Mesoscale modeling of Central American smoke transport to the United States: 1. “Top‐down” assessment of emission strength and diurnal variation impacts

[1] As is typical in the Northern Hemisphere spring, during 20 April to 21 May 2003, significant biomass burning smoke from Central America was transported to the southeastern United States (SEUS). A coupled aerosol, radiation, and meteorology model that is built upon the heritage of the Regional Atmospheric Modeling System (RAMS), having newly developed capabilities of Assimilation and Radiation Online Modeling of Aerosols (AROMA) algorithm, was used to simulate the smoke transport and quantify the smoke radiative impacts on surface energetics, boundary layer, and other atmospheric processes. This paper, the first of a two-part series, describes the model and examines the ability of RAMS-AROMA to simulate the smoke transport. Because biomass-burning fire activities have distinct diurnal variations, the FLAMBE hourly smoke emission inventory that is derived from the geostationary satellite (GOES) fire products was assimilated into the model. In the “top-down” analysis, ground-based observations were used to evaluate the model performance, and the comparisons with model-simulated results were used to estimate emission uncertainties. Qualitatively, a 30-day simulation of smoke spatial distribution as well as the timing and location of the smoke fronts are consistent with those identified from the PM2.5 observation network, local air quality reports, and the measurements of aerosol optical thickness (AOT) and aerosol vertical profiles from the Southern Great Plains (SGP) Atmospheric Radiation Measurements (ARM) site in Oklahoma. Quantitatively, the model-simulated daily mean near-surface dry smoke mass correlates well with PM2.5 mass at 34 locations in Texas and with the total carbon mass and nonsoil potassium mass (KNON) at three IMPROVE sites along the smoke pathway (with linear correlation coefficients R = 0.77, 0.74, and 0.69 at the significance level larger than 0.99, respectively). The top-down sensitivity analysis indicates that the total smoke particle emission during the study period is about 1.3 ± 0.2 Tg. The results further indicate that the simulation with a daily smoke emission inventory provides a slightly better correlation with measurements in the downwind region on daily scales but gives an unrealistic diurnal variation of AOT in the smoke source region. This study suggests that the assimilation of emission inventories from geostationary satellites is superior to that of polar orbiting satellites and has important implications for the modeling of air quality in areas influenced by fire-related pollutants from distant sources.

[1]  M. Jacobson,et al.  Strong radiative heating due to the mixing state of black carbon in atmospheric aerosols , 2022 .

[2]  W. Malm,et al.  Spatial and seasonal trends in particle concentration and optical extinction in the United States , 1994 .

[3]  J. Kauffman,et al.  Biomass dynamics associated with deforestation, fire, and, conversion to cattle pasture in a Mexican tropical dry forest , 2003 .

[4]  Erik Swietlicki,et al.  Organic aerosol and global climate modelling: a review , 2004 .

[5]  R. Ferrare,et al.  In situ aerosol profiles over the Southern Great Plains cloud and radiation test bed site: 1. Aerosol optical properties , 2004 .

[6]  M. Noguer,et al.  Climate change 2001: The scientific basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2002 .

[7]  R. Stull.  An Introduction to Boundary Layer Meteorology , 1988 .

[8]  R. Pielke,et al.  A comprehensive meteorological modeling system—RAMS , 1992 .

[9]  Sundar A. Christopher,et al.  GOES 8 aerosol optical thickness assimilation in a mesoscale model: Online integration of aerosol radiative effects , 2004 .

[10]  S. Twomey.  The Influence of Pollution on the Shortwave Albedo of Clouds , 1977 .

[11]  G. Carmichael,et al.  Regional chemical weather forecasting system CFORS: Model descriptions and analysis of surface observations at Japanese island stations during the ACE‐Asia experiment , 2003 .

[12]  R. Reynolds,et al.  The NCEP/NCAR 40-Year Reanalysis Project , 1996, Renewable Energy.

[13]  Leiming Zhang,et al.  A size-segregated particle dry deposition scheme for an atmospheric aerosol module , 2001 .

[14]  Christian Seigneur,et al.  Uncertainties in modeling secondary organic aerosols: three-dimensional modeling studies in Nashville/western Tennessee. , 2003, Environmental science & technology.

[15]  D. Allen,et al.  Seasonal and spatial trends in primary and secondary organic carbon concentrations in southeast Texas , 2004 .

[16]  Teruyuki Nakajima,et al.  Tropospheric aerosol optical thickness from the GOCART model and comparisons with satellite and sun photometer measurements , 2002 .

[17]  J. Klett,et al.  Microphysics of Clouds and Precipitation , 1978, Nature.

[18]  T. Kirchstetter,et al.  Water-soluble Organic Components in Aerosols Associated with Savanna Fires in Southern Africa: Identification, Evolution and Distribution , 2003 .

[19]  V. Ramanathan,et al.  Reduction of tropical cloudiness by soot , 2000, Science.

[20]  Judith C. Chow,et al.  The dri thermal/optical reflectance carbon analysis system: description, evaluation and applications in U.S. Air quality studies , 1993 .

[21]  G. Mellor,et al.  A Hierarchy of Turbulence Closure Models for Planetary Boundary Layers. , 1974 .

[22]  A. Robock.  Enhancement of Surface Cooling Due to Forest Fire Smoke , 1988, Science.

[23]  D. Blake,et al.  Physical, chemical, and optical properties of regional hazes dominated by smoke in Brazil , 1998 .

[24]  D. Byun.  Science algorithms of the EPA Models-3 community multi-scale air quality (CMAQ) modeling system , 1999 .

[25]  Barbara J. Turpin,et al.  Species Contributions to PM2.5 Mass Concentrations: Revisiting Common Assumptions for Estimating Organic Mass , 2001 .

[26]  Thomas F. Eck,et al.  Variability of biomass burning aerosol optical characteristics in southern Africa during the SAFARI , 2003 .

[27]  Sundar A. Christopher,et al.  Real‐time monitoring of South American smoke particle emissions and transport using a coupled remote sensing/box‐model approach , 2004 .

[28]  J. Penner,et al.  Global estimates of biomass burning emissions based on satellite imagery for the year 2000 , 2004 .

[29]  R. Ferrare,et al.  Raman LIDAR Measurements of Aerosols and Water Vapor Over the Southern Great Plains , 2004 .

[30]  Ulla Wandinger,et al.  Transport of boreal forest fire emissions from Canada , 2001 .

[31]  P. Bhave,et al.  Primary and secondary organic aerosols over the United States: estimates on the basis of observed organic carbon (OC) and elemental carbon (EC), and air quality modeled primary OC/EC ratios , 2004 .

[32]  J. Reid,et al.  Physical and optical properties of young smoke from individual biomass fires in Brazil , 1998 .

[33]  R. Turco,et al.  Particle size distributions in an expanding plume undergoing simultaneous coagulation and condensation , 1999 .

[34]  O. Boucher,et al.  A satellite view of aerosols in the climate system , 2002, Nature.

[35]  J. Seinfeld,et al.  Development and application of the Model of Aerosol Dynamics, Reaction, Ionization, and Dissolution (MADRID) , 2004 .

[36]  C. Justice,et al.  Global and Regional Vegetation Fire Monitoring from Space: Planning a Coordinated International Effort , 2001 .

[37]  L. Brasseur,et al.  Raman lidar measurements of the aerosol extinction‐to‐backscatter ratio over the Southern Great Plains , 2001 .

[38]  P. Crutzen,et al.  Biomass Burning in the Tropics: Impact on Atmospheric Chemistry and Biogeochemical Cycles , 1990, Science.

[39]  F. Lurmann,et al.  Evaluation of the TEOM method for measurement of ambient particulate mass in urban areas. , 1997, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[40]  W. Slinn,et al.  Predictions for particle deposition on natural waters , 1980 .

[41]  G. Grell,et al.  A description of the fifth-generation Penn State/NCAR Mesoscale Model (MM5) , 1994 .

[42]  Mian Chin,et al.  Contribution of different aerosol species to the global aerosol extinction optical thickness: Estimates from model results , 1997 .

[43]  Lorraine A. Remer,et al.  ARM Southern Great Plains Site Observations of the Smoke Pall Associated with the 1998 Central American Fires , 2000 .

[44]  T. Berntsen,et al.  Modeling the solar radiative impact of aerosols from biomass burning during the Southern African Regional Science Initiative (SAFARI-2000) experiment , 2003 .

[45]  U. Lohmann,et al.  Optical and meteorological properties of smoke‐dominated haze at the ARM Southern Great Plains Central Facility , 2003 .

[46]  Judith C. Chow,et al.  Guidance for using continuous monitors in PM2.5 monitoring networks , 1998 .

[47]  I. J. Ackermann,et al.  Modeling the formation of secondary organic aerosol within a comprehensive air quality model system , 2001 .

[48]  S. Christopher,et al.  Daytime Variation of Shortwave Direct Radiative Forcing of Biomass Burning Aerosols from GOES-8 Imager , 2002 .

[49]  Roger A. Pielke,et al.  Coupled Atmosphere–Biophysics–Hydrology Models for Environmental Modeling , 2000 .

[50]  J. Harrington,et al.  A method for the parameterization of cloud optical properties in bulk and bin microphysical models. Implications for arctic cloudy boundary layers , 2001 .

[51]  A. Waple,et al.  State of the Climate in 2003 , 2004 .

[52]  W. Cotton,et al.  New RAMS cloud microphysics parameterization part I: the single-moment scheme , 1995 .

[53]  Christine A. O'Neill,et al.  Effects of Aerosol from Biomass Burning on the Global Radiation Budget , 1992, Science.

[54]  Wei Min Hao,et al.  Spatial and temporal distribution of tropical biomass burning , 1994 .

[55]  Ilan Koren,et al.  Measurement of the Effect of Amazon Smoke on Inhibition of Cloud Formation , 2004, Science.

[56]  M. Jacobson.  Development and application of a new air pollution modeling system—II. Aerosol module structure and design , 1997 .

[57]  Peter V. Hobbs,et al.  Humidification factors of aerosols from biomass burning in Brazil , 1998 .

[58]  S. Pandis,et al.  Evaluation of secondary organic aerosol formation in winter , 1999 .

[59]  E. Atlas,et al.  Effect of petrochemical industrial emissions of reactive alkenes and NOx on tropospheric ozone formation in Houston, Texas , 2003 .

[60]  Daniel J. Jacob,et al.  Biomass burning emission inventory with daily resolution: Application to aircraft observations of Asian outflow , 2003 .

[61]  G. Carmichael,et al.  Evaluating regional emission estimates using the TRACE‐P observations , 2003 .

[62]  E. Prins,et al.  An overview of GOES‐8 diurnal fire and smoke results for SCAR‐B and 1995 fire season in South America , 1998 .

[63]  Kenneth P. Bowman,et al.  Transport of smoke from the Central American fires of 1998 , 2001 .

[64]  D. Allen.  Gulf Coast Aerosol Research and Characterization Program (Houston Supersite) , 2001 .

[65]  Alexander Smirnov,et al.  How well do State-of-the-Art Techniques Measuring the Vertical Profile of Tropospheric Aerosol Extinction Compare? , 2006 .

[66]  Owen B. Toon,et al.  Simulations of microphysical, radiative, and dynamical processes in a continental-scale forest fire smoke plume , 1991 .

[67]  J. Goldammer,et al.  Modeling of carbonaceous particles emitted by boreal and temperate wildfires at northern latitudes , 2000 .

[68]  Timo Mäkelä,et al.  Intercomparison of methods to measure the mass concentration of the atmospheric aerosol during INTERCOMP2000: influence of instrumentation and size cuts , 2004 .

[69]  William C. Malm,et al.  Spatial and monthly trends in speciated fine particle concentration in the United States , 2004 .

[70]  Kathy Jones,et al.  Impact of the 1998 Central American fires on PM2.5 mass and composition in the southeastern United States , 2001 .

[71]  P. Pilewskie,et al.  Evolution of gases and particles from a savanna fire in South Africa , 2003 .

[72]  L. Remer,et al.  Smoke aerosol from biomass burning in Mexico: Hygroscopic smoke optical model , 2001 .

[73]  P. Crutzen,et al.  Biomass burning as a source of atmospheric gases , 1979 .

[74]  Thomas Trautmann,et al.  Simulation of a biomass-burning plume: Comparison of model results with observations , 2002 .

[75]  Roy M. Harrison,et al.  Quantitative interpretation of divergence between PM10 and PM2.5 mass measurement by TEOM and gravimetric (Partisol) instruments , 2004 .

[76]  D. Blake,et al.  Emission factors of hydrocarbons, halocarbons, trace gases and particles from biomass burning in Brazil , 1998 .

[77]  Q. Fu,et al.  Parameterization of the Radiative Properties of Cirrus Clouds , 1993 .

[78]  Beat Schmid,et al.  Evaluation of daytime measurements of aerosols and water vapor made by an operational Raman lidar over the Southern Great Plains , 2006 .

[79]  Mark R. Schoeberl,et al.  Transport of smoke from Canadian forest fires to the surface near Washington, D.C.: Injection height, entrainment, and optical properties , 2004 .

[80]  J. Penner,et al.  A global three‐dimensional model study of carbonaceous aerosols , 1996 .

[81]  T. Eck,et al.  A review of biomass burning emissions part III: intensive optical properties of biomass burning particles , 2004 .

[82]  R. Colvile,et al.  Estimating the direct radiative forcing due to haze from the 1997 forest fires in Indonesia , 2004 .

[83]  Mian Chin,et al.  Sources of carbonaceous aerosols over the United States and implications for natural visibility , 2003 .

[84]  J. Chow,et al.  Results of the "Carbon Conference" International Aerosol Carbon Round Robin Test Stage I , 2001 .

[85]  Sundar A. Christopher,et al.  Use of the Ångstrom exponent to estimate the variability of optical and physical properties of aging smoke particles in Brazil , 1999 .

[86]  Barbara J. Turpin,et al.  Measuring and simulating particulate organics in the atmosphere: problems and prospects , 2000 .