The role of the size of infarcted area on two kinds of vulnerable window in two dimension ventricular tissue

Aims: Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is mainly induced by ventricular arrhythmia, especially among patients with myocardial infarction (MI). Previous studies have shown that ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation are thought to be caused by re-entrant waves of excitation. Although in heterogeneous tissue, the traditional vulnerable window of unidirectional block and the vulnerable window when bidirectional propagation was initiated could coexist, little studies are based on effects of infarcted areas on both vulnerable windows.Methods and Results: The electrophysiology remodeling was based on TP06 model in the present study. In simulation of two-dimension (2D) ideal models, excitation wave conduction in ventricular tissue was simulated under three different types of stimulus. 2D ideal models of ventricular tissue were constructed as loop areas in the center of a square tissue with the resolution of 600×600 grid points and cell size of 0.35mm. Simulation results showed that the traditional vulnerable window when unidirectional propagation was initiated was consistent no matter where the position of stimulus is and how long and how wide the size of the infarcted area is. However, the vulnerable window when bidirectional propagation was initiated varies in different conditions.Conclusion: The traditional vulnerable window could not reflect the role of the infarcted area on arrhythmogenesis. The vulnerable window when bidirectional propagation was initiated increases with the increasement of the width and the length of the infarcted area with the appropriate position of the stimulus, which could help us to conclude the arrhythmogenesis according to the size of infarcted areas.

[1]  M. Rayner,et al.  Cardiovascular disease in Europe: epidemiological update 2016. , 2016, European heart journal.

[2]  Gernot Plank,et al.  Tachycardia in Post-Infarction Hearts: Insights from 3D Image-Based Ventricular Models , 2013, PloS one.

[3]  A V Panfilov,et al.  A guide to modelling cardiac electrical activity in anatomically detailed ventricles. , 2008, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[4]  Sébastien Roujol,et al.  A swine model of infarct-related reentrant ventricular tachycardia: Electroanatomic, magnetic resonance, and histopathological characterization. , 2016, Heart rhythm.

[5]  B. Gersh,et al.  The pathophysiology of acute myocardial infarction and strategies of protection beyond reperfusion: a continual challenge. , 2016, European heart journal.

[6]  Peter Kohl,et al.  Novel therapeutic strategies targeting fibroblasts and fibrosis in heart disease , 2016, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[7]  Natalia A Trayanova,et al.  A feasibility study of arrhythmia risk prediction in patients with myocardial infarction and preserved ejection fraction. , 2016, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[8]  Y Rudy,et al.  The Vulnerable Window for Unidirectional Block in Cardiac Tissue: , 1995, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[9]  Peter Scarborough,et al.  Cardiovascular disease in Europe: epidemiological update. , 2014, European heart journal.

[10]  K.H.W.J. ten Tusscher,et al.  Comments on 'A model for human ventricular tissue' : reply , 2005 .

[11]  Vijay Devabhaktuni,et al.  Effects of Fibrosis Morphology on Reentrant Ventricular Tachycardia Inducibility and Simulation Fidelity in Patient-Derived Models , 2014, Clinical Medicine Insights. Cardiology.

[12]  K. T. ten Tusscher,et al.  Alternans and spiral breakup in a human ventricular tissue model. , 2006, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[13]  Anushka Michailova,et al.  Modeling transmural heterogeneity of K(ATP) current in rabbit ventricular myocytes. , 2007, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.