Accurately Predicting Functional Connectivity from Diffusion Imaging

Understanding the relationship between the dynamics of neural processes and the anatomical substrate of the brain is a central question in neuroscience. On the one hand, modern neuroimaging technologies, such as diffusion tensor imaging, can be used to construct structural graphs representing the architecture of white matter streamlines linking cortical and subcortical structures. On the other hand, temporal patterns of neural activity can be used to construct functional graphs representing temporal correlations between brain regions. Although some studies provide evidence that whole-brain functional connectivity is shaped by the underlying anatomy, the observed relationship between function and structure is weak, and the rules by which anatomy constrains brain dynamics remain elusive. In this article, we introduce a methodology to predict with high accuracy the functional connectivity of a subject at rest from his or her structural graph. Using our methodology, we are able to systematically unveil the role of structural paths in the formation of functional correlations. Furthermore, in our empirical evaluations, we observe that the eigen-modes of the predicted functional connectivity are aligned with activity patterns associated with different cognitive systems. Our work offers the potential to infer properties of brain dynamics in clinical or developmental populations with low tolerance for functional neuroimaging.

[1]  P. Bonacich.  Power and Centrality: A Family of Measures , 1987, American Journal of Sociology.

[2]  Maurizio Corbetta,et al.  Resting-State Functional Connectivity Emerges from Structurally and Dynamically Shaped Slow Linear Fluctuations , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  Richard F. Betzel,et al.  Resting-brain functional connectivity predicted by analytic measures of network communication , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Fredrik Meyer,et al.  Representation theory , 2015 .

[5]  O Sporns,et al.  Predicting human resting-state functional connectivity from structural connectivity , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  G. Deco,et al.  Emerging concepts for the dynamical organization of resting-state activity in the brain , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[7]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Convex Optimization , 2004, Algorithms and Theory of Computation Handbook.

[8]  Michael R. Chernick,et al.  Wavelet Methods for Time Series Analysis , 2001, Technometrics.

[9]  N. Logothetis.  What we can do and what we cannot do with fMRI , 2008, Nature.

[10]  O. Sporns,et al.  Mapping the Structural Core of Human Cerebral Cortex , 2008, PLoS biology.

[11]  Mark Newman,et al.  Networks: An Introduction , 2010 .

[12]  Yong He,et al.  BrainNet Viewer: A Network Visualization Tool for Human Brain Connectomics , 2013, PloS one.

[13]  Susumu Mori,et al.  Fiber tracking: principles and strategies – a technical review , 2002, NMR in biomedicine.

[14]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Structural foundations of resting-state and task-based functional connectivity in the human brain , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  The Human Connectome: A Structural Description of the Human Brain , 2005, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[16]  R. Kahn,et al.  Functionally linked resting‐state networks reflect the underlying structural connectivity architecture of the human brain , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[17]  N. Tzourio-Mazoyer,et al.  Automated Anatomical Labeling of Activations in SPM Using a Macroscopic Anatomical Parcellation of the MNI MRI Single-Subject Brain , 2002, NeuroImage.

[18]  L. Shah,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 2010, Seminars in roentgenology.

[19]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Mapping anatomical connectivity patterns of human cerebral cortex using in vivo diffusion tensor imaging tractography. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[20]  O. Sporns,et al.  Functional connectivity between anatomically unconnected areas is shaped by collective network-level effects in the macaque cortex. , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[21]  Stefan Rotter,et al.  How Structure Determines Correlations in Neuronal Networks , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[22]  O. Sporns.  Contributions and challenges for network models in cognitive neuroscience , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[23]  A. Walden,et al.  Wavelet Methods for Time Series Analysis , 2000 .

[24]  M. Greicius,et al.  Resting-state functional connectivity reflects structural connectivity in the default mode network. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[25]  Gordon F. Royle,et al.  Algebraic Graph Theory , 2001, Graduate texts in mathematics.

[26]  R. F. Galán,et al.  On How Network Architecture Determines the Dominant Patterns of Spontaneous Neural Activity , 2008, PLoS ONE.

[27]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  fMRI resting state networks define distinct modes of long-distance interactions in the human brain , 2006, NeuroImage.

[28]  Danielle S. Bassett,et al.  Conserved and variable architecture of human white matter connectivity , 2011, NeuroImage.