Learning the aircraft mass and thrust to improve the ground-based trajectory prediction of climbing flights

Ground-based aircraft trajectory prediction is a major concern in air traffic control and management. A safe and efficient prediction is a prerequisite to the implementation of automated tools that detect and solve conflicts between trajectories. This paper focuses on the climb phase, because predictions are much less accurate in this phase than in the cruising phase. Trajectory prediction usually relies on a point-mass model of the forces acting on the aircraft to predict the successive points of the future trajectory. The longitudinal acceleration and climb rate are determined by an equation relating the modeled power of the forces to the kinetic and potential energy rate. Using such a model requires knowledge of the aircraft state (mass, current thrust setting, position, velocity, etc.), atmospheric conditions (wind, temperature) and aircraft intent (thrust law, speed intent). Most of this information is not available to ground-based systems. In this paper, we improve the trajectory prediction accuracy by learning some of the unknown point-mass model parameters from past observations. These unknown parameters, mass and thrust, are adjusted by fitting the modeled specific power to the observed energy rate. The thrust law is learned from historical data, and the mass is estimated on past trajectory points. The adjusted parameters are not meant to be exact, however they are designed so as to improve the energy rate prediction. The performances of the proposed method are compared with the results of standard model-based methods relying on the Eurocontrol Base of Aircraft DAta (BADA), using two months of radar track records and weather data.

[1]  Vicenç Puig,et al.  Multi-objective optimisation for aircraft departure trajectories minimising noise annoyance , 2010 .

[2]  Pierre Savéant,et al.  Online Learning for Ground Trajectory Prediction , 2012, ArXiv.

[3]  Технология Springer Science+Business Media , 2013 .

[4]  Michael Schultz,et al.  Enhanced jet performance model for high precision 4D flight path prediction , 2011, ATACCS.

[5]  Nicolas Durand,et al.  Automatic aircraft conflict resolution using genetic algorithms , 1996, SAC '96.

[6]  A. Nuic,et al.  Advanced Aircraft Performance Modeling for ATM: Enhancements to the Bada Model , 2005, 24th Digital Avionics Systems Conference.

[7]  Philippe Averty,et al.  ERASMUS Strategic Deconfliction to Benefit SESAR , 2009 .

[8]  Yiyuan Zhao,et al.  Trajectory Synthesis for Air Traffic Automation , 1997 .

[9]  Stephen J. Wright,et al.  Numerical Optimization (Springer Series in Operations Research and Financial Engineering) , 2000 .

[10]  Nicolas Durand,et al.  Ground-based estimation of the aircraft mass, adaptive vs. least squares method , 2013 .

[11]  John Lygeros,et al.  Model Based Aircraft Trajectory Prediction during Takeoff , 2006 .

[12]  D K Smith,et al.  Numerical Optimization , 2001, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[13]  G. L. Slater Adaptive improvement of aircraft climb performance for air traffic control applications , 2002, Proceedings of the IEEE Internatinal Symposium on Intelligent Control.

[14]  M. Iagaru,et al.  Advanced Aircraft Performance Modeling for ATM: BADA 4.0 Results , 2006, 2006 ieee/aiaa 25TH Digital Avionics Systems Conference.

[15]  John Lygeros,et al.  A simulation based study of subliminal control for air traffic management , 2010 .

[16]  A. W. Warren,et al.  Vertical path trajectory prediction for next generation ATM , 1998, 17th DASC. AIAA/IEEE/SAE. Digital Avionics Systems Conference. Proceedings (Cat. No.98CH36267).

[17]  Nicolas Durand,et al.  Energy rate prediction using an equivalent thrust setting profile , 2012 .

[18]  Heinz Erzberger,et al.  Adaptive Trajectory Prediction Algorithm for Climbing Flights , 2012 .

[19]  Vincent Mouillet,et al.  Advanced aircraft performance modeling for ATM: Analysis of BADA model capabilities , 2010, 29th Digital Avionics Systems Conference.