Effect of particle orientation and of flow velocity on the combustibility of Pinus pinaster and Eucalyptus globulus firebrand material

Spotting is a very important mechanism of forest fire spread. Its negative effect increases in extreme fire danger conditions. In order to predict the maximum spotting distance, the duration of the combustion reaction of potential firebrands should be evaluated. This paper reports the results of an experimental laboratory study of the combustibility of firebrand material (pine cones and scales and pieces of bark of eucalypt) of two representative species in Portugal, Pinus pinaster Ait. and Eucalyptus globulus Labill. The main purpose was to assess the role on the burning conditions of the firebrand particle orientation angle θ in relation to the airflow and of the flow velocity (U) around the particle. Tests were made varying the angle of orientation of the main axis of the particle in relation to incident flow in the range of ±90°; flow velocities were tested from 0 to 6.5 m s–1. After ignition, particle mass loss owing to flaming or glowing combustion of the particle was continuously measured. Residual mass, duration of the flaming phase and the burnout times are reported for each case. Empirical models to estimate the trends of variation of some of these parameters with θ and U are proposed to illustrate their importance for the range of test conditions.

[1]  Carlos Sánchez Tarifa,et al.  Transport and Combustion of Firebrands. Final Report of Grants FG-SP-114 and FG-SP-146 Vol. II , 1967 .

[2]  H. B. Clements Lift-off of forest firebrands , 1977 .

[3]  F. Usda,et al.  Transport of Firebrands by Line Thermals , 1983 .

[4]  R. O. Weber,et al.  Flame Spread Measurements on Single Ponderosa Pine Needles: Effect of Sample Orientation and Concurrent External Flow , 1990 .

[5]  R. Rothermel,et al.  Mann Gulch fire: A race that couldn't be won , 1993 .

[6]  Patricia L. Andrews,et al.  Fire behavior associated with the 1994 South Canyon fire on Storm King Mountain, Colorado , 1998 .

[7]  R. Fonda,et al.  Burning characteristics of cones from eight pine species , 2004 .

[8]  R. A. Anthenien,et al.  On the trajectories of embers initially elevated or lofted by small scale ground fire plumes in high winds , 2006 .

[9]  Samuel L. Manzello,et al.  Ignition of mulch and grasses by firebrands in wildland–urban interface fires , 2006 .

[10]  D. Weise,et al.  EFFECTS OF MOISTURE ON IGNITION BEHAVIOR OF MOIST CALIFORNIA CHAPARRAL AND UTAH LEAVES , 2007 .

[11]  Samuel L. Manzello,et al.  Firebrand generation from burning vegetation , 2007 .

[12]  A. Carlos Fernandez-Pello,et al.  Modeling transport and combustion of firebrands from burning trees , 2007 .

[13]  Flame interactions and burning characteristics of two live leaf samples , 2009 .

[14]  D. Weise,et al.  Experimental measurements during combustion of moist individual foliage samples , 2010 .

[15]  David R. Weise,et al.  Firebrands and spotting ignition in large-scale fires , 2010 .