Selecting prototypes for two multicriteria classification methods: A comparative study

In the last years, the area of Multicriteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) has brought about new methods to cope with classification problems, among which those based on the concept of prototypes. These refer to specific alternatives (samples) of the training dataset that are good representatives of the groups they fit in. In this paper, experiments are conducted over two prototype selection (PS) techniques employed to improve the accuracy of two prototype-based MCDA classification methods. The PS techiques investigated are based, respectively, on a customized genetic algorithm and on the Electre IV approach, whereas the MCDA classification methods studied comprise the one proposed by Goletsis et al. and the well-known PROAFTN method. The results achieved demonstrate that the classification methods are indeed very sensitive to the choice of prototypes and that the PS techniques investigated may be instrumental for leveraging their performance levels.

[1]  Patrice Perny,et al.  Multicriteria filtering methods based onconcordance and non-discordance principles , 1998, Ann. Oper. Res..

[2]  Yorgos Goletsis,et al.  Automated ischemic beat classification using genetic algorithms and multicriteria decision analysis , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  David G. Stork,et al.  Pattern Classification , 1973 .

[4]  Iryna Yevseyeva Solving classification problems with multicriteria decision aiding approaches , 2007 .

[5]  A. E. Eiben,et al.  Introduction to Evolutionary Computing , 2003, Natural Computing Series.

[6]  Constantin Zopounidis,et al.  Multicriteria classification and sorting methods: A literature review , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[7]  Nabil Belacel,et al.  Multicriteria assignment method PROAFTN: Methodology and medical application , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[8]  Bernard Roy,et al.  Classement et choix en présence de points de vue multiples , 1968 .

[9]  Constantin Zopounidis,et al.  Multicriteria Decision Aid Classification Methods , 2002 .

[10]  World Congress on Nature & Biologically Inspired Computing, NaBIC 2009, 9-11 December 2009, Coimbatore, India , 2009, NaBIC.

[11]  Plácido Rogério Pinheiro,et al.  Towards the Early Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease via a Multicriteria Classification Model , 2009, EMO.

[12]  Oleg I. Larichev,et al.  Verbal Decision Analysis for Unstructured Problems , 1997 .

[13]  Plácido Rogério Pinheiro,et al.  Comparison of Two MCDA Classification Methods over the Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease , 2009, RSKT.

[14]  Salvatore Greco,et al.  Multi-criteria classification - A new scheme for application of dominance-based decision rules , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[15]  Abraham P. Punnen,et al.  Learning multicriteria fuzzy classification method PROAFTN from data , 2007, Comput. Oper. Res..