Accounting , Auditing & Accountability Journal Agroecology accounting : biodiversity and sustainable livelihoods from the margins

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to provide a socio-ecological counter account of the role that agroecology plays in supporting the sustainable livelihoods of a co-operative of smallholder coffee farmers, where very little value is created at their end of the coffee commodity chain. Agroecology may be defined as the science that provides the ecological principles and concepts for the design and management of productive agricultural ecosystems that conserve natural resources. Design/methodology/approach – This study uses a case study design of a coffee-producing co-operative in India using data collected from participant observation, focus groups and unstructured interviews with indigenous smallholder farmers. It combines the science of agroecology with the labour theory of value as a theoretical framework. Findings – An agroecological approach supports agricultural biodiversity, while promoting sustainable livelihoods since members of the co-operative are able to reduce their use of external inputs. However, an agroecological transformation is curtailed by the continued dependence on corporate value chains. A framework using the labour theory of value is used to explain the extraction of surplus value from the labour of both the smallholder farmers as well as nature. This study provides evidence of the role of government policy and practice in perpetuating the status quo by not promoting either research on agroecology or direct consumer to producer value chains while providing subsidies for the inputs of industrial agriculture. Originality/value – There have been very few studies that have provided an account of the limited value generated in agricultural commodity chains for smallholder farmers due to the need to purchase the inputs of industrial agriculture supported by government subsidies. This study extends the field of accounting for biodiversity into agriculture using the science of agroecology to explain the role played by biodiversity in increasing the amount of value generated by smallholder farmers. By utilising the labour theory of value, the authors have introduced the notion of the labour power of nature as represented by the environmental services that nature provides.

[1]  C. Dey,et al.  Accounts of nature and the nature of accounts: Critical reflections on environmental accounting and propositions for ecologically informed accounting , 2017 .

[2]  E. Genersch,et al.  Country-specific effects of neonicotinoid pesticides on honey bees and wild bees , 2017, Science.

[3]  U. Grote,et al.  Fairtrade Certification and Livelihood Impacts on Small-scale Coffee Producers in a Tribal Community of India , 2017 .

[4]  E. Vinnari,et al.  The moral mechanism of counter accounts : The case of industrial animal production , 2017 .

[5]  Randa Jabbour.  Coffee Agroecology: A New Approach to Understanding Agricultural Biodiversity, Ecosystem Services and Sustainable Development , 2016 .

[6]  G. Rimmel.  Developing a Reporting and Evaluation Framework for Biodiversity , 2016 .

[7]  Cheryl R. Lehman,et al.  Immigration and neoliberalism: three cases and counter accounts , 2016 .

[8]  Matthew D. Johnson,et al.  Quantifying pest control services by birds and ants in Kenyan coffee farms , 2016 .

[9]  J. Reganold,et al.  Financial competitiveness of organic agriculture on a global scale , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  G. Sizemore.  Accounting for biodiversity in the dairy industry. , 2015, Journal of environmental management.

[11]  L. Jack.  Future making in farm management accounting: The Australian “Blue Book” , 2015 .

[12]  N. Babin.  The Coffee Crisis, Fair Trade, and Agroecological Transformation: Impacts on Land-Use Change in Costa Rica , 2015 .

[13]  O. Boiral.  Accounting for the Unaccountable: Biodiversity Reporting and Impression Management , 2014, Journal of Business Ethics.

[14]  F. V. Tongeren,et al.  Fertiliser and Biofuel Policies in the Global Agricultural Supply Chain: Implications for Agricultural Markets and Farm Incomes , 2014 .

[15]  P. Mineau,et al.  Conclusions of the Worldwide Integrated Assessment on the risks of neonicotinoids and fipronil to biodiversity and ecosystem functioning , 2014, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[16]  Jeffrey Unerman,et al.  Realizing the potential of interdisciplinarity in accounting research , 2014 .

[17]  L. Parker,et al.  Addressing directions in interdisciplinary accounting research , 2014 .

[18]  Jeffrey Unerman,et al.  Academic contributions to enhancing accounting for sustainable development , 2014 .

[19]  Carlos Larrinaga,et al.  Accounting and sustainable development: An exploration , 2014 .

[20]  Jacob Busch,et al.  Biodiversity reporting in Denmark , 2013 .

[21]  G. Rimmel,et al.  Biodiversity reporting in Sweden: corporate disclosure and preparers' views , 2013 .

[22]  Helen Tregidga.  Biodiversity offsetting: problematisation of an emerging governance regime , 2013 .

[23]  Javed Siddiqui.  Mainstreaming biodiversity accounting: Potential implications for a developing economy , 2013 .

[24]  Mark C. Freeman,et al.  Biodiversity valuation and the discount rate problem , 2013 .

[25]  R. Bommarco,et al.  Ecological intensification: harnessing ecosystem services for food security. , 2013, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[26]  Nceus Nceus.  Report on Conditions of Work and Promotion of Livelihoods in the Unorganised Sector , 2012 .

[27]  G. Woodgate,et al.  Agroecology: Foundations in Agrarian Social Thought and Sociological Theory , 2012 .

[28]  Philip McMichael,et al.  The land grab and corporate food regime restructuring , 2012 .

[29]  V. Seufert,et al.  Comparing the yields of organic and conventional agriculture , 2012, Nature.

[30]  R. Gray,et al.  It was 20 years ago today: Sgt Pepper,Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, green accounting and the Blue Meanies , 2012 .

[31]  M. Milne,et al.  Climate change accounting research: keeping it interesting and different , 2011 .

[32]  J. Subervie.  Producer price adjustment to commodity price shocks: An application of threshold cointegration , 2011 .

[33]  M. Altieri,et al.  The agroecological revolution in Latin America: rescuing nature, ensuring food sovereignty and empowering peasants , 2011 .

[34]  C. Bowman,et al.  Accounting for competitive advantage: The resource-based view of the firm and the labour theory of value , 2010 .

[35]  M. Gaffikin.  Twenty-one years of critical resistance—almost: A reflection , 2009 .

[36]  Joni Valkila.  Fair Trade organic coffee production in Nicaragua — Sustainable development or a poverty trap? , 2009 .

[37]  M. Laine,et al.  Ensuring legitimacy through rhetorical changes?: A longitudinal interpretation of the environmental disclosures of a leading Finnish chemical company , 2009 .

[38]  Sven Modell.  In defence of triangulation: A critical realist approach to mixed methods research in management accounting , 2009 .

[39]  Dennis Thomas,et al.  The preservation of indigenous accounting systems in a subaltern community , 2009 .

[40]  C. Graham.  Accounting and subalternity: enlarging a research space , 2009 .

[41]  D. Wickramasinghe,et al.  Weapons of the weak: subalterns' emancipatory accounting in Ceylon Tea , 2009 .

[42]  Crawford Spence,et al.  Social accounting's emancipatory potential: A Gramscian critique , 2009 .

[43]  J. Dillard.  A political base of a polyphonic debate , 2008 .

[44]  Tony Davila,et al.  Cross-paradigm collaboration and the advancement of management accounting knowledge , 2008 .

[45]  E. Barrios.  Soil biota, ecosystem services and land productivity , 2007 .

[46]  L. Jack.  Accounting, post-productivism and corporate power in UK food and agriculture , 2007 .

[47]  K. P. Kannan,et al.  Workers in the informal sector: Initiatives by India's National Commission for Enterprises in the Unorganized Sector (NCEUS) , 2007 .

[48]  S. Butler,et al.  Farmland Biodiversity and the Footprint of Agriculture , 2007, Science.

[49]  Elizabeth A. Monk,et al.  The emancipatory potential of online reporting: The case of counter accounting , 2006 .

[50]  L. Jack.  Protecting agricultural accounting in the UK , 2006 .

[51]  Jeffrey Leiter,et al.  Grounds for Agreement: The Political Economy of the Coffee Commodity Chain , 2005 .

[52]  K. Ninan,et al.  The economics of biodiversity conservation: a study of a coffee growing region in the Western Ghats of India , 2005 .

[53]  Kathleen Herbohn,et al.  A full cost environmental accounting experiment , 2005 .

[54]  J. Bengtsson,et al.  The effects of organic agriculture on biodiversity and abundance: a meta‐analysis , 2005 .

[55]  L. Jack.  Stocks of knowledge, simplification and unintended consequences: the persistence of post-war accounting practices in UK agriculture , 2005 .

[56]  Daniel Corsten,et al.  Controlling the sustainability of food supply chains , 2005 .

[57]  Carol A. Adams,et al.  The ethical, social and environmental reporting‐performance portrayal gap , 2004 .

[58]  C. Bacon.  Confronting the Coffee Crisis: Can Fair Trade, Organic, and Specialty Coffees Reduce Small-Scale Farmer Vulnerability in Northern Nicaragua? , 2004 .

[59]  M. Jones,et al.  Accounting for biodiversity: operationalising environmental accounting , 2003 .

[60]  Tony Tinker,et al.  Beyond a critique of pure reason: From policy to politics to praxis in environmental and social research , 2003 .

[61]  G. Spivak.  Can the Subaltern Speak , 2003 .

[62]  J. Corbin,et al.  The Unstructured Interactive Interview: Issues of Reciprocity and Risks when Dealing with Sensitive Topics , 2003 .

[63]  J. Dillard,et al.  Reflections on the Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Accounting Project , 2003 .

[64]  Miguel A. Altieri,et al.  Agroecology: the science of natural resource management for poor farmers in marginal environments , 2002 .

[65]  R. Gray.  The social accounting project and Accounting Organizations and Society. Privileging engagement, imaginings, new accountings and pragmatism over critique? , 2002 .

[66]  Laura T. Raynolds,et al.  CAPITALISM, AGRICULTURE AND WORLD ECONOMY , 2002 .

[67]  D. Roubik.  Tropical agriculture: The value of bees to the coffee harvest , 2002, Nature.

[68]  K. DeWalt,et al.  Participant Observation: A Guide for Fieldworkers , 2001 .

[69]  Jan Bebbington,et al.  Sustainable Development: A Review of the International Development, Business and Accounting Literature , 2000 .

[70]  R. Gray,et al.  Environmental accounting, managerialism and sustainability: Is the planet safe in the hands of business and accounting? , 2000 .

[71]  S. Gallhofer,et al.  Introduction: accounting and indigenous peoples , 2000 .

[72]  S. Gallhofer,et al.  Developing environmental accounting: insights from indigenous cultures , 2000 .

[73]  H. Gans.  PARTICIPANT OBSERVATION IN THE ERA OF “ETHNOGRAPHY” , 1999 .

[74]  R. Bryer.  MARX AND ACCOUNTING , 1999 .

[75]  G. Lehman.  Disclosing new worlds: a role for social and environmental accounting and auditing , 1999 .

[76]  Donald Q. Innis.  Intercropping and the Scientific Basis of Traditional Agriculture , 1997 .

[77]  M. Jones.  ACCOUNTING FOR BIODIVERSITY: A PILOT STUDY☆☆☆★ , 1996 .

[78]  Elizabeth Garnsey,et al.  Supermarkets and suppliers in the United Kingdom: System integration, information and control , 1996 .

[79]  Christine Cooper,et al.  ON THE PROLIFERATION OF ACCOUNTING (HIS)TORIES , 1996 .

[80]  M. Milne.  On sustainability; the environment and management accounting , 1996 .

[81]  J. Kitzinger,et al.  Qualitative Research: Introducing focus groups , 1995 .

[82]  R. Bryer,et al.  Why Marx's Labour Theory is Superior to the Marginalist Theory of Value: The Case from Modern Financial Reporting , 1994 .

[83]  R. Gray,et al.  Accountants' Attitudes and Environmentally-sensitive Accounting , 1994 .

[84]  M. Altieri.  Ethnoscience and biodiversity: key elements in the design of sustainable pest management systems for small farmers in developing countries , 1993 .

[85]  Christine Cooper.  The Non and Nom of Accounting for (M)other Nature , 1992 .

[86]  R. Gray.  ACCOUNTING AND ENVIRONMENTALISM: AN EXPLORATION OF THE CHALLENGE OF GENTLY ACCOUNTING FOR... , 1992 .

[87]  R. Burritt,et al.  Accounting and Ecological Crisis , 1991 .

[88]  M. Altieri.  The question of small farm development: Who teaches whom? , 1983 .

[89]  John Smith.  Imperialism in the Twenty-First Century , 2016 .

[90]  Peter Maurer,et al.  The Entropy Law And The Economic Process , 2016 .

[91]  P. Ekins,et al.  Sustainable livelihoods: the poor's reconciliation of environment and development , 2010 .

[92]  R. Raina,et al.  Agricultural growth in India : role of technology, incentives, and institutions , 2010 .

[93]  L. Jack.  The adoption of strategic management accounting tools in agriculture post subsidy reform: a comparative study of practices in the UK, the US, Australia and New Zealand , 2009 .

[94]  M. Altieri.  Small Farms as a Planetary Ecological Asset: Five Key Reasons Why We Should Support the Revitalisation of Small Farms in the Global South , 2008 .

[95]  David A. Padua,et al.  Editors' introduction , 2007, International Journal of Parallel Programming.

[96]  I. Scoones.  Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: A Framework for Analysis , 1998 .

[97]  J. Kitzinger.  The methodology of focus groups: the importance of interaction between research participants , 1994 .

[98]  R. Chambers,et al.  Sustainable rural livelihoods: Practical concepts for the 21st century , 1992 .

[99]  S. H. Davis,et al.  Selecting Ethnographic Informants. , 1992 .

[100]  R. D. Hines,et al.  Financial accounting: In communicating reality, we construct reality , 1988 .

[101]  A. Tinker,et al.  The normative origins of positive theories: Ideology and accounting thought , 1982 .

[102]  D. Struik,et al.  The Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844 , 1932 .

[103]  I. Scoones.  Please Scroll down for Article Journal of Peasant Studies Livelihoods Perspectives and Rural Development Livelihoods Perspectives and Rural Development , 2022 .