In Vivo MRI Based Prostate Cancer Identification with Random Forests and Auto-context Model

Prostate cancer is one of the major causes of cancer death for men. Magnetic Resonance (MR) image is being increasingly used as an important modality to detect prostate cancer. Therefore, identifying prostate cancer in MRI with automated detection methods has become an active area of research, and many methods have been proposed to identify the prostate cancer. However, most of previous methods only focused on identifying cancer in the peripheral zone, or classifying suspicious cancer ROIs into benign tissue and cancer tissue. In this paper, we propose a novel learning-based multi-source integration framework to directly identify the prostate cancer regions from in vivo MRI. We employ the random forest technique to effectively integrate features from multi-source images together for cancer segmentation. Here, the multi-source images include initially only the multi-parametric MRIs (T2, DWI, eADC and dADC) and later also the iteratively estimated and refined tissue probability map of prostate cancer. Experimental results on 26 real patient data show that our method can accurately identify the cancerous tissue.

[1]  B. G. Blijenberg,et al.  Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Computer-Aided Detection of Prostate Cancer in MRI , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[3]  Thomas Hambrock,et al.  Prospective assessment of prostate cancer aggressiveness using 3-T diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging-guided biopsies versus a systematic 10-core transrectal ultrasound prostate biopsy cohort. , 2012, European urology.

[4]  Paul A. Viola,et al.  Robust Real-Time Face Detection , 2001, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[5]  Guillermo Sapiro,et al.  Sparse Representation for Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , 2010, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[6]  Yoav Freund,et al.  A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting , 1997, EuroCOLT.

[7]  Bruce Fischl,et al.  Accurate and robust brain image alignment using boundary-based registration , 2009, NeuroImage.

[8]  Hong Cheng,et al.  Sparsity induced similarity measure for label propagation , 2009, 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision.

[9]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[10]  Zhuowen Tu,et al.  Auto-Context and Its Application to High-Level Vision Tasks and 3D Brain Image Segmentation , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[11]  Yongyi Yang,et al.  Supervised and unsupervised methods for prostate cancer segmentation with multispectral MRI. , 2010, Medical physics.

[12]  Thomas Hambrock,et al.  Prostate cancer: multiparametric MR imaging for detection, localization, and staging. , 2011, Radiology.

[13]  Xiao Han Learning-Boosted Label Fusion for Multi-atlas Auto-Segmentation , 2013, MLMI.

[14]  Bram van Ginneken,et al.  Segmentation of the posterior ribs in chest radiographs using iterated contextual pixel classification , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[15]  Mario Marengo,et al.  Detection and localization of prostate cancer: correlation of (11)C-choline PET/CT with histopathologic step-section analysis. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[16]  Carole Lartizien,et al.  Computer-aided diagnosis of prostate cancer in the peripheral zone using multiparametric MRI , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  Ben Glocker,et al.  Atlas Encoding by Randomized Forests for Efficient Label Propagation , 2013, MICCAI.

[18]  Joel P. Christensen,et al.  Homeric Space , 2012, The Classical Review.

[19]  Kyung Ah Kim,et al.  Prostate cancer: apparent diffusion coefficient map with T2-weighted images for detection--a multireader study. , 2009, Radiology.

[20]  M. Giger,et al.  Quantitative analysis of multiparametric prostate MR images: differentiation between prostate cancer and normal tissue and correlation with Gleason score--a computer-aided diagnosis development study. , 2013, Radiology.