J. Pawar,et al.  Jumpstarting CCS using refinery CO2 for enhanced oil recovery , 2011 .

[9]  Richard S. Middleton,et al.  Generating candidate networks for optimization: The CO2 capture and storage optimization problem , 2012, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[10]  Shashank Mohan,et al.  National electricity planning in settings with low pre-existing grid coverage: Development of a spatial model and case study of Kenya , 2009 .

[11]  Erik Ela,et al.  ERCOT Event on February 26, 2008: Lessons Learned , 2008 .

[12]  Rajesh J. Pawar,et al.  A dynamic model for optimally phasing in CO2 capture and storage infrastructure , 2012, Environ. Model. Softw..

[13]  Hari S Viswanathan,et al.  Mesoscale carbon sequestration site screening and CCS infrastructure analysis. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[14]  W. Short,et al.  Evaluating a Proposed 20% National Renewable Portfolio Standard , 2009 .

[15]  Richard S. Middleton,et al.  Optimal Spatial Deployment of CO2 Capture and Storage Given a Price on Carbon , 2011 .

[16]  G. Cornelis van Kooten,et al.  Network constrained wind integration on Vancouver Island , 2008 .

[17]  W. Kempton,et al.  Public opinion about large offshore wind power: Underlying factors , 2007 .

[18]  R. Meentemeyer,et al.  A geographic analysis of wind turbine placement in Northern California , 2006 .

[19]  K. Porter,et al.  The Cost of Transmission for Wind Energy: A Review of Transmission Planning Studies , 2009 .

[20]  Gabriel Kwok,et al.  Costs and Emissions Reductions from the Competitive Renewable Energy Zones (CREZ) Wind Transmission Project in Texas , 2011 .

[21]  Michael Hutson,et al.  Considerations on the use of HVDC for CREZ transmission , 2009, 2009 IEEE/PES Power Systems Conference and Exposition.

[22]  J. Kabouris,et al.  Decision support tool to evaluate alternative policies regulating wind integration into autonomous energy systems , 2005 .

[23]  Kara Clark,et al.  How do Wind and Solar Power Affect Grid Operations: The Western Wind and Solar Integration Study; Preprint , 2009 .

[24]  Robert Gross,et al.  Winds of change: How high wind penetrations will affect investment incentives in the GB electricity sector , 2011 .

[25]  J. A. Kavicky,et al.  The Design, Construction, and Operation of Long-Distance High-Voltage Electricity Transmission Technologies. , 2008 .

[26]  Joseph F. DeCarolis,et al.  The economics of large-scale wind power in a carbon constrained world , 2006 .