We present a web-based environment - an Ethics Workbench - which
allows a reader's ethical judgments to be solicited while reading a
narrative. Preliminary results show generally consistent scores across
subjects and test conditions, and suggest that it is possible to
measure how individual readers respond to texts in terms of ethical
judgments, how the linearity inherent in narrative plays a role in
affecting ethical judgments, and how readers appear to synthesize
judgments over the course of a text. Applications of the model include
the empirical analysis of the ethical aspects of reading, the more
detailed study of ethical issues, the potential for eliciting ethical
discussions, and a means of dynamically planning texts to achieve
maximum effect with respect to reader judgments.
[1]
A. Sorace,et al.
MAGNITUDE ESTIMATION OF LINGUISTIC ACCEPTABILITY
,
1996
.
[2]
A. Jhala,et al.
A Crowd-Sourced Collection of Narratives for Studying Conflict
,
2012
.
[3]
C. Gilligan.
In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development
,
2009
.
[4]
James M. Phelan.
Narrative Judgments and the Rhetorical Theory of Narrative: Ian McEwan's Atonement
,
2007
.
[5]
B. Hurwitz.
Textual Practices in Crafting Bioethics Cases
,
2012,
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry.
[6]
Brian Boyd,et al.
On the Origin of Stories: Evolution, Cognition, and Fiction
,
2009
.